Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
In This Section

The Forum

A Journal of Applied Research in Contemporary Politics

Ed. by Disalvo, Daniel / Stonecash, Jeffrey

4 Issues per year


IMPACT FACTOR 2016: 0.397

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2016: 0.476
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2016: 0.331

Online
ISSN
1540-8884
See all formats and pricing
In This Section
Volume 14, Issue 1 (Apr 2016)

Issues

Race, Class, Religion and the Southern Party System: A Field Report from Dixie

M.V. Hood III
  • Corresponding author
  • Department of Political Science, University of Georgia, 104 Baldwin Hall, Athens, GA 30602, USA
  • Email:
Published Online: 2016-04-22 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/for-2016-0007

Abstract

The purpose of this essay is to provide a contemporary examination of the political party system in the Southern US. In doing so, an assessment is undertaken to determine which cleavage line – race, class, or religion – does the best job of explaining the division between Republicans and Democrats in the region. Using survey research data from the 2012 Cooperative Congressional Election Study three multivariate models are employed to study partisan affiliation, presidential voting, and voting in US Senate elections. The results indicate that race, especially the Black-White dichotomy, is the largest dividing line between the Republican and Democratic Parties in the region. In fact, in terms of party identification race dwarfs the effects of religion and class. As related to presidential and Senate voting behavior race continues to exert a significant influence, even after controlling for partisan identification. Conversely, class and religion produced minimal or no effects in models of vote choice. In conclusion, it would appear that the contemporary Southern political landscape, like its predecessor, continues to be defined by racial divisions.

References

  • Ansolabehere, Stephen, and Brian Schaffner. 2013. “CCES Common Content, 2012.” http://hdl.handle.net/1902.1/21447, Harvard Dataverse, V8.

  • Black, Earl, and Merle Black. 1987. Politics and Society in the South. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

  • Green, John C., James L. Guth, Corwin E. Smidt, and Lyman A. Kellstedt. 1996. Religion and the Culture Wars. New York: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar

  • Green, John C., Lyman Kellstedt, Corwin E. Smidt, and James L. Guth. 2014. “The Soul of the South.” In The New Politics of the Old South, 5th ed. edited by Charles S. Bullock, III, and Mark J. Rozell, New York: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar

  • Hanmer, Michael J., and Kerem Ozan Kalkan. 2013. “Behind the Curve: Clarifying the Best Approach to Calculating Predicted Probabilities and Marginal Effects from Limited Dependent Variable Models.” American Journal of Political Science 57 (1): 263–277.Google Scholar

  • Hood, III. M. V., Quentin Kidd, and Irwin L. Morris. 2012. The Rational Southerner: Black Mobilization, Republican Growth, and the Partisan Transformation of the American South. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

  • Kellstedt, Lyman A. 1989. “Evangelicals and Political Realignment.” In Contemporary Evangelical Political Involvement, edited by Corwin E. Smidt, New York: University Press of America.Google Scholar

  • Key, Jr., V.O. 1949. Southern Politics in State and Nation. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar

  • Lublin, David. 2004. The Republican South: Democratization and Partisan Change. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

  • McKee, Seth C., and Melanie J. Springer. 2015. “A Tale of “Two Souths”: White Voting Behavior in Contemporary Southern Elections.” Social Science Quarterly 96 (2): 588–607.Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Nadeau, Richard, Richard G. Niemi, Harold W. Stanley, and Jean-Francois Godbout. 2004. “Class, Party, and South/Non-South Differences.” American Politics Research 32 (1): 52–67.Google Scholar

  • Shafer, Byron E., and R. G. C. Johnston. 2006. The End of Southern Exceptionalism: Class, Race, and Partisan Change in the Postwar South. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

  • Wilcox, Clyde. 2000. Onward Christian Soldiers. 2nd ed. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar

About the article

M.V. Hood III

M.V. (Trey) Hood III is a Professor of political science at the University of Georgia where he conducts research in American politics and policy. He is co-author of The Rational Southerner: Black Mobilization, Republican Growth, and the Partisan Transformation of the American South.


Published Online: 2016-04-22

Published in Print: 2016-04-01


Citation Information: The Forum, ISSN (Online) 1540-8884, ISSN (Print) 2194-6183, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/for-2016-0007.

Export Citation

©2016 by De Gruyter. Copyright Clearance Center

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in