Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Global Economy Journal

The Official Publication of the International Trade and Finance Association

Ed. by Pelzman, Joseph

CiteScore 2017: 0.36

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2017: 0.217
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2017: 0.392

More options …
Volume 13, Issue 2


Shedding Light on the Recent U.S.–China Solar Dispute

Don P. Clark
  • Corresponding author
  • Department of Economics, Stokely Management Center, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37996-0550, USA
  • Email
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
Published Online: 2013-06-25 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/gej-2013-0006


This paper reviews the highly politicized recent decision by the U.S. to impose large dumping and countervailing duties on solar cells and modules imported from China. Attention is devoted to discussing the case, the conflict between the Obama administration’s trade policy and environmental goals, shortcomings inherent in the investigations related to solar imports, China’s response to the allegations, the impact on downstream firms that install solar panels, and the future of U.S.–China trade relations. U.S. trade policy is sending a negative signal to the rest of the world that will only encourage retaliation and obstruct the solar sector’s development. Punitive duties are inconsistent with President Obama’s energy and export initiatives. The U.S. should refrain from transforming trade policy mistakes into energy/environmental and export policy failures.

Keywords: dumping duties; countervailing duties; trade dispute


  • Boltuck, Richard, and Robert E. Litan. (eds). 1991. Down in the Dumps: Administration of Unfair Trade Laws. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.Google Scholar

  • Feinberg, Robert M. 2011. “Antidumping as a Development Issue.” Global Economy Journal 11 (3):Article 2.Google Scholar

  • Hufbauer, Gary Clyde, and Martin Vieiro. 2012. “U.S. Anti-Dumping Duties on Chinese Solar Cells: A Costly Step.” Accessed May 25, 2012. http://www.piie.com/blogs/realtime/?p=2900.

  • Ikenson, Daniel J. 2010. Protection Made to Order: Domestic Industry’s Capture and Reconfiguration of U.S. Antidumping Policy. Cato Institute, Center for Trade Policy Studies. No. 44, December 21, 2010:1–22.Google Scholar

  • Ikenson, Daniel J. 2011. “Solar Panel Case Sheds Light in the Imperative of U.S. Trade Law Reform.” Accessed December 22, 2011. http://cato.org/blog/solar-panel-case-shines-light-imperative-us-trade-law-reform.

  • International Trade Administration. 2011. Commerce Initiates Antidumping Duty (AD) and Countervailing Duty (CVD) Investigations of Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic Cells, Whether or Not Assembled into Modules (Solar Cells) from the People’s Republic of China (China). http://ia.ita.doc.gov/download/factsheets/ factsheet_prc-solar-cells-ad-cvd-finals-20121010.pdf.

  • Lincicome, Scott. 2012. Countervailing Calamity: How to Stop the Global Subsidies Race. Cato Institute, Policy Analysis No. 710, October 9, 2012:1–35.Google Scholar

  • Sweet, Cassandra. 2012. “Solar Flare-Up: Back Tax Roils U.S. Firms.” Wall Street Journal. August 24, 2012.Google Scholar

  • The White House. 2011. Blueprint for a Secure Energy Future. Accessed March 30, 2011. http://whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/blueprint_secure_energy_future.

  • U.S. International Trade Commission. 2011. Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic Cells and Modules from China: Investigations Nos. 701-TA-481 and 731-TA-1190 (Preliminary). Publication 4295. Washington, DC: USITC, December 2011.Google Scholar

  • U.S. International Trade Commission. 2012. Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic Cells and Modules from China.: Investigations Nos. 701-TA-481 and 731-TA-1190 (Final). Publication 4360. Washington, DC: USITC, November 2012.Google Scholar

  • Velker, Randy. 2012. “Tariffs on Chinese Panels Would Cloud Solar’s Future.” Knoxville News Sentinel, March 4, 2012, p. 4F.Google Scholar

About the article

Published Online: 2013-06-25

Citation Information: Global Economy Journal, Volume 13, Issue 2, Pages 251–259, ISSN (Online) 1524-5861, ISSN (Print) 2194-5659, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/gej-2013-0006.

Export Citation

©2013 by Walter de Gruyter Berlin / Boston.Get Permission

Citing Articles

Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.

Ans Kolk and Louise Curran
Journal of Business Ethics, 2017, Volume 142, Number 4, Page 697

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in