Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

The Forum

A Journal of Applied Research in Contemporary Politics

Ed. by Disalvo, Daniel / Stonecash, Jeffrey

4 Issues per year


IMPACT FACTOR 2017: 0.536

CiteScore 2017: 0.48

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2017: 0.265
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2017: 0.723

Online
ISSN
1540-8884
See all formats and pricing
More options …
Volume 15, Issue 4

Issues

Party Leaders and Electoral Realignment: Democratic and Republican Southern Strategies, 1948–1968

Boris Heersink
Published Online: 2018-03-05 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/for-2017-0042

Abstract

Political scientists who have studied electoral realignments in the American party system increasingly focus on explaining such changes as the result of major historical developments outside of the control of party leaders. Using both national parties’ approaches to the South in the period 1948–1968, I argue that while party leaders may be unable to cause or prevent a realignment, they do attempt to affect the way in which that process plays out. That is, while the shift of Southern White voters from the Democratic to the Republican Party itself was a largely inevitable process, the timing and context in which it played out was affected by competing strategies from both parties. Specifically, I show that between 1948 and 1964, Democratic leaders hedged their bets between attempting to keep white Southern voters in the party, or expel them in favor of black voters in the Northeast based on their assessments of the party’s electoral position. At the same time, between 1948 and 1968, Republican leaders struggled to balance an appeal to segregationist Southerners and voters in other regions before finding a winning formula in Richard Nixon’s 1968 ‘Southern strategy.’

References

  • Bawn, Kathleen, Marty Cohen, David Karol, Seth Masket, Hans Noel, and John Zaller. 2012. “A Theory of Political Parties: Groups, Policy Demands and Nominations in American Politics.” Perspectives on Politics 10 (3): 571–597.Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Berkman, Michael B. 1993. The State Roots of National Politics: Congress and the Tax Agenda, 1978–1986. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar

  • Burnham, Walter Dean. 1970. Critical Elections and the Mainsprings of American Politics. New York: W.W. Norton.Google Scholar

  • Burns, James MacGregor. 1956. Roosevelt: The Lion and the Fox. New York, NY: Harcourt Brace.Google Scholar

  • Caro, Robert A. 2012. The Years of Lyndon Johnson: The Passage of Power. New York, NY: Alfred A. Knopf.Google Scholar

  • Carmines, Edward G., and James A. Stimson. 1989. Issue Evolution: Race and the Transformation of American Politics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

  • Christensen, Rob. 2010. The Paradox of Tar Heel Politics. The Personalities, Elections, and Events That Shaped Modern North Carolina, 2nd edition. Chapel Hill: The University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar

  • Cohen, Marty, David Karol, Hans Noel, and John Zaller. 2008. The Party Decides: Presidential Nominations Before and After Reform. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

  • De Santis, Vincent. 1959. Republicans Face the Southern Question: The New Departure Years, 1877–1897. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins Press.Google Scholar

  • Donovan, Robert J. 1977. The Presidency of Harry S. Truman: Conflict and Crisis, 1945–1948. New York, NY: Norton.Google Scholar

  • Dunn, Susan. 2010. Roosevelt’s Purge: How FDR Fought to Change the Democratic Party. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

  • Farber, David R. 2013. Everybody Ought to Be Rich: The Life and Times of John J. Raskob, Capitalist. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

  • Frymer, Paul. 1999. Uneasy Alliances: Race and Party Competition in America. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

  • Galvin, Daniel J. 2010. Presidential Party Building: Dwight D. Eisenhower to George W. Bush. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

  • Heersink, Boris. 2017. National Party Organizations and Party Brands in American Politics. Dissertation. University of Virginia.Google Scholar

  • Heersink, Boris. Forthcoming. “Party Brands and the Democratic and Republican National Committees, 1952–1976.” Studies in American Political Development.Google Scholar

  • Heersink, Boris, and Jeffery A. Jenkins. 2015. “Southern Delegates and Republican National Convention Politics, 1880–1928.” Studies in American Political Development 29 (1): 68–88.Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Heersink, Boris, and Jeffery A. Jenkins. 2016. “Exploring the Rise of the Republican Party in the South: The Emergence of Operation Dixie, 1948–1968.” Paper presented at the 2016 Annual Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago, IL.Google Scholar

  • Heersink, Boris, and Brenton D. Peterson. 2016. “Measuring the Vice-Presidential Home State Advantage with Synthetic Controls.” American Politics Research 44 (4): 734–763.Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Karol, David. 2009. Party Position Change in American Politics: Coalition Management. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Key, V. O., Jr. 1955. “A Theory of Critical Elections.” Journal of Politics 17: 3–18.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Klinkner, Philip A. 1994. The Losing Parties: Out-Party National Committees, 1956–1993. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

  • Ladd, Everett Carl. 1990. “Like Waiting for Godot: The Uselessness of ‘Realignment’ for Understanding Change in American Politics.” Polity 22 (spring): 311–325.Google Scholar

  • Lowndes, Joseph E. 2008. From the New Deal to the New Right: Race and the Southern Origins of Modern Conservatism. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

  • Mason, Robert. 2012. The Republican Party and American Politics from Hoover to Reagan. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Mayhew, David R. Electoral Realignments: A Critique of an American Genre. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

  • McCullough, David. 1992. Truman. Norwalk, CT: Easton Press.Google Scholar

  • Milkis, Sidney M. 1993. The President and the Parties: The Transformation of the American Party System Since the New Deal. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

  • Newton, Jim. 2011. Eisenhower: The White House Years. New York, NY: Anchor Books.Google Scholar

  • Phillips, Kevin P. 1969. The Emerging Republican Majority. New Rochelle, NY: Arlington House.Google Scholar

  • Rohde, David W. 1991. Parties and Leaders in the Postreform House. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

  • Sanbonmatsu, Kira. 2002. Democrats, Republicans and the Politics of Women’s Place. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar

  • Savage, Sean J. 2004. JFK, LBJ, and the Democratic Party. Albany, NY: University of New York Press.Google Scholar

  • Schickler, Eric. 2016. Racial Realignment: The Transformation of American Liberalism, 1932–1965. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

  • Shoch, James. 2001. Trading Blows: Party Competition and U.S. Trade Policy in a Globalizing Era. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar

  • Silbey, Joel H. 191. “Beyond Realignment and Realignment Theory: American Critical Eras 1789–1989.” In The End of Realignment?, ed. Byron Shafer. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar

  • Sinclair, Barbara. 1989. The Transformation of the U.S. Senate. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins Press.Google Scholar

  • Sundquist, James L. 1983. Dynamics of the Party System: Alignment and Realignment of Political Parties in the U.S. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.Google Scholar

  • Thurber, Timothy. 2013. Republicans and Race: The GOP’s Frayed Relationship with African Americans, 1945–1974. Lawrence, KS: University Press of Kansas.Google Scholar

  • Wolbrecht, Christina. 2000. The Politics of Women’s Rights: Parties, Positions, and Change. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

  • Woodward, C. Vann. 1966. Reunion and Reaction: The Compromise of 1877 and the End of Reconstruction. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

About the article

Published Online: 2018-03-05


Citation Information: The Forum, Volume 15, Issue 4, Pages 631–653, ISSN (Online) 1540-8884, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/for-2017-0042.

Export Citation

©2017 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston.Get Permission

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in