Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details

Folia Veterinaria

4 Issues per year

Open Access
Online
ISSN
2453-7837
See all formats and pricing

Interobserver Variation in Canine Hip Dysplasia Evaluation

V. Ledecky
  • Small animal clinic, Institute of Surgery, Orthopaedics, Radiology and Reproduction University of Veterinary Medicine and Pharmacy, Komenskeho 73, 041 81 Kosice The Slovak Republic
/ M. Hluchy
  • Small animal clinic, Institute of Surgery, Orthopaedics, Radiology and Reproduction University of Veterinary Medicine and Pharmacy, Komenskeho 73, 041 81 Kosice The Slovak Republic
/ T. Liptak
  • Small animal clinic, Institute of Surgery, Orthopaedics, Radiology and Reproduction University of Veterinary Medicine and Pharmacy, Komenskeho 73, 041 81 Kosice The Slovak Republic
/ M. Kuricova
  • Corresponding author
  • Small animal clinic, Institute of Surgery, Orthopaedics, Radiology and Reproduction University of Veterinary Medicine and Pharmacy, Komenskeho 73, 041 81 Kosice The Slovak Republic
  • Email:
Published Online: 2016-07-06 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/fv-2016-0015

Abstract

Canine hip dysplasia (CHD) is a common disease representing an important problem for many dog breeds worldwide. The screening for CHD and breeding programs have been ongoing for many decades but the incidence of disease have failed to be reduced to the expected level. The early diagnosis of CHD is paramount in order to facilitate the early management strategies and to prevent the breeding of the affected individuals. Generally in this area, the emphasis is placed on the radiographic evaluation process, however this is partly a subjective process suggested to be influenced by the experience of the observers. This study was designed to evaluate the interobserver agreement in CHD evaluation based on the Federation Cynologique International system (FCI system). Ten original radiographs were sent to five different groups of observers, from students to certified veterinarians. They were asked to evaluate the ventro-dorsal radiographs according to the FCI system which is the most common system used in Europe to give the final grades (A, B, C, D, E). The grades were converted to numbers and the data were analysed using a one-way ANOVA test. The results showed that only in 20% of the cases, the interobserver agreement was statistically higher in the group of the most experienced observers when compared to the less experienced group of observers. This means that the level of experience does not always lead to a higher agreement. This could be a problem of widespread objective evaluations of CHD. In addition, there are several different systems of evaluation used in various countries. It is necessary to understand the intention of dog owners, who when buying a dog may be planning its first breeding. Therefore, the “correct” or “incorrect” assessment of the CHD radiographs may not always result in the elimination of affected individuals. We do not know exactly the situation of the development of the hip in some breeds, because scrutineers are receiving only “negative radiographs” for evaluation. Many owners are very educated about hip and elbow dysplasia. It is a time to tell the scientific truth.

Keywords: canine hip dysplasia; dog; FCI; interobserver; screening

References

  • 1. Brass, W., 1989: Hip-dysplasia in dogs. J. Small Anim. Pract., 30, 166-170.

  • 2. Coopman, F., Verhoeven, G., Saunders, J., Duchateau, L., Van Bree, H., 2008: Prevalence of hip dysplasia, elbow dysplasia and humeral head osteochondrosis in dog breeds in Belgium. Vet. Rec., 163, 654-658. [Web of Science]

  • 3. Flückiger, M., Lang, J., Binder, H., Busato, A., Boos J., 1995: The control of hip dysplasia in Switzerland. A retrospect of the past 24 years. Schweiz. Arch. Tierheilkd., 137, 243-250.

  • 4. Flückiger, M., 2007: Scoring radiographs for Canine Hip Dysplasia - The big tree organisations in the world. Europ. J. Comp. Anim. Pract., 17, 135-140.

  • 5. Fortrie, R., Verhoeven, G., Broeckx, B., Duchateau, L., Janssens, L., Samoy, Y., et al., 2015: Intra- and interobserver agreement on radiographic phenotype in the d iagnosis of Canine Hip Dysplasia. Vet. Surg., 44, 467-473. [Web of Science]

  • 6. Swenson, L., Audell, L., Hedhammar, A., 1997: Prevalence and inheritance of and selection for hip dysplasia in seven breeds of dogs in Sweden and benefit: cost analysis of a screening and control program. JAVMA, 210, 207-214.

  • 7. Janutta, V., Hamman, H., Distl, O., 2006: Complex segregation analysis of canine hip dysplasia in German shepherd dogs. J. Hered., 97, 13-20.

  • 8. Keller, G., 2003: The Use of Health Databases and Selective Breeding: A Guide for Dog and Cat Breeders and Owners. 4th edn., Orthopaedic Foundation of Animals Inc., Columbia, MO, USA, 80 pp.

  • 9. Morgan, J. P., Wind, A., Davidson, A. T., 2000: Hip dysplasia. In Hereditary Bone and Joint Diseases in the Dogs. Schlutersche, Hannover, Germany. 131-171.

  • 10. Paster, E. R., Lafond, E., Biery, D. N., Iriye, A., Gregor, T. P., Shofer, F. S., Smith, G. K., 2005: Estimates of prevalence of hip dysplasia in Golden Retrievers and Rottweilers and the influence of bias on published prevalence figures. J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc., 226, 387-392.

  • 11. Powers, M. Y., Biery, D. N., Lawler, D. F., Evans, R. H., Shofer, F., Mayhew, P., et al., 2004: Use of the caudolateral curvilinear osteophytes as an early marker for future development of osteoarthritis associated with hip dysplasia in dogs. J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc., 225, 233-237.

  • 12. Saunders, J. H., Godefroid, T., Snaps, F. R., Francois, A., Farnir, F., Balligand, M., 1999: Comparison of ventrodorsal and dorsoventral radiographic projections for hip dysplasia diagnosis. Vet. Rec., 145, 109-110.

  • 13. Schnelle, G. B., 1935: Congenital subluxation of the coxofemoral joint in a dog. Univ. Pennsylv. Bulletin, 15.

  • 14. Smith, G. K., Biery, D. N., Rhodes, W. H., 1996: Between- and within-radiologist accuracy of subjective hip scoring of the ventrodorsal hipextended radiograph (Abstract). In Proc. Int. Symp. Hip Dysplasia and Osteoarthritis in Dogs. Cornell University, New York, USA, 20.

  • 15. Verhoeven, G., Coopman, F., Duchateau, L., Saunders, J. H., Van Russen, B., Van Bree, H., 2007: Interobserver agreement in the diagnosis of canine hip dysplasia using the standard ventrodorsal hip-extended radiographic method. JSAP, 48, 387-393. [Web of Science]

  • 16. Verhoeven, G., Fortrie, R., Van Ryssen, B., Coopman, F., 2012: Worldwide Screening for Canine Hip Dysplasia: Where Are We Now ? Vet. Surg., 41, 10-19. [Web of Science]

  • 17. Willis, M. B., 1997: A review of the progress in canine hip dysplasia in Britain. J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc., 210, 1480-1482.

About the article

Received: 2016-03-21

Published Online: 2016-07-06

Published in Print: 2016-06-01


Citation Information: Folia Veterinaria, ISSN (Online) 2453-7837, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/fv-2016-0015. Export Citation

© 2016. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License. (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in