Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Global Economy Journal

The Official Publication of the International Trade and Finance Association

Ed. by Pelzman, Joseph

4 Issues per year


CiteScore 2017: 0.36

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2017: 0.217
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2017: 0.392

Online
ISSN
1553-5304
See all formats and pricing
More options …
Volume 18, Issue 1

Issues

Technical Barriers to Trade: A Canadian Perspective on Ecolabelling

Farnaz Farnia
  • Corresponding author
  • Department of Industrial Engineering and Mathematics, Polytechnique Montréal, Montreal, Canada
  • Center for Interuniversity Research and Analysis of Organizations (CIRANO), Montreal, Canada
  • Email
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
/ Nathalie De Marcellis-Warin
  • Department of Industrial Engineering and Mathematics, Polytechnique Montréal, Montreal, Canada
  • Center for Interuniversity Research and Analysis of Organizations (CIRANO), Montreal, Canada
  • Harvard T. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA 02115, USA
  • Email
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
/ Thierry Warin
  • Center for Interuniversity Research and Analysis of Organizations (CIRANO), Montreal, Canada
  • Department of International Business, HEC Montréal, Montreal, Canada
  • Harvard Business School, Boston, MA 02163, USA
  • Email
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
Published Online: 2018-05-05 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/gej-2017-0090

Abstract

Ecolabelling is a market-based instrument and an important element of international environmental policies. In our day and age, there is a wide range of ecolabels, which may complicate the decision-making process when looking for the best outcome for consumers and producers. The International Organization for Standardization (ISO) and Global Ecolabelling Network (GEN) suggest a solution to align the various ecolabelling programs. For instance, ISO launched the ISO 14,001 framework, which includes the requirements for Environmental Management Systems (EMSs). The GEN harmonizes international ecolabelling schemes and improves exchanges of information among its country members. This article addresses how unaligned and aligned regulations impact international trade. Consequently, a database including the ISO 14,001 certifications of all countries and containing the exports from 153 countries to Canada from 2001 to 2015 as a dependent variable was created. The remaining variables will serve as independent variables, including gravity variables such as market size, market similarity, distance, and some other core variables such as GEN membership of the exporting country, WTO membership, binding in Free Trade Agreements (FTA) and Mutual Recognition Agreements (MRA) with Canada. Findings show that holding ISO 14,001 certifications has a positive impact on exports to Canada; however, these impacts are not significant enough. Therefore, there is not strong evidence that ISO 14,001 creates barriers to export to Canada. In addition, GEN membership significantly promotes exports to Canada, especially for countries binding in an FTA or MRA with Canada.

Keywords: technical barriers to trade; ecolabelling; exports; Canada

References

  • Anderson, James E. 1979. “A Theoretical Foundation for the Gravity Equation.” The American Economic Review 69 (1):106–116.Google Scholar

  • Bachmann, Chris. 2017. “Modeling the Impacts of Free Trade Agreements on Domestic Transportation Gateways, Corridors, and Ports.” In Transportation Research Board 96th Annual Meeting. https://trid.trb.org/view.aspx?id=1437432.Google Scholar

  • Bansal, Pratima. 2002. “The Corporate Challenges of Sustainable Development.” The Academy of Management Executive 16 (2):122–131.Google Scholar

  • Bartels, Brandon. 2008. “Beyond ‘Fixed versus Random Effects’: A Framework for Improving Substantive and Statistical Analysis of Panel, Time-Series Cross-Sectional, and Multilevel Data.” The Society for Political Methodology 9: 1–43.Google Scholar

  • Bartenstein, Kristin, and Lavallée Sophie. 2003. “L’écolabel Est-Il Un Outil Du Protectionnisme «Vert»?” Les Cahiers De Droit 44 (3):361–393.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Basu, Arnab K., Nancy H Chau, and Ulrike Grote. 2004. “On Export Rivalry and the Greening of Agriculture–The Role of Eco-Labels.” Agricultural Economics 31 (2–3):135–147.Google Scholar

  • Basu, Arnab K., Nancy H Chau, and Ulrike Grote. 2007. “Eco-Labelling and Strategic Rivalry in Export Markets.” In New Frontiers in Environmental and Social Labelling, 111–132. Physica-Verlag HD. http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/978-3-7908-1756-0_6.pdf.Google Scholar

