Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
In This Section

Folia Linguistica

Acta Societatis Linguisticae Europaeae

Editor-in-Chief: Cuyckens, Hubert / Norde, Muriel

4 Issues per year


Folia Linguistica
IMPACT FACTOR 2016: 0.312
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 0.578

CiteScore 2016: 0.34

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2015: 0.285
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2015: 1.089


Folia Linguistica Historica
IMPACT FACTOR 2016: 0.294
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 0.263

Online
ISSN
1614-7308
See all formats and pricing
In This Section
Volume 49, Issue 1 (May 2015)

Issues

The long and short of verb alternations in Mauritian Creole and Bantu languages

Jenneke van der Wal
  • Corresponding author
  • Faculty of Modern & Medieval Languages, University of Cambridge, Sidgwick Avenue, Cambridge CB3 9DA, UK
  • Email:
/ Tonjes Veenstra
  • Zentrum für Allgemeine Sprachwissenschaft, Schützenstrasse 18, 10117 Berlin, Germany
  • Email:
Published Online: 2015-04-28 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/flin-2015-0003

Abstract

Mauritian Creole displays an alternation between a short and a long form of the verb, which is reminiscent of the conjoint–disjoint alternation found in some eastern Bantu languages. Based on comparison with other French-based creoles and socio-historical evidence, we conclude that the Bantu substrate must have had an impact on the grammatical system of Mauritian Creole. We compare the synchronic properties of the alternations in Mauritian Creole and the most likely substrate Bantu languages of northern Mozambique and examine two possible scenarios for the influence of Bantu on the Mauritian verbal alternation, concluding that probably only the (syntactic) basics of the Bantu alternation motivated the persistence of the alternation in Mauritian Creole.

Keywords: Bantu; creole; conjoint/disjoint alternation; language contact; focus

References

  • Allen, Richard B. 2008. The constant demand of the French: The Mascarene slave trade and the worlds of the Indian Ocean and Atlantic during the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries. Journal of African History 49. 43–72.

  • Alpers, Edward A. 1975. Ivory and slaves in East Africa. London: Heinemann.

  • Arends, Jacques 2008. A demographic perspective on creole formation. In Silvia Kouwenberg & John V. Singler (eds.), The handbook of Pidgin and Creole studies, 309–331. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.

  • Baker, Philip. 1972. Kreol: A description of Mauritian Creole. London: C. Hurst & Company.

  • Baker, Philip. 2008. Elements for a sociolinguistic history of Mauritius and its Creole (to 1968). In Philip Baker & Guillaume Fon Sing (eds.), The making of Mauritian Creole, 307–334. London: Battlebridge Press.

  • Baker, Philip & Chris Corne. 1982. Isle de France Creole: Affinities and origins. Ann Arbor, MI: Karoma.

  • Batibo, Herman M., James Moilwa & Naledi M. Mosaka. 1997. The historical implications of the linguistics relationship between Makua and Sotho languages. PULA Journal of African Studies 11(1). 23–29.

  • Becker, Angelika & Tonjes Veenstra. 2003. The survival of inflectional morphology in French-related creoles: The role of SLA processes. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 25(2). 283–306.

  • Brinton, Laurel & Dieter Stein. 1995. Functional renewal. In Henning Andersen (ed.), Historical linguistics 1993: Selected papers from the 11th International Conference on Historical Linguistics, 33–47. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

  • Buell, Leston. 2005. Issues in Zulu verbal morphosyntax. Los Angeles, CA: UCLA PhD dissertation.

  • Buell, Leston. 2006. The Zulu conjoint/disjoint verb alternation: Focus or constituency? ZAS Working Papers in Linguistics 43. 9–30.

  • Buell, Leston. 2009. Evaluating the immediate postverbal position as a focus position in Zulu. In Masangu Matondo, Fiona McLaughlin & Eric Potsdam (eds.), Selected proceedings of the 38th Annual Conference on African Linguistics: Linguistic theory and African language documentation, 166–172. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.

  • Cheng, Lisa L.-S. & Laura J. Downing. 2009. Where’s the topic in Zulu? The Linguistic Review 26. 207–238.

