Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

The Forum

A Journal of Applied Research in Contemporary Politics

Ed. by Stonecash, Jeffrey / Hopkins, David


IMPACT FACTOR 2018: 0.500
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 0.623

CiteScore 2018: 0.83

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.595
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 0.631

Online
ISSN
1540-8884
See all formats and pricing
More options …
Volume 12, Issue 4

Issues

Political Advertising in 2014: The Year of the Outside Group

Erika Franklin Fowler
  • Corresponding author
  • Department of Government, 238 Church Street, Wesleyan University, Middletown, 06459 Connecticut, USA
  • Email
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
/ Travis N. Ridout
  • School of Politics, Philosophy and Public Affairs, 816 Johnson Tower, Troy Lane, Washington State University, Pullman, 99164-4880 Washington, USA
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
Published Online: 2015-01-28 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/for-2014-5030

Abstract

The volume of televised political advertising plateaued in 2014, as did levels of negativity. Yet the most interesting story about this advertising was the extensive involvement of outside groups, many of which did not disclose their donors. In many of the most competitive Senate races, groups surpassed the parties – and sometimes even the candidates – as the primary sponsors of political advertising. We speculate on what these patterns from 2014 are likely to mean for advertising in 2016.

References

  • Brooks, Deborah Jordan, and Michael Murov. 2012. “Assessing Accountability in a Post-Citizens United Era: The Effects of Attack Ad Sponsorship by Unknown Independent Groups.” American Politics Research 40 (3): 383–418.CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Dowling, Conor M., and Amber Wichowsky. Accepted for Publication. “Attacks without Consequence? Candidates, Parties, Groups, and the Changing Face of Negative Advertising.” American Journal of Political Science.Google Scholar

  • Goldmacher, Shane. 2014. “The Actual Intention Behind That Awkward Mitch McConnell Video.” National Journal, March 12.Google Scholar

  • Issenberg, Sasha. 2012. The Victory Lab: The Secret Science of Winning Campaigns. Random House, New York: Crown Publishers.Google Scholar

  • Johnson, Tyler, Johanna Dunaway, and Christopher R. Weber. 2011. “Consider the Source: Variations in the Effects of Negative Campaign Messages.” Journal of Integrated Social Sciences 2 (1): 98–127.Google Scholar

  • Klimas, Jacqueline. 2014. “Online Campaign Ads May Prove Decisive in Midterm Elections.” The Washington Times, September 24.Google Scholar

  • Kucinich, Jackie. 2014. “For Planned Parenthood Votes and Americans for Prosperity in N.C., It’s All about the Ground Game.” The Washington Post, October 29.Google Scholar

  • Ridout, Travis N., Michael M. Franz, and Erika Franklin Fowler. Accepted for Publication. “Sponsorship, Disclosure and Donors: Limiting the Impact of Outside Group Ads.” Political Research Quarterly.Google Scholar

  • Rucker, Philip, Robert Costa, and Matea Gold. 2014. “Unlike Previous Midterm Election Years, No Dominant Theme Has Emerged for 2014.” The Washington Post, August 9.Google Scholar

  • Weber, Christopher, Johanna Dunaway, and Tyler Johnson. 2012. “It’s All in the Name: Source Cue Ambiguity and the Persuasive Appeal of Campaign Ads.” Political Behavior 34 (3): 561–584.CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

About the article

Erika Franklin Fowler

Erika Franklin Fowler is Assistant Professor of Government at Wesleyan University and Co-Director of the Wesleyan Media Project. She specializes in political communication – local media and campaign advertising in particular – and her work on local news coverage of politics and policy has been published in political science, communication, law/policy, and medical journals.

Travis N. Ridout

Travis N. Ridout is Thomas S. Foley Distinguished Professor of Government and Public Policy and Associate Professor in the School of Politics, Philosophy, and Public Affairs at Washington State University. He is Co-Director of the Wesleyan Media Project and author of The Persuasive Power of Campaign Advertising (Temple University Press, 2011).


Corresponding author: Erika Franklin Fowler, Department of Government, 238 Church Street, Wesleyan University, Middletown, 06459 Connecticut, USA, e-mail:


Published Online: 2015-01-28

Published in Print: 2014-12-01


Citation Information: The Forum, Volume 12, Issue 4, Pages 663–684, ISSN (Online) 1540-8884, ISSN (Print) 2194-6183, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/for-2014-5030.

Export Citation

©2014 by De Gruyter.Get Permission

Citing Articles

Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.

[1]
Daniel E. Chand
Business and Politics, 2017, Volume 19, Number 3, Page 454
[2]
Daron Shaw, Christopher Blunt, and Brent Seaborn
Political Research Quarterly, 2017, Page 106591291773857
[3]
Robin Kolodny and Diana Dwyre
American Politics Research, 2017, Page 1532673X1771989
[4]
Bethany Albertson and Shana Kushner Gadarian
Political Communication, 2016, Volume 33, Number 4, Page 681
[5]
Leticia Bode, David S. Lassen, Young Mie Kim, Dhavan V. Shah, Erika Franklin Fowler, Travis Ridout, and Michael Franz
Online Information Review, 2016, Volume 40, Number 5, Page 580
[6]
Michael M. Franz, Erika Franklin Fowler, and Travis N. Ridout
American Journal of Political Science, 2016, Volume 60, Number 3, Page 738

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in