Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

The Forum

A Journal of Applied Research in Contemporary Politics

Ed. by Disalvo, Daniel / Stonecash, Jeffrey

4 Issues per year


IMPACT FACTOR 2017: 0.536

CiteScore 2017: 0.48

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2017: 0.265
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2017: 0.723

Online
ISSN
1540-8884
See all formats and pricing
More options …
Volume 16, Issue 2

Issues

Invisible Coattails: Presidential Approval and Gubernatorial Elections, 1994–2014

Elliott Fullmer / Rebecca Daniel
Published Online: 2018-08-30 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/for-2018-0013

Abstract

Hoping to insulate their contests from national politics, thirty-six states hold their gubernatorial elections in national midterm election years. Many scholars have assessed whether presidential evaluations nevertheless have an effect on these races, though findings have varied. We offer a new approach to examining this question, relying on underutilized state-level presidential approval data preceding 143 gubernatorial races across six national midterm election cycles. Accounting for the effects of state ideology, gubernatorial approval, campaign spending, state economic performance, and incumbency, we report that presidential approval has a positive and significant effect on the performance of the presidential party in gubernatorial races. The substantive effects are modest, though still potentially meaningful. In the primary specification, an additional six points of presidential approval is associated with about one additional point of gubernatorial vote share.

References

  • Abramowitz, Alan, and Steven Webster. 2015. “All Politics is National: The Rise of Negative Partisanship and the Nationalization of U.S. House and Senate Elections in the 21st Century.” Prepared for presentation at the Annual Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago, Illinois, April 16–19, 2015.Google Scholar

  • Alesina, Alberto, and Howard Rosenthal. 1995. Partisan Politics, Divided Government and the Economy. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Atkeson, Lonna Rae, and Randall W. Partin. 1995. “Economic and Referendum Voting: A Comparison of Gubernatorial and Senatorial Elections.” The American Political Science Review 89 (1): 99–107.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bafumi, Joseph, and Robert Y. Shapiro. 2009. “A New Partisan Voter.” The Journal of Politics 71 (1): 1–24.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bailey, Michael, and Elliott Fullmer. 2011. “Balancing in the U.S. States, 1978–2009.” State Politics and Policy Quarterly 11 (2): 148–166.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Berry, William D., Evan J. Ringquist, Richard C. Fording, and Russell L. Hanson. 1998. “Measuring Citizen and Government Ideology in the American States.” American Journal of Political Science 42: 327–348.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Berry, William D., Evan J. Ringquist, Richard C. Fording, and Russell L. Hanson. 2007. “The Measurement and Stability of State Citizen Ideology.” State Politics and Policy Quarterly 7: 111–132.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Beyle, Thad, and Lynn Muchmore, eds. 1983. Being Governor: The View from the Office. Durham, NC: Duke Press Policy Studies.Google Scholar

  • Beyle, Thad L., and Jennifer Jensen. 2015. “Gubernatorial Campaign Expenditures Database.” Available at http://www.unc.edu/∼beyle/guber.html (August 10, 2016).

  • Beyle, Thad, Richard Niemi, and Lee Sigelman. 2002. “Gubernatorial, Senatorial, and State-level Presidential Job Approval: The U.S. Officials Job Approval Ratings (JAR) Collection.” State Politics and Policy Quarterly 2 (3): 215–229.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Beyle, Thad, Richard Niemi, and Lee Sigelman. 2006. “Job Approval Ratings.” The University of Rochester, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, & George Washington University. Available at http://www.unc.edu/%7Ebeyle/jars.html.

  • Campbell, Angus. 1966. “Surge and Decline: A Study of Electoral Change.” In Elections and the Political Order, edited by Angus Campbell, Philip E. Converse, Warren E. Miller and Donald E. Stokes, 40–62. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar

  • Campbell, James E. 1985. “Explaining Presidential Losses in Midterm Congressional Elections.” Journal of Politics 47: 1140–1157.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Campbell, James E. 1991. “The Presidential Surge and its Midterm Decline in Congressional Elections.” Journal of Politics 53: 477–487.Google Scholar

  • Carsey, Thomas M., and Gerald C. Wright. 1998. “State and National Factors in Gubernatorial and Senatorial Elections.” American Journal of Political Science 42 (3): 1008–1011.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Castleton Polling Institute. 2014. “WCAX News 2014 Election Poll.” Available at http://www.castleton.edu/about-castleton/the-castleton-polling-institute/poll-results/vermont-election-poll-2014/ (February 12, 2017).

