Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
In This Section

The Forum

A Journal of Applied Research in Contemporary Politics

Ed. by Disalvo, Daniel / Stonecash, Jeffrey

4 Issues per year

IMPACT FACTOR 2015: 0.250
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 0.318

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2015: 0.255
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2015: 0.296
Impact per Publication (IPP) 2015: 0.191

See all formats and pricing
In This Section

Voting vs. Thinking: Unified Partisan Voting Does Not Imply Unified Partisan Beliefs

Jeremy C. Pope
  • Brigham Young University
Published Online: 2012-10-31 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/1540-8884.1516


The Myth of the Independent Voter crystallized views that were becoming accepted in political science and began an effort to convince the press that self-described independent voters were not truly independent, but that these “leaners” were really closet partisans. Despite the success of that book, its argument has come with a cost. Most especially, a misrepresentation of the argument can play into the myth of a deeply polarized electorate. When scrutinized closely, it becomes clear that Americans often vote in a highly partisan way, yet they are far less likely to think in a clearly partisan fashion. All partisans, but especially weak partisans and independent leaners, disagree frequently with their respective parties. Indeed, just as we no longer see independents as a united block, we should avoid making claims that partisans are united, because even though these partisans often vote alike, they do not always think alike.

Keywords: independent voter; unified partisan voting

About the article

Published Online: 2012-10-31

Citation Information: The Forum, ISSN (Online) 1540-8884, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/1540-8884.1516. Export Citation

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in