  • Beck, Nathaniel, and Jonathan N Katz. 1995. “What to Do (And Not to Do) with Time-Series Cross-Section Data.” American Political Science Review 89 (3):634–647.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Beck, Nathaniel, and Jonathan N Katz. 2006. “Random Coefficient Models for Time-Series–Cross-Section Data: Monte Carlo Experiments.” Political Analysis 15 (2):182–195.Google Scholar

  • Carlson, Anna, and Charles Palmer. 2016. “A Qualitative Meta-Synthesis of the Benefits of Eco-Labelling in Developing Countries.” Ecological Economics 127:129–145.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Carey, Jeffrey, and John Holmes. 2017. “What Does the Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement Portend for the Canadian Automotive Industry?” Canadian Public Policy 43 (S1): S30–S42.Google Scholar

  • Castka, Pavel, and Charles J Corbett. 2016. “Governance of Eco-Labels: Expert Opinion and Media Coverage.” Journal of Business Ethics 135 (2):309–326.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Cohen, Mark A., and Michael P Vandenbergh. 2012. “The Potential Role of Carbon Labelling in a Green Economy.” Energy Economics 34:S53–S63.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Dauvergne, Peter, and Jane Lister. 2010. “The Prospects and Limits of Eco-Consumerism: Shopping Our Way to Less Deforestation?” Organization & Environment 23 (2):132–154.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Delmas, Magali A., Nicholas Nairn-Birch, and Michaela Balzarova. 2013. “Choosing the Right Eco-Label for Your Product.” MIT Sloan Management Review 54 (4):10.Google Scholar

  • Du, Ming. 2015. “What Is a Technical Regulation in the TBT Agreement? Some Reflections on EC-Seal Products.” https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2579361Google Scholar

  • Duggan, Deirdre E., and Momo Kochen. 2016. “Small in Scale but Big in Potential: Opportunities and Challenges for Fisheries Certification of Indonesian Small-Scale Tuna Fisheries.” Marine Policy 67 (May):30–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2016.01.008.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Durst, P. B., P. J. McKenzie, C. L. Brown, and S. Appanah. 2006. “Challenges Facing Certification and Eco-Labelling of Forest Products in Developing Countries.” International Forestry Review 8 (2):193–200.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Eisenhart, Churchill. 1947. “The Assumptions Underlying the Analysis of Variance.” Biometrics 3 (1):1–21.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Esty, Daniel C., and Damien Geradin. 1997. “Market Access, Competitiveness, and Harmonization: Environmental Protection in Regional Trade Agreements.” Harv. Envtl. L. Rev. 21:265.Google Scholar

  • Gaviria, Diana. 1995. “Introducing the Ecolabelling Concept: Experience of Colombia.” In International Trade Forum, 8. International Trade Centre. http://search.proquest.com/openview/0b1ab8746e543484cc0ac45ee9ab6fbc/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=47429.Google Scholar

  • Gulbrandsen, Lars H. 2005. “Mark of Sustainability? Challenges for Fishery and Forestry Eco-Labelling.” Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development 47 (5):8–23.Google Scholar

  • Gutiérrez, Nicolás L., Sarah R Valencia, Trevor A Branch, David J Agnew, Julia K Baum, Patricia L Bianchi, Jorge Cornejo-Donoso, et al. 2012. “Eco-Label Conveys Reliable Information on Fish Stock Health to Seafood Consumers.” PLoS One 7 (8):e43765.Google Scholar

  • Hall, C. Michael, Stefan Gossling, Daniel Scott, and others. 2015. The Routledge Handbook of Tourism and Sustainability. Routledge. https://books.google.ca/books?hl=en‎&id=NaygBgAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PP1&dq= hall+2015+tourism+and+sustainability&ots=E6I5e_j6i2&sig=L1trU3HqiMkclGFS1dOKT9s1qJkGoogle Scholar