  • Cohen, Jeffrey E. 2007. “The Polls: Presidential Referendum Effects in the 2006 Midterm Elections.” Presidential Studies Quarterly 37 (3): 545–557.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Engstrom, Erik J., and Samuel Kernell. 2014. Party Ballots, Reform, and the Transformation of America’s Electoral System. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Enten, Harry. 2014. “Despite A Strange Poll, Scott Walker’s Still the Favorite to Win in Wisconsin.” FiveThirtyEight. Available at https://fivethirtyeight.com/datalab/poll-wisconsin-scott-walker-re-election/.

  • Erikson, Robert S. 1988. “The Puzzle of Midterm Loss.” Journal of Politics 50 (4): 1011–1029.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Erikson, Robert S. 2002. “Explaining National Party Tides in Senate Elections: Macropartisanship, Policy Mood, and Ideological Balancing.” In U.S. Senate Exceptionalism, edited by Bruce I. Oppenheimer. Columbus, OH: Ohio State University.Google Scholar

  • Fiorina, Morris P., Samuel J. Abrams, and Jeremy C. Pope. 2010. Culture War? The Myth of a Polarized America. 3rd ed. Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar

  • Green, Donald P., and Jonathan S. Krasno. 1990. “Rebuttal to Jacobson’s ‘New Evidence for Old Arguments.’” American Journal of Political Science 34 (2): 363–372.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Greenberg, Stanley B. 2004. The Two Americas: Our Current Political Deadlock and How to Break It. New York: St. Martin’s Press.Google Scholar

  • Grunge. 2014. “Oregon Governor: Kitzhaber 48%, Richardson 38%.” Grunge. Available at https://presidentialpolls.com/carriere/oregon-governor-kitzhaber-48-richardson-38/.

  • Hinckley, Barbara. 1967. “Interpreting House Midterm Elections: Toward a Measurement of the In-Party’s ‘Expected’ Loss of Seats.” American Political Science Review 61: 694–700.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hopkins, Dan. 2014. “All Politics Is Presidential.” FiveThirtyEight. Available at http://fivethirtyeight.com/features/all-politics-is-presidential/.

  • Jackson, Robert A. 1993. “Voter Mobilization in the 1986 Midterm Election.” Journal of Politics 55: 1081–1099.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Jacobson, Gary. 1980. Money in Congressional Elections. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

  • Jacobson, Gary. 1990. “The Effects of Campaign Spending in House Elections: New Evidence for Old Arguments.” American Journal of Political Science 34 (2): 334–362.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Jacobson, C. Gary. 2003. “Terror, Terrain, and Turnout: Explaining the 2002 Midterm Elections.” Political Science Quarterly 118: 1–22.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Jacobson, Gary C. 2005. “Polarized Politics and the 2004 Congressional and Presidential Elections.” Political Science Quarterly 120 (2): 199–218.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Jacobson, Gary. 2013. “Partisan Polarization in American Politics: A Background Paper.” Presidential Studies Quarterly 43: 688–708.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Leip, Dave. 1994–2014. Dave Leip’s Atlas of U.S. Presidential Elections. Available at http://www.uselectionatlas.org (June 3, 2016).

  • Levonson, Michael. 2014. “Patrick’s legacy shows dents.” Boston Globe. Available at https://www.bostonglobe.com/metro/2014/10/16/patrick-legacy-shows-dents-coakley-baker-tied/ZwgBK3ej2l4sicp6Q2LjKN/story.html.

  • Marquette University Law School. 2014. “Marquette Law School Poll.” Available at https://law.marquette.edu/poll/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/MLSP27ToplinesLV.pdf.

  • Mebane, Walter. 2000. “Coordination, Moderation, and Institutional Balancing in American Presidential and House Elections.” American Political Science Review 94 (March): 37–57.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Mebane, Walter, and Jasjeet S. Sekhon. 2002. “Coordination and Policy Moderation at Midterm.” American Political Science Review 96 (March): 141–157.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Morehouse, Sarah McCally. 1981. State Politics, Parties, and Policy. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar

  • Morris, Joseph M. 2014. “Race for Governor of Pennsylvania and the Use of Force Against ISIS.” The Mercyhurst Center for Applied Politics at Mercyhurst University (February 12, 2017).Google Scholar

  • National Institute on Money in State Politics. 1994–2014. “State Overviews.” Available at http://www.followthemoney.org/ (June 30, 2016).

