Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

The Forum

A Journal of Applied Research in Contemporary Politics

Ed. by Disalvo, Daniel / Stonecash, Jeffrey

4 Issues per year


IMPACT FACTOR 2016: 0.397

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2016: 0.476
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2016: 0.331

Online
ISSN
1540-8884
See all formats and pricing
More options …
Volume 14, Issue 4 (Dec 2016)

Issues

The Unexceptional Gender Gap of 2016

Barry C. Burden
  • Corresponding author
  • University of Wisconsin-Madison
  • Email:
/ Evan Crawford
  • Corresponding author
  • University of Wisconsin-Madison
  • Email:
/ Michael G. DeCrescenzo
  • Corresponding author
  • University of Wisconsin-Madison
  • Email:
Published Online: 2017-02-22 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/for-2016-0039

Abstract

Because of the particular candidates who ran, the 2016 presidential campaign was defined by gender to a remarkable degree. This led many observers to expect a historically large gender gap in voting. In contrast to these expectations, the gender gap between men and women’s votes in 2016 was only slightly larger than in other recent elections. We argue that an immense gender divide did not emerge because it was constrained by high levels of partisanship in the electorate, especially “negative partisanship” toward the opposing party that leaves little room for gender to matter. In addition, we challenge two common assumptions: that the gender gap helps Democratic candidates and that women were more persuadable than men over the course of the campaign. Both men and women vacillated in their views of Clinton’s honesty during the campaign, with men shifting away from her and toward Trump just before election day.

References

  • Abramowitz, Alan I., and Kyle L. Saunders. 2008. “Ideological Realignment in the U.S. Electorate.” Journal of Politics 60: 634–652.Google Scholar

  • Abramowitz, Alan I., and Steven Webster. 2016. “The Rise of Negative Partisanship and the Nationalization of U.S. Elections in the 21st Century.” Electoral Studies 41: 12–22.Google Scholar

  • Bafumi, Joseph, and Robert Y. Shapiro. 2009. “A New Partisan Voter.” Journal of Politics 71: 1–24.Google Scholar

  • Box-Steffensmeier, Janet M., Suzanna De Boef, and Tse-Min Lin. 2004. “The Dynamics of the Partisan Gender Gap.” American Political Science Review 98: 515–528.Google Scholar

  • Burden, Barry C., and Michael G. DeCrescenzo. 2016. “Mobilization, Persuasion, and the Partisan Fallout of the Gender Gap in U.S. Voting.” Paper presented at Toronto Political Behavior Workshop.Google Scholar

  • Carsey, Thomas M., and Geoffrey C. Layman. 2006. “Changing Sides or Changing Minds? Party Identification and Policy Preferences in the American Electorate.” American Journal of Political Science 50: 464–477.Google Scholar

  • Chaney, Carole Kennedy, R. Michael Alvarez, and Jonathan Nagler. 1998. “Explaining the Gender Gap in U.S. Presidential Elections, 1980–1992.” Political Research Quarterly 51: 311–339.Google Scholar

  • Dolan, Kathleen A. 2014. When Does Gender Matter? Women Candidates and Gender Stereotypes in American Elections. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

  • Fowler, Erika Franklin, Travis N. Ridout, and Michael M. Franz. 2016. “Political Advertising in 2016: The Presidential Election as Outlier?” The Forum 14: 445–469.Google Scholar

  • Hayes, Danny. 2005. “Candidate Qualities through a Partisan Lens: A Theory of Trait Ownership.” American Journal of Political Science 49: 908–923.Google Scholar

  • Iyengar, Shanto, Gaurav Sood, and Yphtach Lelkes. 2012. “Affect, Not Ideology: A Social Identity Perspective on Polarization.” Public Opinion Quarterly 76: 405–431.Google Scholar

  • Iyengar, Shanto, and Sean J. Westwood. 2015. “Fear and Loathing across Party Lines: New Evidence on Group Polarization.” American Journal of Political Science 59: 690–707.Google Scholar

  • Kaufmann, Karen M. 2006. “The Gender Gap.” PS: Political Science & Politics 39: 447–453.Google Scholar

  • Kaufmann, Karen M., and John R. Petrocik. 1999. “The Changing Politics of American Men: Understanding the Sources of the Gender Gap.” American Journal of Political Science 43: 864–887.Google Scholar

  • Levendusky, Matthew. 2009. The Partisan Sort: How Liberals Became Democrats and Conservatives Became Republicans. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

  • Manza, Jeff, and Clem Brooks. 1998. “The Gender Gap in US Presidential Elections: When? Why? Implications?” American Journal of Sociology 103: 1235–1266.Google Scholar

  • Nicholson, Stephen P. 2012. “Polarizing Cues.” American Journal of Political Science 56: 52–66.Google Scholar

About the article

Barry C. Burden

Barry Burden is professor of political science and director of the Elections Research Center at the University of Wisconsin-Madison. His recent publications include The Measure of American Elections (co-edited with Charles Stewart III) and “How Different Forms of Health Matter to Political Participation” in the Journal of Politics (with Jason Fletcher, Pamela Herd, Bradley Jones, and Donald Moynihan).

Evan Crawford

Evan Crawford is a doctoral student at the University of Wisconsin-Madison and a graduate fellow in the Interdisciplinary Training Program at the Wisconsin Center for Education Research. His research interests include elections, voting behavior, and local politics.

Michael G. DeCrescenzo

Michael DeCrescenzo is a doctoral student at the University of Wisconsin-Madison and graduate student assistant to the Elections Research Center. His research interests include elections, public opinion, campaign finance, and statistical methodology.


Published Online: 2017-02-22

Published in Print: 2016-12-01


Citation Information: The Forum, ISSN (Online) 1540-8884, ISSN (Print) 2194-6183, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/for-2016-0039.

Export Citation

©2016 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston. Copyright Clearance Center

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in