Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

The Forum

A Journal of Applied Research in Contemporary Politics

Ed. by Disalvo, Daniel / Stonecash, Jeffrey

IMPACT FACTOR 2018: 0.500
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 0.623

CiteScore 2018: 0.83

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.595
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 0.631

See all formats and pricing
More options …
Volume 14, Issue 4


Political Advertising in 2016: The Presidential Election as Outlier?

Erika Franklin Fowler / Travis N. Ridout
  • Corresponding author
  • Thomas S. Foley Distinguished Professor, School of Politics, Philosophy and Public Affairs, Washington State University, Pullman, WA, USA
  • Email
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
/ Michael M. Franz
  • Corresponding author
  • Associate Professor, Department of Government and Legal Studies, Bowdoin College, Brunswick, ME, USA
  • Email
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
Published Online: 2017-02-22 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/for-2016-0040


The 2016 presidential campaign broke the mold when it comes to patterns of political advertising. Using data from the Wesleyan Media Project, we show the race featured far less advertising than the previous cycle, a huge imbalance in the number of ads across candidates and one candidate who almost ignored discussions of policy. This departure from past patterns, however, was not replicated at the congressional level. We draw some lessons about advertising from the 2016 campaign, suggesting that its seeming lack of effectiveness may owe to the unusual nature of the presidential campaign with one unconventional candidate and the other using an unconventional message strategy, among other non-advertising related factors.


  • Bartels, Larry M. 2014. “Remembering to Forget: A Note on the Duration of Campaign Advertising Effects.” Political Communication 31 (4): 532–544.Google Scholar

  • Brooks, Deborah Jordan, and John G. Geer. 2007. “Beyond Negativity: The Effects of Incivility on the Electorate.” American Journal of Political Science 51 (1): 1–16.Google Scholar

  • Fowler, Erika Franklin, Michael Franz, and Travis Ridout. 2016. Political Advertising in the United States. Boulder, Co.: Westview Press.Google Scholar

  • Fridkin, Kim, and John G. Geer. 1994. “Creating Impressions: An Experimental Investigation of Political Advertising on Television.” Political Behavior 16 (1): 93–116.Google Scholar

  • Hill, Seth, James Lo, Lynn Vavreck, and John Zaller. 2013. “How Quickly We Forget: The Duration of Persuasion Effects from Mass Communication.” Political Communication 30 (4): 521–547.Google Scholar

  • Hillygus, D. Sunshine, and Todd G. Shields. 2007. The Persuadable Voter: Wedge Issues in Presidential Campaigns. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

  • Gerber, Alan S., James G. Gimpel, Donald P. Green, and Daron R. Shaw. 2011. “How Large and Long-Lasting Are the Persuasive Effects of Televised Campaign Ads? Results from a Randomized Field Experiment.” American Political Science Review 105 (1): 135–150.Google Scholar

  • Mattes, Kyle, and David P. Redlawsk. 2014. The Positive Case for Negative Campaigning. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

  • Pinkleton, Bruce. 1997. “The Effects of Negative Comparative Political Advertising on Candidate Evaluations and Advertising Evaluations: An Exploration.” Journal of Advertising 26 (1): 19–29.Google Scholar

  • Ridout, Travis N., and Michael M. Franz. 2007. The Persuasive Power of Campaign Advertising. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.Google Scholar

  • Sides, John, and Lynn Vavreck. 2014. The Gamble. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

  • Zaller, John. 1992. The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

About the article

Erika Franklin Fowler

Erika Franklin Fowler is Associate Professor Government at Wesleyan University and serves as co-director of the Wesleyan Media Project, which tracks political advertising in the United States.

Travis N. Ridout

Travis N. Ridout is Thomas S. Foley Distinguished Professor of Government and Public Policy in the School of Politics, Philosophy and Public Affairs at Washington State University. He serves as co-director of the Wesleyan Media Project.

Michael M. Franz

Michael M. Franz is Associate Professor of Government and Legal Studies at Bowdoin College. He also serves as co-director of the Wesleyan Media Project.

Published Online: 2017-02-22

Published in Print: 2016-12-01

Citation Information: The Forum, Volume 14, Issue 4, Pages 445–469, ISSN (Online) 1540-8884, ISSN (Print) 2194-6183, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/for-2016-0040.

Export Citation

©2016 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston.Get Permission

Citing Articles

Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.

Benjamin R Warner, Freddie J Jennings, Josh C Bramlett, Calvin R Coker, Joel Lansing Reed, and Joshua P Bolton
Mass Communication and Society, 2018
Keena Lipsitz and John G. Geer
Political Research Quarterly, 2017, Volume 70, Number 3, Page 577

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in