Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
Weitere Optionen …

The Forum

A Journal of Applied Research in Contemporary Politics

Hrsg. v. Disalvo, Daniel / Stonecash, Jeffrey

IMPACT FACTOR 2018: 0.500
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 0.623

CiteScore 2018: 0.83

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.595
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 0.631

Alle Formate und Preise
Weitere Optionen …
Band 9, Heft 4


Legislative Coalitions, Polarization, and the U.S. Senate

Daniel DiSalvo
Online erschienen: 03.01.2011 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.2202/1540-8884.1481

In recent years, scholars have marshaled a vast amount of evidence to show that the congressional parties are increasingly polarized. However, David Mayhew demonstrated that most standard legislative enactments in the second half of the twentieth century passed with the support of large majorities of both parties. This article investigates whether the partisan polarization of the past two decades has crept into the temple of consensual lawmaking that hitherto characterized Senate action on final passage votes. The findings reveal that unilateral votes by one party are better explained by unified government than the rise of partisan polarization. In that light, the import of polarization may be overstated. Institutional features of the political system, coupled with the electoral incentives of lawmakers, offset ideological polarization at the final passage stage of important legislation.

Keywords: Senate; Polarization; Parties; Lawmaking


Online erschienen: 03.01.2011

Quellenangabe: The Forum, Band 9, Heft 4, ISSN (Online) 1540-8884, DOI: https://doi.org/10.2202/1540-8884.1481.

Zitat exportieren

©2011 Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co. KG, Berlin/Boston.Get Permission

Kommentare (0)