Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details

The Forum

A Journal of Applied Research in Contemporary Politics

Ed. by Disalvo, Daniel / Stonecash, Jeffrey

4 Issues per year


IMPACT FACTOR 2015: 0.250
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 0.318

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2015: 0.255
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2015: 0.296
Impact per Publication (IPP) 2015: 0.191

Online
ISSN
1540-8884
See all formats and pricing
Volume 14, Issue 4 (Dec 2016)

Issues

Campaign Finance and Political Polarization: When Purists Prevail

Reviewed by Jennifer Nicoll Victor
  • Associate Professor of Political Science, Schar School of Policy and Government, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA, USA
  • Email:
Published Online: 2017-02-22 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/for-2016-0042

Reviewed publication: La RajaRaymond J.SchaffnerBrian F. Campaign Finance and Political Polarization: When Purists Prevail (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2015).

References

  • Bawn, Kathleen, Martin Cohen, David Karol, Seth Masket, Hans Noel, and John Zaller. 2012. “A Theory of Political Parties: Groups, Policy Demands and Nominations in American Politics.” Perspectives on Politics 10 (3): 571–597.

  • Grossmann, Matt, and David A. Hopkins. 2016. Asymmetric Politics: Ideological Republicans and Group Interest Democrats. 1st ed. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

  • Langbein, Laura I., and Lee Sigelman. 1989. “Show Horses, Work Horses, and Dead Horses.” American Politics Quarterly 17 (1): 80–95.

  • Payne, James L. 1980. “Show Horses & Work Horses in the United States House of Representatives.” Polity 12 (3): 428.

About the article

Published Online: 2017-02-22

Published in Print: 2016-12-01


Citation Information: The Forum, ISSN (Online) 1540-8884, ISSN (Print) 2194-6183, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/for-2016-0042. Export Citation

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in