Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Yearbook of the German Cognitive Linguistics Association

Editor-in-Chief: Stefanowitsch, Anatol / Schoenefeld, Doris

1 Issue per year

See all formats and pricing
More options …

Figurative processes in meaning interpretation: A case study of novel English compounds

Alexander Onysko
Published Online: 2014-12-16 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/gcla-2014-0006


This article contributes to cognitive semantic research on the construal of figurative meaning in noun-noun compounds. Previous studies in this field have shown a predilection towards using conceptual blending theory in order to describe the process of meaning formation in nominal compounds. Observations have largely been based on analyses of established compounds and their conventionalized meanings. The current paper explores an alternative approach and methodology. A study was conducted in which participants were asked to interpret the meaning of a set of novel noun-noun compounds. These meaning descriptions are taken as an empirical base to investigate figurative interpretations. Since previous applications of conceptual blending theory have highlighted some limitations of describing meaning construal in compounds, and since the relation between conceptual blending and related processes of conceptual metaphor and metonymy has not been clarified yet, the analysis in the current study takes a step back and relies on conceptual metaphor and metonymy. Besides providing an overview of the amount of figurative meaning interpretations given to the different test items, the paper pays particular attention to the methodological challenges of applying conceptual metaphor and metonymy theory in the attempt to capture the figurative nature of the meaning descriptions. A close analysis of selected meaning interpretations provides a first impression on how applying conceptual metaphor and metonymy can pave the way towards a more differentiated understanding of associative complexity in figurative meaning interpretations.

Keywords : compounding; conceptual metaphor; conceptual metonymy; figurative meaning; conceptual blending

About the article

Published Online: 2014-12-16

Published in Print: 2014-11-01

Citation Information: Yearbook of the German Cognitive Linguistics Association, Volume 2, Issue 1, Pages 69–88, ISSN (Online) 2197-2796, ISSN (Print) 2197-2788, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/gcla-2014-0006.

Export Citation

© 2014 by Walter de Gruyter Berlin/Boston. Copyright Clearance Center

Citing Articles

Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.

Alexander Onysko
International Journal of Bilingualism, 2016, Volume 20, Number 3, Page 315
Alexander Onysko
Cognitive Linguistic Studies, 2017, Volume 4, Number 1

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in