Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details

The Forum

A Journal of Applied Research in Contemporary Politics

Ed. by Disalvo, Daniel / Stonecash, Jeffrey


IMPACT FACTOR 2015: 0.250
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 0.318

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2015: 0.255
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2015: 0.296
Impact per Publication (IPP) 2015: 0.191

49,00 € / $74.00 / £37.00*

Online
ISSN
1540-8884
See all formats and pricing



Select Volume and Issue

Issues

30,00 € / $42.00 / £23.00

Get Access to Full Text

Why the "Death Panel" Myth Wouldn't Die: Misinformation in the Health Care Reform Debate

Brendan Nyhan1

1University of Michigan, Ann Arbor

Citation Information: The Forum. Volume 8, Issue 1, ISSN (Online) 1540-8884, DOI: 10.2202/1540-8884.1354, April 2010

Publication History

Published Online:
2010-04-27

Both Bill Clinton and Barack Obama struggled to overcome widespread and persistent myths about their proposals to reform the American health care system. Their difficulties highlight the influence of factual misinformation in national politics and the extent to which it correlates with citizens' political views. In this essay, I explain how greater elite polarization and the growth in media choice have reinforced the partisan divide in factual beliefs. To illustrate these points, I analyze debates over health care reform in 1993–1994 and 2009–2010, tracing the spread of false claims about reform proposals from Bill Clinton and Barack Obama and analyzing the prevalence of misinformation in public opinion. Since false beliefs are extremely difficult to correct, I conclude by arguing that increasing the reputational costs for dishonest elites might be a more effective approach to improving democratic discourse.

Keywords: health care; health care reform; Barack Obama; Bill Clinton; Betsy McCaughey; Sarah Palin; no exit; death panel; euthanasia

Citing Articles

Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.

[1]
PAULA M. LANTZ, W. DOUGLAS EVANS, HOLLY MEAD, CARMEN ALVAREZ, and LISA STEWART
The Milbank Quarterly, 2016, Volume 94, Number 1, Page 51
[3]
Patrick C. Meirick and Elena Bessarabova
Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, 2015, Page n/a
[4]
Kjerstin Thorson and Chris Wells
Communication Theory, 2015, Page n/a
[5]
Luke Greenacre, Sarah Patrick, Rongbin Yang, Victoria Jaeger, and James Martin
Food Quality and Preference, 2016, Volume 48, Page 93
[6]
Josh Pasek, Gaurav Sood, and Jon A. Krosnick
Journal of Communication, 2015, Page n/a
[7]
Cecilie Gaziano
Open Journal of Political Science, 2013, Volume 03, Number 04, Page 116
[8]
Brendan Nyhan and Jason Reifler
American Journal of Political Science, 2014, Page n/a
[9]
Aaron S. Veenstra, Mohammad Delwar Hossain, and Benjamin A. Lyons
Mass Communication and Society, 2014, Volume 17, Number 6, Page 874
[10]
Amanda E. Hunsaker and Aaron Mann
Journal of Human Behavior in the Social Environment, 2013, Volume 23, Number 7, Page 841
[11]
Preston R. Bost and Stephen G. Prunier
Psychological Reports, 2013, Volume 113, Number 1, Page 118
[12]
Erin Sparks and Joyce Ehrlinger
Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2012, Volume 6, Number 5, Page 417
[13]
Amy Gutmann and Dennis Thompson
Perspectives on Politics, 2010, Volume 8, Number 04, Page 1125
[14]
Jacob S. Hacker
Perspectives on Politics, 2010, Volume 8, Number 03, Page 861

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.