Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

The Forum

A Journal of Applied Research in Contemporary Politics

Ed. by Disalvo, Daniel / Stonecash, Jeffrey

4 Issues per year


IMPACT FACTOR 2016: 0.397

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2016: 0.476
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2016: 0.331

Online
ISSN
1540-8884
See all formats and pricing
More options …
Volume 10, Issue 4 (Feb 2013)

Issues

How the Romney Campaign Blew it

William G. Mayer
Published Online: 2013-02-09 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/forum-2013-0005

Abstract

Political scientists have generally been skeptical that presidential campaigns have a significant effect on the final outcome of a presidential election. But 2012, this article argues, was an exception. By all the indicators that political scientists traditionally look to, 2012 had long shaped up to be a very close election. That Mitt Romney lost was due largely to the remarkably inept quality of his campaign, which largely avoided any serious discussion of the issues, even when such discussion would have worked to his advantage.

References

  • Abramowitz, Alan I. 1988. An Improved Model for Predicting Presidential Election Outcomes. PS: Political Science and Politics 21 (Autumn): 843–847.Google Scholar

  • Campbell, James E. 2008. The American Campaign: U.S. Presidential Campaigns and the National Vote. College Station: Texas A&M University Press.Google Scholar

  • Campbell, James E. 2012. Editor’s Introduction. PS: Political Science and Politics 45 (October): 610–612.Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Campbell, James E. 2013. A First Party-Term Incumbent Survives: The Fundamentals and the 2012 Presidential Election. In Barack Obama and the New America: The 2012 Election and the Changing Face of Politics, edited by Larry J. Sabato (forthcoming).Google Scholar

  • Goldberg, Jonah. 2012. De-Bushing Romney. Accessed December 12, 2012. www.nationalreview.com/blogs/print/ 313043.

  • Hibbs, Douglas A. 2012. Obama’s Reelection Prospects Under “Bread And Peace” Voting in the 2012 US Presidential Election. PS: Political Science and Politics 45 (October): 635–639.Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Lazarsfeld, Paul F., Bernard Berelson, and Hazel Gaudet. 1948. The People’s Choice: How the Voter Makes Up His Mind in a Presidential Campaign. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar

  • Neustadt, Richard E. 1955. Presidency and Legislation: Planning the President’s Program. American Political Science Review 49 (December): 980–1021.Google Scholar

  • York, Byron. 2011. Team Romney on Obama: “We will Tie them in Knots.” Washington Examiner, November 26.Google Scholar

About the article

William G. Mayer

William G. Mayer is a professor of political science at Northeastern University. His major areas of research and writing include the presidential nominating process, presidential elections, public opinion, and media and politics. The author would like to thank Matthew Dickinson, James Campbell, and Natalie Mayer for their help in writing this article.


Corresponding author: William G. Mayer, Department of Political Science, Northeastern University, Boston, MA 02115, USA


Received: 2012-12-20

Accepted: 2012-12-26

Published Online: 2013-02-09


I use the June results because in a fair number of early election years, Gallup did not ask the presidential approval question between June and November.

These questions, it should be added, probably overestimate Bush’s standing with the American public, since they measure personal favorability rather than job performance. Through Bush’s final years in office, his favorability ratings were always higher than his approval ratings. That is to say, many Americans considered Bush “a nice guy” but an incompetent president.

He might, for example, have said that Bush increased domestic spending, while he would cut it; or that Bush had enacted several major tax cuts that the nation could not afford, while his tax reforms would be revenue neutral. If Romney had been of a mind to be honest, he could also have promised that if he were required to send US troops into a combat situation, he would plan the postwar occupation far better than Bush had in Iraq.

It is also a largely inaccurate description of how Ronald Reagan operated. While it is true that Reagan provided few specifics about his tax reform plan during his 1984 re-election campaign, he had, in 1980 when he was not an incumbent, offered a quite specific list of the major items in his tax-cut plan – and, once elected, he tried his best to get that plan enacted into law, though he did accept some changes and compromises.

As quoted in Neustadt (1955), p. 1015.

The final RCP average had Obama beating Romney by 0.8%. His actual margin of victory was slightly less than 3%.

In 1994, I helped do issues research (on an unpaid basis) for Romney’s Senate campaign.


Citation Information: The Forum, ISSN (Online) 1540-8884, ISSN (Print) 2194-6183, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/forum-2013-0005.

Export Citation

©2013 by Walter de Gruyter Berlin Boston. Copyright Clearance Center

Citing Articles

Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.

[1]
Roderick P. Hart and Colene J. Lind
American Behavioral Scientist, 2014, Volume 58, Number 4, Page 591

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in