  • Partin, Randall W. 2002. “Assessing the Impact of Campaign Spending in Governor’s Races.” Political Research Quarterly 30: 213–233.Google Scholar

  • Patterson, Samuel C. 1982. “Campaign Spending in Contests for Governor.” Western Political Quarterly 35: 457–477.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Patterson, Samuel C., and Gregory A. Caldeira. 1983. “Getting Out the Vote: Participation in Gubernatorial Elections.” American Political Science Review 77: 675–689.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Piereson, James E. 1975. “Presidential Popularity and Midterm Voting at Different Electoral Levels.” American Journal of Political Science 19: 683–694.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Public Policy Polling. 2014. “2014 Archive.” Available at http://www.publicpolicypolling.com/main/2014-archive.html (June 18, 2016).

  • Robertson, Nigel. 2014. “WYFF4 Conducts Palmetto Politics Poll.” WYFF. Available at http://www.wyff4.com/article/wyff4-conducts-palmetto-politics-poll/7009928.

  • Sabato, Larry. 1983. Goodbye to Good-time Charlie: The American Governorship Transformed. 2nd ed. Washington: Congressional Quarterly Press.Google Scholar

  • Siena Research Institute. 2016. “Governor Approval Ratings Trends.” Siena College. Available at https://www.siena.edu/centers-institutes/siena-research-institute/political-polls/governors-approval-ratings-trends/ (February 12, 2017).

  • Simon, Dennis M. 1989. “Presidents, Governors, and Electoral Accountability.” Journal of Politics 51: 286–304.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Simon, M. Dennis, Charles W. Ostrom Jr., and Robin F. Marra. 1991. “The President, Referendum Voting, and Subnational Elections in the United States.” The American Political Science Review 85 (4): 1177–1192.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Star Advertiser. 2014. “Hawai’i Poll.” Star-Advertiser/Hawaii News Now. Available at http://hine.ws/specials/news/hipoll_jul2014_gov.pdf.

  • “50 State Tracking Polls.” 2006. Survey USA. Available at http://www.surveyusa.com/50StateTracking.html (June 8, 2016).

  • SurveyUSA. 2006. “Polls.” Available at http://www.surveyusa.com/PollHistory.aspx?d=2006 (June 18, 2016).

  • Tompkins, Mark E. 1988. “Have Gubernatorial Elections Become More Distinctive Contests?” The Journal of Politics 50 (1): 192–205.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Topaz, Jonathan. 2014. “Calif. Poll: Obama Sinks to Record Low.” Politico. Available at http://www.politico.com/story/2014/09/poll-obama-california-approval-rating-110507.

  • Tufte, Edward R. 1975. “Determinants of the Outcomes of Midterm Congressional Election.” American Political Science Review 69: 812–826.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • U.S. Department of Labor. 2016. “Bureau of Labor Statistics.” Available at http://bls.gov/ (June 18, 2016).

  • Vanderbilt University. 2014. “Vanderbilt University Fall 2014 Poll.” Available at http://www.vanderbilt.edu/csdi/November2014VUPollQuestionnaire.pdf (February 12, 2017).

  • YouGov. 2014. “Battleground Tracker 2014: National Attitudes.” YouGov. Available at https://today.yougov.com/news/2014/09/07/battleground-tracker-2014-national-attitudes/#/Wave3StatebyState.

  • Yuan, Y. C. 2000. “Multiple Imputation for Missing Data: Concepts and New Development.” In Proceedings of the Twenty-Fifth Annual SAS Users Group International Conference (Paper No. 267). Cary, NC: SAS Institute.Google Scholar

About the article

Elliott Fullmer

Dr. Elliott Fullmer is an Assistant Professor of Political Science at Randolph-Macon College. His research focuses on elections and voting behavior in the US.

Rebecca Daniel

Mrs. Rebecca Daniel graduated with a political science degree from Randolph-Macon College in 2016. She is now pursuing a career in political advocacy.


Corresponding authors: Dr. Elliott Fullmer and Mrs. Rebecca Daniel, Randolph-Macon College, 114 College Ave., Ashland, VA 23005, USA


Published Online: 2018-08-30


Citation Information: The Forum, Volume 16, Issue 2, Pages 269–287, ISSN (Online) 1540-8884, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/for-2018-0013.

Export Citation

©2018 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston.Get Permission

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in