  • Cheng, Lisa L.-S. & Laura J. Downing. 2012. Against FocusP: Arguments from Zulu. In Ivona Kucerova & Ad Neeleman (eds.), Information structure: Contrasts and positions, 247–267. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Corne, Chris 1982. Final vowel truncation in Indian Ocean Creole French. In Philip Baker & Chris Corne (eds.), Isle de France creole: Affinities and origins, 49–63. Ann Arbor, MI: Karoma.

  • Corne, Chris. 1999. From French to Creole. London: University of Westminster Press.

  • Costa, João & Nancy C. Kula. 2008. Focus at the interface: Evidence from Romance and Bantu. In Cecile De Cat & Katherine Demuth (eds.), The BantuRomance connection, 293–322. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

  • Creissels, Denis. 1996. Conjunctive and disjunctive verb forms in Setswana. South African Journal of African Languages 16. 109–115.

  • Demuth, Katherine & Mark Johnson. 1989. Interactions between discourse functions and agreement in Setswana. Journal of African Languages and Linguistics 11. 22–35.

  • Devos, Maud. 2008. A grammar of Makwe (Studies in African linguistics 71). Munich: LINCOM Europa.

  • Güldemann, Tom. 2003. Present progressive vis-à-vis predication focus in Bantu: A verbal category between semantics and pragmatics. Studies in Language 27. 323–360. [Crossref]

  • Guthrie, Malcolm. 1967 [1948]. The classification of the Bantu languages. London: Oxford University Press.

  • Halpert, Claire. 2012. Argument licensing and agreement in Zulu. Cambridge, MA: MIT PhD dissertation.

  • Harris, Martin. 1989. French. In Bernard Comrie (ed.), The world’s major languages, 210–235. London: Routledge.

  • Haudrère, Philippe. 1989. La compagnie francaise des Indes au XVIIIe siècle (1719–1795). Paris: Librairie de l’Inde.

  • Henri, Fabiola. 2010. A constraint-based approach to verbal constructions in Mauritian: Morphological, syntactic and discourse-based aspects. Paris: PhD Dissertation (University of Mauritius & Ecole Doctorale des Sciences du Langage, ED 132, Université Paris Diderot, Paris 7).

  • Henri, Fabiola & Anne Abeillé. 2008. Verb forms alternation in Mauritian. On-line Proceedings of the HPSG-2008 Conference, Keihanna, Kyoto. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.

  • Janson, Tore. 1991–1992. Southern Bantu and Makua. Sprache und Geschichte in Afrika 12–13. 63–106.

  • Klein, Wolfgang & Clive Perdue. 1997. The basic variety. Second Language Research 13. 301–347. [Crossref]

  • Kraal, Peter. 2005. A grammar of Makonde. Leiden: University of Leiden PhD dissertation.

  • Larson, Pier M. 2007. Enslaved Malagasy and ‘Le Travail De La Parole’ in the pre-revolutionary Mascarenes. Journal of African History 48. 457–79.

  • Maho, Juni. 2009. NUGL online: The online version of the New Updated Guthrie List, a referential classification of the Bantu languages (http://goto.glocalnet.net/mahopapers/nuglonline.pdf).

  • Meeussen, A. E. 1959. Essai de Grammaire Rundi (Annales du Musée Royal du Congo Belge, Série Sciences Humaines 24). Tervuren: Musée Royal du Congo Belge.

  • Mesthrie, Rajend. 2006. Subordinate immigrant languages and language endangerment : Two community studies from KwaZulu-Natal. Language Matters: Studies in the Languages of Africa 37(1). 3–15. [Crossref]

  • Nurse, Derek. 2008. Tense and aspect in Bantu. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Nurse, Derek & Gerard Philippson. 2003. The Bantu languages. London: Routledge.

  • Odden, David. 1996. The phonology and morphology of Kimatuumbi. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

  • Odden, David. 2003. Rifiji-Ruvuma (N10, P10–20). In Derek Nurse & Gérard Philipson (eds.), The Bantu languages, 529–545. London: Routledge.

  • Rottet, Kevin. 1992. Functional categories and verb raising in Louisiana Creole. Probus 4. 261–289.

  • Seedat, Zubeda Kassim. 1983. The Zanzibaris in Durban. Durban: University of Natal MA thesis.

  • Seuren, Pieter 1990. Verb syncopation and predicate raising in Mauritian Creole. Linguistics 28(4). 809–844.

