Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Folia Linguistica

Acta Societatis Linguisticae Europaeae

Editor-in-Chief: Fischer, Olga / Norde, Muriel

4 Issues per year

Folia Linguistica
IMPACT FACTOR 2017: 0.324
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 0.616

CiteScore 2017: 0.55

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2017: 0.349
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2017: 1.093

Folia Linguistica Historica
IMPACT FACTOR 2017: 0.529
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 0.525

See all formats and pricing
More options …
Volume 49, Issue 1


Prosodic phrasing of relative clauses with two possible antecedents in Spanish: A comparison of Spanish native speakers and L1 Basque bilingual speakers

Irene de la Cruz-Pavía
  • Corresponding author
  • Department of Linguistics and Basque Studies, University of the Basque Country UPV/EHU, Paseo de la Universidad 5, 01006, Vitoria-Gasteiz, Spain
  • Email
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
/ Gorka Elordieta
  • Department of Linguistics and Basque Studies, University of the Basque Country UPV/EHU, Paseo de la Universidad 5, 01006, Vitoria-Gasteiz, Spain
  • Email
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
Published Online: 2015-04-28 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/flin-2015-0006


The present production study investigates the prosodic phrasing characteristic of sentences containing a relative clause with two possible noun phrase antecedents [Noun Phrase 1 Noun Phrase 2 Relative Clause] in the variety of Spanish spoken in the Basque Country. It aims to establish the default prosodic phrasing of these structures, as well as whether differences are found in phrasing between native and non-native speakers. Additionally, it examines the effect on prosodic phrasing of constituent length and familiarity with the sentences (skimming the sentences prior to reading them aloud). To do that, the productions of 8 Spanish monolinguals, 8 first language (L1) Spanish/second language (L2) Basque bilinguals, and 8 L1Basque/L2Spanish bilinguals are examined. A default phrasing consisting of the prevalence of a prosodic break after NP2 ([NP1 NP2/RC]) is obtained, and differences are found between the prosodic contours of native and non-native speakers. Additionally, a constituent length effect is found, with a higher frequency of prosodic boundaries after NP2 as RC length increases, as predicted by Fodor’s Same Size Sister Constraint. Last, familiarity with the sentences was found to increase the frequency of occurrence of the default phrasing.

Keywords: relative clauses; prosodic phrasing; constituent length; skimming; bilinguals


  • Acuña-Fariña, Carlos, Isabel Fraga, Javier García-Orza & Ana Piñeiro. 2009. Animacy in the adjunction of Spanish RCs to complex NPs. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology 21(8). 1137–1365.CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Boersma, Paul & David Weenink. 2008. Praat: Doing phonetics by computer. http://www.fon.hum.uva.nl/praat/ (accessed 6 February 2015).

  • Brysbaert, Marc & Don C. Mitchell. 1996. Modifier attachment in sentence processing: Evidence in Dutch. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 49A. 664–695.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Carreiras, Manuel & Charles Clifton Jr. 1993. Relative clause interpretation preferences in Spanish and English. Language and Speech 36. 353–372.PubMedGoogle Scholar

  • Carreiras, Manuel & Charles Clifton Jr. 1999. Another word on parsing relative clauses: Eyetracking evidence from Spanish and English. Memory & Cognition 27. 826–833.CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar

  • Carreiras, Manuel, Elena Salillas & Horacio Barber. 2004. Event related potentials elicited during parsing of ambiguous relative clauses in Spanish. Cognitive Brain Research 20. 98–105.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Cuetos, Fernando & Don C. Mitchell. 1988. Cross-linguistic differences in parsing relative clauses: Restrictions on the use of the late closure strategy in Spanish. Cognition 30. 73–105.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • De Vincenzi, Marica & Remo Job. 1993. Some observations on the universality of the late-closure strategy. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 22. 189–206.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Desmet, Timothy, Marc Brysbaert & Constantijn De Baecke. 2002. The correspondence between sentence production and corpus frequencies in modifier attachment. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 55A(3). 879–896.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Desmet, Timothy, Constantijn De Baecke, Denis Drieghe, Marc Brysbaert & Wietske Vonk. 2006. Relative clause attachment in Dutch: On-line comprehension corresponds to corpus frequencies when lexical variables are taken into account. Language and Cognitive Processes 21. 453–485.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • D’Imperio, Mariapaola, Gorka Elordieta, Sónia Frota, Pilar Prieto & Marina Vigário. 2005. Intonational phrasing in romance: The role of syntactic and prosodic structure. In Sonia Frota, Marina Vigário & M. João Freitas (eds.), Prosodies, 59–97. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

  • Ehrlich, Karen, Eva M. Fernández, Janet D. Fodor, Eric Stenshoel & Mihai Vinereanu. 1999. Low attachment of relative clauses: New data from Swedish, Norwegian and Romanian. Poster presented at the 12th Annual CUNY Conference on Human Sentence Processing, New York, USA, 18–20 March.Google Scholar

