Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

The Forum

A Journal of Applied Research in Contemporary Politics

Ed. by Disalvo, Daniel / Stonecash, Jeffrey

4 Issues per year

IMPACT FACTOR 2016: 0.397

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2016: 0.476
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2016: 0.331

See all formats and pricing
More options …
Volume 3, Issue 1 (Mar 2005)


Politics and Professional Advancement Among College Faculty

Stanley Rothman / S. Robert Lichter / Neil Nevitte
Published Online: 2005-03-29 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.2202/1540-8884.1067

This article first examines the ideological composition of American university faculty and then tests whether ideological homogeneity has become self-reinforcing. A randomly based national survey of 1643 faculty members from 183 four-year colleges and universities finds that liberals and Democrats outnumber conservatives and Republicans by large margins, and the differences are not limited to elite universities or to the social sciences and humanities. A multivariate analysis finds that, even after taking into account the effects of professional accomplishment, along with many other individual characteristics, conservatives and Republicans teach at lower quality schools than do liberals and Democrats. This suggests that complaints of ideologically-based discrimination in academic advancement deserve serious consideration and further study. The analysis finds similar effects based on gender and religiosity, i.e., women and practicing Christians teach at lower quality schools than their professional accomplishments would predict.

About the article

Published Online: 2005-03-29

Citation Information: The Forum, ISSN (Online) 1540-8884, DOI: https://doi.org/10.2202/1540-8884.1067.

Export Citation

©2011 Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co. KG, Berlin/Boston. Copyright Clearance Center

Citing Articles

Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.

Amanda Rutherford and Jon Lozano
Public Administration Review, 2017
Louis Bolce and Gerald De Maio
American Politics Research, 2008, Volume 36, Number 2, Page 155
Lee Jussim
Perspectives on Psychological Science, 2012, Volume 7, Number 5, Page 504
S. Douglas Beets
Journal of Academic Ethics, 2015, Volume 13, Number 4, Page 311
Karen Gift and Thomas Gift
Political Behavior, 2015, Volume 37, Number 3, Page 653
Noel Mark Noël, Philip Trocchia, and Michael Luckett
Journal of Education for Business, 2015, Volume 90, Number 6, Page 306
Jana M. Hanson, Dustin D. Weeden, Ernest T. Pascarella, and Charles Blaich
Higher Education, 2012, Volume 64, Number 3, Page 355
Bas van der Vossen
Philosophical Psychology, 2015, Volume 28, Number 7, Page 1045
David R. Hodge
Journal of Religion & Spirituality in Social Work: Social Thought, 2007, Volume 26, Number 2, Page 91
Mark V. Brow, Jenny Yau, Ying Hong Jiang, and Patricia Bonner
Journal of Research on Christian Education, 2014, Volume 23, Number 2, Page 187
Ethan Blue, Michael Levine, and Dean Nieusma
Synthesis Lectures on Engineers, Technology and Society, 2013, Volume 7, Number 3, Page 1
Jonathan Haidt
Journal of Moral Education, 2013, Volume 42, Number 3, Page 281
David R. Hodge
Journal of Religion & Spirituality in Social Work: Social Thought, 2009, Volume 28, Number 1-2, Page 8
Presidential Studies Quarterly, 2012, Volume 42, Number 3, Page 514
American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 2011, Volume 70, Number 4, Page 1053
Joseph Losco and Ione DeOllos
Journal of Political Science Education, 2007, Volume 3, Number 3, Page 251
Robert J. MacCoun and Susannah Paletz
Political Psychology, 2009, Volume 30, Number 1, Page 43

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in