Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Folia Linguistica

Acta Societatis Linguisticae Europaeae

Editor-in-Chief: Cuyckens, Hubert / Norde, Muriel

4 Issues per year


Folia Linguistica
IMPACT FACTOR 2016: 0.312
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 0.578

CiteScore 2016: 0.34

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2016: 0.398
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2016: 0.538


Folia Linguistica Historica
IMPACT FACTOR 2016: 0.294
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 0.263

Online
ISSN
1614-7308
See all formats and pricing
More options …
Volume 50, Issue 2 (Nov 2016)

Issues

Why we need a token-based typology: A case study of analytic and lexical causatives in fifteen European languages

Natalia Levshina
Published Online: 2016-11-08 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/flin-2016-0019

Abstract

This paper investigates variation of lexical and analytic causatives in 15 European languages from the Germanic, Romance, and Slavic genera based on a multilingual parallel corpus of film subtitles. Using typological parameters of variation of causatives from the literature, this study tests which parameters are relevant for the choice between analytic and lexical causatives in the sample of languages. The main research question is whether the variation is constrained by one semantic dimension, namely, the conceptual integration of the causing and caused events, as suggested by previous research on iconicity in language, or whether several different semantic and syntactic factors are at play. To answer this question, I use an exploratory multivariate technique for categorical data (Multiple Correspondence Analysis with supplementary points) and conditional random forests, a nonparametric regression and classification method. The study demonstrates the importance of corpus data in testing typological hypotheses.

Keywords: parallel corpus; analytic causative; lexical causative; Multiple Correspondence Analysis; random forests

References

  • Bickel, Balthasar, Jan Strunk, Swintha Danielsen, Iren Hartmann, Brigitte Pakendorf, Søren Wichmann, Alena Witzlack-Makarevich, Taras Zakharko & Frank Seifart. 2015. Noun-to-verb ratio and word order. Presentation at the conference Diversity linguistics: Retrospect and Prospect, MPI EVA, Leipzig, Germany, 1–3 May.

  • Comrie, Bernard. 1981. Language universals and linguistic typology: Syntax and morphology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

  • Croft, William. 1991. Syntactic categories and grammatical relations: The cognitive organization of information. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

  • Cysouw, Michael. 2014. Inducing semantic roles. In Silvia Luraghi & Heiko Narrog (eds.), Perspectives on semantic roles, 23–68. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

  • Cysouw, Michael & Bernhard Wälchli. 2007. Parallel texts: Using translational equivalents in linguistic typology. Sprachtypologie Und Universalienforschung (STUF) 60(2). 95–99.Google Scholar

  • Dixon, R. M. W. 2000. A typology of causatives: Form, syntax and meaning. In R. M. W. Dixon & Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald (eds.), Changing valency: Case studies in transitivity, 30–83. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Dryer, Matthew S. 2013. Order of adjective and noun. In Matthew S. Dryer & Martin Haspelmath (eds.), The world atlas of language structures online. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. Available online at http://wals.info/chapter/87. (accessed 20 March 2015).Google Scholar

  • Dryer, Matthew S. & Martin Haspelmath (eds.). 2013. The world atlas of language structures online. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. Available online at http://wals.info (accessed 20 March 2015).Google Scholar

  • Fodor, Jerry. 1970. Three reasons for not deriving “kill” from “cause to die.” Linguistic Inquiry 1(4). 429–438.Google Scholar

  • Givón, Talmy. 2001. Syntax: An introduction, Vol. II. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

  • Goldberg, Adele E. 2005. Argument realization: The role of constructions, lexical semantics and discourse factors. In Jan-Ola Östman & Miriam Fried (eds.), Construction grammars: Cognitive grounding and theoretical extensions, 17–43. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

  • Greenacre, Michael. 2007. Correspondence analysis in practice, 2nd edn. Boca Raton, FL: Chapman and Hall/CRC Press.Google Scholar

  • Haiman, John. 1983. Iconic and economic motivation. Language 59(4). 781–819.Google Scholar

  • Hartmann, Iren, Martin Haspelmath & Michael Cysouw. 2014. Identifying semantic role clusters and alignment types via microrole coexpression tendencies. Studies in Language 38(3). 463–484.Google Scholar

  • Haspelmath, Martin. 1993. More on the typology of inchoative/causative verb alternations. In Bernard Comrie & Maria Polinsky (eds.), Causatives and transitivity, 87–120. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

  • Haspelmath, Martin. 2008. Frequency vs. iconicity in explaining grammatical asymmetries. Cognitive Linguistics 19(1). 1–33.Google Scholar

  • Haspelmath, Martin. 2010. Comparative concepts and descriptive categories in cross-linguistic studies. Language 86(3). 663–687.Google Scholar

  • Haspelmath, Martin. 2011. The indeterminacy of word segmentation and the nature of morphology and syntax. Folia Linguistica 45(1). 31–80.Google Scholar

  • Haspelmath, Martin, Andreea Calude, Michael Spagnol, Heiko Narrog & Elif Bamyaci. 2014. Coding causal–noncausal verb alternations: A form–frequency correspondence explanation. Journal of Linguistics 50(3). 587–625.Google Scholar