  • Seuren, Pieter 1995. Notes on the history and the syntax of Mauritian Creole. Linguistics 33. 531–577.

  • Smith, Norval S.H. 2006. Very rapid creolization in the framework of the Restricted Motivation Hypothesis. In Claire Lefebvre, Lydia White & Christine Jourdan (eds.), L2 acquisition and creole genesis: Dialogues (Language Acquisition and Language Disorders 42), 49–65. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

  • Syea, Anand 1992. The short and long form of verbs in Mauritian Creole: Functionalism versus formalism. Theoretical Linguistics 1(18). 61–97.

  • Trudgill, Peter. 2011 Sociolinguistic typology: Social determinants of linguistic complexity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Vallduvi, Enric & Maria Vilkuna. 1998. On rheme and kontrast. In Peter Culicover & Louise McNally (eds.), The limits of syntax, 79–108. New York: Academic Press.

  • Van der Spuy, Andrew. 1993. Dislocated noun phrases in Nguni. Lingua 90. 335–355. [Crossref]

  • Van der Wal, Jenneke. 2008. Agreement in thetic sentences in Bantu and Romance. In Cecile De Cat & Katherine Demuth (eds.), The BantuRomance connection, 323–350. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

  • Van der Wal, Jenneke. 2009. Word order and information structure in Makhuwa-Enahara. Utrecht: LOT.

  • Van der Wal, Jenneke. 2011. Focus excluding alternatives: Conjoint/disjoint marking in Makhuwa. Lingua 121(11). 1734–1750. [Crossref]

  • Van der Wal, Jenneke. 2014. Subordinate clauses and exclusive focus in Makhuwa. In Rik van Gijn, Jeremy Hammond, Dejan Matić, Saskia van Putten & Ana Vilacy Galucio (eds.), Information structure and reference tracking in complex sentences, 45–70. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

  • Van der Wal, Jenneke & Larry M. Hyman (eds.). In preparation. The conjoint/disjoint alternation in Bantu (Trends in Linguistics). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.

  • Veenstra, Tonjes. 2003. What verbal morphology can tell us about creole genesis: The case of French-related creoles. In Ingo Plag (ed.), Phonology and morphology of creole languages, 293–314. Tübingen: Niemeyer.

  • Veenstra, Tonjes. 2007. Verb allomorphy in French-related creoles and the syntax-phonology interface. In Emily Elfner & Martin Walkow (eds.), Proceedings of Thirty-Seventh Annual Meeting of the North East Linguistic Society (NELS 37), 17–30. Amherst, MA: GSLA Publications.

  • Veenstra, Tonjes. 2008. Creole genesis: The impact of the language bioprogram hypothesis. In Silvia Kouwenberg & John V. Singler (eds.), The handbook of Pidgin and Creole studies, 219–241. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.

  • Veenstra, Tonjes. 2009. Verb allomorphy and the syntax of phases. In Enoch Aboh & Norval Smith (eds.), Complex processes in new languages, 99–113. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

  • Watters, John. 1979. Focus in Aghem: A study of its formal correlates and typology. In Larry M. Hyman (ed.), Aghem grammatical structure (SCOPIL 7), 137–197. Los Angeles, CA: USC Department of Linguistics Publications.

  • Zerbian, Sabine. 2006. Expression of information structure in Northern Sotho. Berlin: Humboldt University PhD Dissertation.

  • Zerbian, Sabine. 2007. A first approach to information structuring in Xitsonga/Xichangana. In Lutz Marten & Nancy Kula (eds.), SOAS Working Papers in Linguistics 15 (Bantu in Bloomsbury: Special issue on Bantu Linguistics), 65–78. London: SOAS, University of London, Department of Linguistics.

  • Zribi-Hertz, Anne & L. J. Li Pook Tan 1987. Gouvernement et syntagme verbal: A propos de la truncation verbale en Creole Mauricien. Documents de travailUniversité Paris 8(1). 57–86.

About the article

Revised: 2013-08-08

Revised: 2014-05-23

Received: 2014-07-25

Accepted: 2014-08-18

Published Online: 2015-04-28

Published in Print: 2015-05-01



Citation Information: Folia Linguistica, ISSN (Online) 1614-7308, ISSN (Print) 0165-4004, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/flin-2015-0003. Export Citation

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in