Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

The Forum

A Journal of Applied Research in Contemporary Politics

Ed. by Disalvo, Daniel / Stonecash, Jeffrey


IMPACT FACTOR 2018: 0.500
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 0.623

CiteScore 2018: 0.83

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.595
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 0.631

Online
ISSN
1540-8884
See all formats and pricing
More options …
Volume 8, Issue 1

Issues

After the "Housequake": Leadership and Partisanship in the Post-2006 House

David E Price
Published Online: 2010-04-27 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.2202/1540-8884.1361

The congressional election of 2006 was arguably a "Housequake." But how momentous have the changes been for how the House operates and the policy it produces? An answer to that question requires particular attention to two interrelated institutional factors: leadership and partisanship. A closer look at three episodes involving the Appropriations Committee—the breakdown of the markup process in 2008 and battles over open rules and "motions to recommit" in 2009—reveals the extent to which the struggle for partisan advantage is trumping norms that buttress the institutional role of Appropriations and of the House. Congress needs both partisan and bipartisan capacity, but the latter is in a dangerously weakened state.

Keywords: Congress; partisanship; appropriations

About the article

Published Online: 2010-04-27


Citation Information: The Forum, Volume 8, Issue 1, ISSN (Online) 1540-8884, DOI: https://doi.org/10.2202/1540-8884.1361.

Export Citation

©2011 Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co. KG, Berlin/Boston.Get Permission

Citing Articles

Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.

[2]
Matthew Levendusky
Political Communication, 2013, Volume 30, Number 4, Page 565
[3]
Matthew S. Levendusky
American Journal of Political Science, 2013, Volume 57, Number 3, Page 611

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in