  • Hothorn, Torsten, Kurt Hornik & Achim Zeileis. 2006. Unbiased recursive partitioning: A conditional inference framework. Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics 15(3). 651–674.Google Scholar

  • Kemmer, Suzanne & Arie Verhagen. 1994. The grammar of causatives and the conceptual structure of events. Cognitive Linguistics 5(2). 115–156.Google Scholar

  • Kulikov, Leonid I. 2001. Causatives. In Martin Haspelmath, Ekkehard König, Wolfgang Oesterreicher, & Wolfgang Raible (eds.), Language typology and language universals: An international handbook, 886–898. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

  • Kulikov, Leonid I. & Vladimir P. Nedjalkov. 1992. Questionnaire zur Kausativierung. Zeitschrift für Phonetik, Sprachwissenschaft und Kommunikationsforschung 45(2). 137–149.Google Scholar

  • Levshina, Natalia. 2015. European analytic causatives as a comparative concept: Evidence from a parallel corpus of film subtitles. Folia Linguistica 49(2). 487–520.Google Scholar

  • Levshina, Natalia. 2016. Verbs of letting in Germanic and Romance languages: A quantitative investigation based on a parallel corpus of film subtitles. Languages in Contrast 16(1). 84–117.Google Scholar

  • Levshina, Natalia. 2017. Online film subtitles as a corpus: An n-gram approach. To appear in Corpora 12(3).Google Scholar

  • Levshina, Natalia, Dirk Geeraerts & Dirk Speelman. 2013. Mapping constructional spaces: A contrastive analysis of English and Dutch analytic causatives. Linguistics 51(4). 825–854.Google Scholar

  • Malchukov, Andrej, Martin Haspelmath & Bernard Comrie. 2010. Ditransitive constructions: A typological overview. In Andrej Malchukov, Martin Haspelmath & Bernard Comrie (eds.), Studies in ditransitive constructions: A comparative handbook, 1–64. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar

  • Nedjalkov, Vladimir. 1976. Kausativkonstruktionen. Tübingen: TBL.Google Scholar

  • Nedjalkov, Vladimir & Georgij Sil’nickij 1973. Typologie der kausativen Konstruktionen. Folia Linguistica 6(3/4). 273–290.Google Scholar

  • Nenadić, Oleg & Michael Greenacre. 2007. Correspondence analysis in R, with two- and three-dimensional graphics: The ca package. Journal of Statistical Software 20(3). 1–13. Retrieved from http://www.jstatsoft.org/v20/i03/ (accessed 12 April 2015).Google Scholar

  • Quasthoff, Uwe, Dirk Goldhahn & Thomas Eckart. 2014. Building large resources for text mining: The Leipzig Corpora Collection. In Chries Biemann & Alexander Mehler (eds.), Text miningFrom ontology learning to automated text processing applications, 3–24. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.Google Scholar

  • R Core Team. 2015. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. Retrieved from http://www.R-project.org/ (accessed 12 January 2015).

  • Soares da Silva, Augusto. 2012. Stages of grammaticalization of causative verbs and constructions in Portuguese, Spanish, French and Italian. Folia Linguistica 46(2). 513–552.Google Scholar

  • Strobl, Carolin, Anne-Laure Boulesteix, Thomas Kneib, Thomas Augustin & Achim Zeileis 2008. Conditional variable importance for random forests. BMC Bioinformatics 9: 307. Retrieved from http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2105/9/307 (accessed 17 March 2015)Google Scholar

  • Talmy, Leonard. 2000. Toward a cognitive semantics, Vol. 1. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

  • Tagliamonte, Sali & R. Harald Baayen. 2012. Models, forests and trees of York English: Was/were variation as a case study for statistical practice. Language Variation and Change 24(2). 135–178.Google Scholar

  • Tiedemann, Jörg. 2012. Parallel data, tools and interfaces in OPUS. In Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC-2012), 2214–2218. Istanbul. Available at www.lrec conf.org/proceedings/lrec2012/pdf/463 Paper.pdf.

  • van der Auwera, Johan, Volker Gast & Jaroen Vanderbiesen. 2012. Human impersonal pronouns in English, Dutch and German. Leuvense Bijdragen 98. 27–64Google Scholar

  • Vendler, Zeno. 1957. Verbs and times. The Philosophical Review 66(2). 143–160.Google Scholar

  • von Waldenfels, Ruprecht. 2012. The grammaticalization of “give”+infinitive: A comparative study of Russian, Polish and Czech. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar

  • Wälchli, Bernhard & Michael Cysouw. 2012. Lexical typology through similarity semantics: Toward a semantic map of motion verbs. Linguistics 50(3). 671–710.Google Scholar

About the article

Received: 2015-05-25

Revised: 2015-11-17

Revised: 2016-02-09

Accepted: 2016-05-31

Published Online: 2016-11-08

Published in Print: 2016-11-01


Citation Information: Folia Linguistica, ISSN (Online) 1614-7308, ISSN (Print) 0165-4004, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/flin-2016-0019.

Export Citation

©2016 by De Gruyter Mouton. Copyright Clearance Center

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in