Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

The Forum

A Journal of Applied Research in Contemporary Politics

Ed. by Disalvo, Daniel / Stonecash, Jeffrey

4 Issues per year

IMPACT FACTOR 2017: 0.536

CiteScore 2017: 0.48

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2017: 0.265
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2017: 0.723

See all formats and pricing
More options …
Volume 10, Issue 4


Negative, Angry, and Ubiquitous: Political Advertising in 2012

Erika Franklin Fowler / Travis N. Ridout
  • Corresponding author
  • Associate Professor and Thomas S. Foley Distinguished Professor of Government and Public Policy, School of Politics, Philosophy and Public Affairs, Washington State University, Johnson Tower, Troy Lane, Pullman, 99164-4800 Washington, DC, USA
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
Published Online: 2013-02-09 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/forum-2013-0004


Record amounts of money went to purchase television advertising during the 2012 election cycle, resulting in unprecedented volumes of advertising. This increase was due in part to the ease with which outside groups, such as super PACs, were able to raise and spend advertising dollars in the current, post-Citizens United, regulatory regime. Advertising in 2012 was also extremely negative, especially at the presidential level, and frequently evoked the emotion of anger. Yet whether 2012 marks the high point for spending on advertising – and whether the negativity will abate in the next presidential election – remain open questions.


  • Brooks, Deborah Jordan, and Michael Murov. 2012. “Assessing Accountability in a Post-Citizens United Era The Effects of Attack ad Sponsorship by Unknown Independent Groups.” American Politics Research 40 (3): 383–418.Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Feltus, William. “Telephone Interview with Travis Ridout.” December 3, 2012.Google Scholar

  • Fowler, Erika Franklin and Travis N. Ridout. 2009. “Local Television and Newspaper Coverage of Political Advertising.” Political Communication 26 (2): 119–136.CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Geer, John G. 2012. “The News Media and the Rise of Negativity in Presidential Campaigns.” PS: Political Science and Politics 45 (3): 422–427.Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kay, Tim. “Telephone Interview with Travis Ridout.” December 12, 2012.Google Scholar

  • Lau, Richard R., Lee Sigelman, and Ivy Brown Rovner. 2007. “The Effects of Negative Political Campaigns: A Meta-Analytic Reassessment.” Journal of Politics 69 (4): 1176–1209.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Napoli, Philip M. 2011. Audience Evolution: New Technologies and the Transformation of Media Audiences. New York City: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar

  • Ridout, Travis N., and Erika Franklin Fowler. 2012. “Explaining Perceptions of Advertising Tone.” Political Research Quarterly 65 (1): 62–75.CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Ridout, Travis N., Michael M. Franz, Kenneth M. Goldstein and William J. Feltus. 2012. “Separation by Television Program: Understanding the Targeting of Political Advertising in Presidential Elections.” Political Communication 29 (1): 1–23.Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Roebuck, Jeremy. “With Little Return on Big ad Buys, Campaign Strategists Rethinking for 2014.” Philadephia Inquirer, December 4, 2012. Accessed December 14, 2012. http://articles.philly.com/2012-12-04/news/35572519_1_sunlight-foundation-pacs-tv-ad.

About the article

Erika Franklin Fowler

Erika Franklin Fowler is Assistant Professor of Government at Wesleyan University and Co-Director of the Wesleyan Media Project. She specializes in political communication – local media and campaign advertising in particular – and her work on local news coverage of politics and policy has been published in political science, communication, law/policy, and medical journals.

Travis N. Ridout

Travis N. Ridout is Thomas S. Foley Distinguished Professor of Government and Public Policy and Associate Professor in the School of Politics, Philosophy and Public Affairs at Washington State University. He is also co-director of the Wesleyan Media Project. He is author of The Persuasive Power of Campaign Advertising (Temple University Press, 2011).

Corresponding author: Erika Franklin Fowler, Assistant Professor, Department of Government, Wesleyan University, 238 Church Street, Middletown, CT 06459, USA

Published Online: 2013-02-09

The analyses presented here are based on ongoing coding, which is 97% complete for presidential airings between April 11 and Election Day, 2012, and 88% complete for congressional (House and Senate) airings between June 1 and Election Day, 2012.

Only about 68,000 of those spots aired on national television at a cost of $350 million.

A difference in cost per ad could also result if the campaigns systematically chose to air their ads at different times of day, during different programs that drew larger or smaller audiences, or due to paying premiums for non-pre-emptible time. While the campaigns did target different audiences, there no evidence that, say, Obama was buying a ton of cheap ads at 2 a.m. while Romney was buying expensive prime-time ads.

Note that no data are available for 2006.

Citation Information: The Forum, Volume 10, Issue 4, Pages 51–61, ISSN (Online) 1540-8884, ISSN (Print) 2194-6183, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/forum-2013-0004.

Export Citation

©2013 by Walter de Gruyter Berlin Boston.Get Permission

Citing Articles

Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.

Andrew J. Clarke, Thomas R. Gray, and Adam G. Hughes
Journal of Political Marketing, 2018, Page 1
Patrícia Rossini, Jennifer Stromer-Galley, Kate Kenski, Jeff Hemsley, Feifei Zhang, and Brian Dobreski
Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 2018, Page 1
Taewoo Kang, Erika Franklin Fowler, Michael M. Franz, and Travis N. Ridout
Political Communication, 2017, Page 1
Heather K. Evans, Sean Smith, Alexis Gonzales, and Kayla Strouse
Social Media + Society, 2017, Volume 3, Number 2, Page 205630511770440
Kevin M. Wagner, Jason Gainous, and Mirya R. Holman
Journal of Women, Politics & Policy, 2017, Page 1
Pénélope Daignault, Audrey Dupuis, Maxime Boivin, and Mikaël Guillemette
Communication, 2016, Number vol. 34/1
Hans J. G. Hassell and Kelly R. Oeltjenbruns
American Politics Research, 2016, Volume 44, Number 2, Page 222
Yanna Krupnikov and Spencer Piston
Political Communication, 2015, Volume 32, Number 1, Page 152
Yanna Krupnikov
Political Communication, 2014, Volume 31, Number 3, Page 446

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in