  • Elordieta, Gorka, Sónia Frota & Marina Vigário. 2005. Subjects, objects and intonational phrasing in Spanish and Portuguese. Studia Linguistica 59(2/3). 110–143.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Fodor, Janet D. 1998. Learning to parse? Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 27. 285–319.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Fodor, Janet D. 2002. Prosodic disambiguation in silent reading . In Masako Hirotani (ed.), Proceedings of the 32nd North-Eastern Linguistic Society, 113–132. Amherst: Graduate Linguistics Student Association (GLSA).Google Scholar

  • Fraga, Isabel, Javier García-Orza & Juan Carlos Acuña. 2005. La desambiguación de oraciones de relativo en gallego: Nueva evidencia de adjunción alta en lenguas romances. Psicológica 26. 243–260.Google Scholar

  • Gutierrez, Eider, Manuel Carreiras & Itziar Laka. 2004. Who was on the balcony? Bilingual sentence processing: Relative clause attachment in Basque and Spanish. Poster presented at 17th Annual CUNY Conference on Human Sentence Processing, University of Maryland, USA, 25–27 March.Google Scholar

  • Hemforth, Barbara, Lars Konieczny, Christoph Scheepers & Gerhard Strube. 1998. Syntactic ambiguity resolution in German. In Dieter Hillert (ed.), Sentence processing: A crosslinguistic perspective, 293–312. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar

  • Jun, Sun-Ah. 2003. Prosodic phrasing and attachment preferences. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 32(2). 219–249.CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar

  • Jun, Sun-Ah & Sahyang Kim. 2004. Default phrasing and attachment preference in Korean. In INTERSPEECH-2004, 3009–3012 (http://www.isca-speech.org/archive/archive_papers/interspeech_2004/i04_3009.pdf).Google Scholar

  • Jun, Sun-Ah & Chisato Koike. 2008. Default prosody and relative clause attachment in Japanese. In Mutsuko Endo Hudson, Peter Sells & Sun-Ah Jun (eds.), Japanese/Korean linguistics 13, 41–53. Stanford: CSLI.Google Scholar

  • Lovrić, Nenad, Dianne Bradley & Janet D. Fodor. 2000. RC attachment in Croatian with and without preposition. Poster presented at Architectures and Mechanisms for Language Processing Conference (AMLaP), Leiden, 21–23 September.Google Scholar

  • Lovrić, Nenad, Dianne Bradley & Janet D. Fodor. 2001. Silent prosody resolves syntactic ambiguities: Evidence from Croatian. Paper presented at the SNY/CUNY/NYU Linguistics Miniconference, New York, 10 March.Google Scholar

  • Maynell, Laurie A. 1999. Effect of pitch accent placement on resolving relative clause ambiguity in English. Poster presented at the 12th Annual CUNY Conference on Human Sentence Processing, New York, 18–20 March.Google Scholar

  • Mitchell, Don C., Marc Brysbaert, Stefan Grondelaers & Piet Swanepoel. 2000. Modifier attachment in Dutch: Testing aspects of construal theory. In Alan Kennedy, Ralph Radach, Dieter Heller & Joël Pynte (eds.), Reading as a perceptual process, 493–516. Oxford: Elsevier.Google Scholar

  • Miyamoto, Edson T. 1998. A low attachment preference in Brazilian Portuguese relative clauses. Paper presented at Architectures and Mechanisms for Language Processing Conference (AMLaP), Freiburg, Germany, 24–26 September.Google Scholar

  • Soares, Ana Paula, Isabel Fraga, Montserrat Comesaña & Ana Piñeiro. 2010. El papel de la animacidad en la resolución de ambigüedades sintácticas en portugués europeo: Evidencia en tareas de producción y comprensión [the role of animacy in European Portuguese relative clause attachment: evidence from production and comprehension tasks]. Psicothema 22(4). 691–696.Google Scholar

  • Zagar, Daniel, Joel Pynte & Sylvie Rativeau. 1997. Evidence for early closure attachment on first pass reading times in French. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 50A(2). 421–438.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

About the article

Revised: 2013-06-15

Revised: 2014-04-28

Received: 2014-06-17

Accepted: 2014-11-02

Published Online: 2015-04-28

Published in Print: 2015-05-01

Citation Information: Folia Linguistica, Volume 49, Issue 1, Pages 185–204, ISSN (Online) 1614-7308, ISSN (Print) 0165-4004, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/flin-2015-0006.

Export Citation

©2015 by De Gruyter Mouton.Get Permission

Citing Articles

Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.

Lauren A. Fromont, Salvador Soto-Faraco, and Emmanuel Biau
Frontiers in Psychology, 2017, Volume 8

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in