Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

The Forum

A Journal of Applied Research in Contemporary Politics

Ed. by Disalvo, Daniel / Stonecash, Jeffrey

4 Issues per year


IMPACT FACTOR 2016: 0.397

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2016: 0.476
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2016: 0.331

Online
ISSN
1540-8884
See all formats and pricing
More options …
Volume 12, Issue 2 (Jul 2014)

Issues

Disclosing Disclosure: Lessons from a “Failed” Field Experiment

Dick M. Carpenter II
  • Department of Leadership, Research, and Foundations, University of Colorado Colorado Springs, CO, USA
/ David M. Primo
  • Corresponding author
  • Department of Political Science and Simon Business School, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, USA
  • Email:
/ Pavel Tendetnik
  • Department of Leadership, Research, and Foundations, University of Colorado Colorado Springs, CO, USA
/ Sandy Ho
  • Department of Leadership, Research, and Foundations, University of Colorado Colorado Springs, CO, USA
Published Online: 2014-08-08 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/for-2014-5008

Abstract

In a recent issue of The Forum, Fortier and Malbin call for more research into the effects of disclosure requirements for campaign finance. In this paper, we report the results of a field experiment designed to assess whether such rules dissuade potential contributors due to privacy concerns. The paper is unique in that we explain why the field experiment never happened, and what we can learn from its “failure.” Specifically, we show that 2012 Congressional candidates were fearful about letting potential contributors know that their donations would be made available on the Internet, along with their address, employer, and other personal information. In trying to learn directly about whether contributors would be spooked by this knowledge, we ended up learning indirectly, through the actions of candidates, that privacy concerns may in fact limit participation in the political process, including among small donors.

References

  • Ansolabehere, Stephen. 2007. “The Scope of Corruption Lessons from Comparative Campaign Finance Disclosure.” Election Law Journal 6 (2): 163–183.Google Scholar

  • Bipartisan Commission on the Political Reform Act of 1974 (State of California). 2000. Overly Complex and Unduly Burdensome: The Critical Need to Simplify the Political Reform Act of 1974 in California; Final Report and Recommendations. http://www.fppc.ca.gov/pdf/mcpherson.pdf.

  • Briffault, Richard. 2010. “Campaign Finance Disclosure 2.0.” Election Law Journal 9 (4): 273–303.Google Scholar

  • Briffault, Richard. 2011. “Nonprofits and Disclosure in the Wake of Citizens United.” Election Law Journal 10 (4): 337–361.Google Scholar

  • Brusoe, Peter. 2013. “FEC Approves Request to Alert on Political Refunds.” Bloomberg News, http://go.bloomberg.com/political-capital/2013-11-26/fec-approves-request-to-alert-on-political-refunds/?alcmpid=politics.

  • Buckley v. Valeo. 424 U.S. 1 (1976).Google Scholar

  • Carpenter, Dick M., II. 2009. “Mandatory Disclosure for Ballot-Initiative Campaigns.” Independent Review 13 (4): 567–583.Google Scholar

  • Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission. 558 U.S. 310 (2010).Google Scholar

  • Downs, Anthony. 1957. An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper Collins.Google Scholar

  • Federal Election Commission (FEC). 2011. Federal Election Commission Campaign Guide: Congressional Candidates and Committees. August.Google Scholar

  • Fortier, John C., and Michael J. Malbin. 2013. “An Agenda for Future Research on Money and Politics in the United States.” The Forum 11 (3): 455–479.Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Garrett, Elizabeth, and Daniel A. Smith. 2005. “Veiled Political Actors and Campaign Disclosure Laws in Direct Democracy.” Election Law Journal 4 (4): 295–328.Google Scholar

  • Gross, Donald A., and Robert K. Goidel. 2003. The States of Campaign Finance Reform. Columbus, OH: Ohio State University Press.Google Scholar

  • Huckshorn, Robert J. 1985. “Who Gave It? Who Got It?: The Enforcement of Campaign Finance Laws in the States.” Journal of Politics 47 (3): 772–789.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • La Raja, Raymond J. 2007. “Sunshine Laws and the Press: The Effect of Campaign Disclosure on News Reporting in the American States.” Election Law Journal 6 (3): 236–249.Google Scholar

  • La Raja, Raymond J. Forthcoming. “Political Participation and Civic Courage: The Negative Effect of Transparency on Making Small Campaign Contributions.” Political Behavior.Google Scholar

  • Malbin, Michael J. 2013. “Small donors: Incentives, Economies of Scale, and Effects.” The Forum 11 (3): 385–411.Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Malbin, Michael J., and Thomas L. Gais. 1998. The Day After Reform: Sobering Campaign Finance Lessons from the American States. Albany, NY: Rockefeller Institute Press.Google Scholar

  • Mayer, Lloyd Hitoshi. 2010. “Disclosures about Disclosure.” Indiana Law Review 44 (1): 255–284.Google Scholar

  • Milyo, Jeffrey. 2007. “Red Tape: Strangling Free Speech and Political Debate.” Institute for Justice Report, October.Google Scholar

  • Primo David M. 2013. “Information at the Margin: Campaign Finance Disclosure Laws, Ballot Issues, and Voter Knowledge.” Election Law Journal 12 (2): 114–129.Google Scholar

  • Primo, David M., and Jeffrey Milyo. 2006. “Campaign Finance Laws and Political Efficacy: Evidence from the States.” Election Law Journal 5 (1): 23–39.Google Scholar

  • Robb, Alice. 2012. “McCain Addresses Oxford.” The Oxonian Globalist (online), October 11, http://toglobalist.org/2012/10/mccain-addresses-oxford.

  • Schneiderman, Eric T. 2013. A.G. Schneiderman Adopts New Disclosure Requirements For Nonprofits That Engage In Electioneering. Press Release, New York State Office of the Attorney General, http://www.ag.ny.gov/press-release/ag-schneiderman-adopts-new-disclosure-requirements-nonprofits-engage-electioneering.

  • Schultz, David. 2005. “Disclosure Is Not Enough: Empirical Lessons from State Experiences.” Election Law Journal 4 (4): 349–370.Google Scholar

  • U.S. House of Representatives. 2013. “2013 Disclose Act.” H.R. 148, 113th Congress.Google Scholar

  • Werfel, Seth. 2008. “A Modern Paradigm for Campaign Finance: Economic Markets and Lessons from History.” Politics & Policy 36 (5): 776–790.Google Scholar

About the article

Dick M. Carpenter II

Dick M. Carpenter II is a Professor of Leadership, Research, and Foundations at the University of Colorado Colorado Springs.

David M. Primo

David M. Primo is the Ani and Mark Gabrellian Professor at the University of Rochester, and is an expert on campaign finance, fiscal policy, and corporate political strategy.

Pavel Tendetnik

Pavel Tendetnik is a regional strategist in the US Air Force and a recent PhD recipient from the University of Colorado Colorado Springs. (Work and conclusions produced here are personal and should not be attributed to the US Air Force or the Department of Defense.)

Sandy Ho

Sandy Ho works in higher education student affairs and is a doctoral student at the University of Colorado Colorado Springs with research interests in mentorship, research, and policy.


Corresponding author: David M. Primo: Department of Political Science and Simon Business School, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, USA, e-mail:


Published Online: 2014-08-08

Published in Print: 2014-07-01


Citation Information: The Forum, ISSN (Online) 1540-8884, ISSN (Print) 2194-6183, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/for-2014-5008.

Export Citation

©2014 by De Gruyter. Copyright Clearance Center

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in