  • Henson, Spencer. 2011. “Private Agrifood Governance: Conclusions, Observations and Provocations.” Agriculture and Human Values 28 (3):443–451.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hox, Joop J., and Ita GG Kreft. 1994. “Multilevel Analysis Methods.” Sociological Methods & Research 22 (3):283–299.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hsiao, Cheng. 1986. Analysis of Panel Data, Econometric Society Monograph No. 11. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Jiang, Ruihua Joy, and Pratima Bansal. 2003. “Seeing the Need for ISO 14001.” Journal of Management Studies 40 (4):1047–1067.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Jørgensen, Rikke Bramming, and Øystein Moen. 2015. “Eco Labelling from the Consumer Perspective: A Case Study of Indoor Paint Products.” Journal of Research for Consumers, 27:1–25.Google Scholar

  • Juwaheer, Devi, Sharmila Pudaruth Thanika, and Emmanuelle Noyaux Marie Monique. 2012a. “Analysing the Impact of Green Marketing Strategies on Consumer Purchasing Patterns in Mauritius.” World Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Sustainable Development 8 (1):36–59.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Juwaheer, Devi, Sharmila Pudaruth Thanika, and Emmanuelle Noyaux Marie Monique. 2012b. “Analysing the Impact of Green Marketing Strategies on Consumer Purchasing Patterns in Mauritius.” World Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Sustainable Development 8 (1):36–59.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Karacaovali, Baybars, Deveraux Talagi, and others. 2017. “International Trade Effects of Trans Pacific Partnership for North America.” http://www.economics.hawaii.edu/research/workingpapers/WP_17-1.pdf.Google Scholar

  • Kukucha, Christopher J. 2016. Multilateralism and Canadian Foreign Trade Policy, 117. Seeking Order in Anarchy: Multilateralism as State Strategy. Edmonton: University of Alberta Press.Google Scholar

  • Lackey, Robert T. 2005. “Fisheries: History, Science, and Management.” Water Encyclopedia. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/047147844X.sw249/full.Google Scholar

  • Lake, James. 2017. “Free Trade Agreements as Dynamic Farsighted Networks.” Economic Inquiry 55 (1):31–50.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Lee, Soyoung. 2016. “Compatibility of Eco-Labelling Scheme with WTO and Its Potentially Conflicting Impacts.” In Legal Issues on Climate Change and International Trade Law, edited by D.-Y. Park, 43–65. Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-29322-6_2.Google Scholar

  • Lexchin, Joel, and Marc-André Gagnon. 2013. “CETA and Intellectual Property: The Debate over Pharmaceutical Patents.” CETD Policy Briefs Series, Http://Labs.Carleton.Ca/Canadaeurope/Wpcontent/Uploads/Sites/9/CETD-Policy-Brief_CETA-and-Pharmaceutical-patents_MG_JL.Pdf.http://labs.carleton.ca/canadaeurope/wp-content/uploads/sites/9/CETD-Policy-Brief_CETA-and-pharmaceutical-patents_MG_JL.pdf.Google Scholar

  • Lim, Sijeong, and Aseem Prakash. 2014. “Voluntary Regulations and Innovation: The Case of ISO 14001.” Public Administration Review 74 (2):233–244.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • MacRae, Rod. 2014. “Do Trade Agreements Substantially Limit Development of Local/Sustainable Food Systems in Canada?”. Canadian Food Studies/La Revue Canadienne Des Études Sur L’alimentation 1 (1):103–125.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Melser, Daniel, and Peter E Robertson. 2005. “Eco-Labelling and the Trade-Environment Debate.” The World Economy. 28. pp. 49–62.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Parks, Richard W. 1967. “Efficient Estimation of a System of Regression Equations When Disturbances are Both Serially and Contemporaneously Correlated.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 62 (318):500–509.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Pérez-Ramírez, Mónica, and Salvador Lluch-Cota, and others. 2010. “Fisheries Certification in Latin America: Recent Issues and Perspectives.” Interciencia 35 (11):855–861.Google Scholar

  • Prieto-Sandoval, Vanessa, José A Alfaro, Andrés Mejía-Villa, and Marta Ormazabal. 2016. “ECO-Labels as a Multidimensional Research Topic: Trends and Opportunities.” Journal of Cleaner Production 135 (November):806–818. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.06.167.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Raynolds, Laura T. 2000. “Re-Embedding Global Agriculture: The International Organic and Fair Trade Movements.” Agriculture and Human Values 17 (3):297–309.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Reisch, Lucia A. 2001. “Eco-Labelling and Sustainable Consumption in Europe: Lessons to Be Learned from the Introduction of a National Label for Organic Food.” Consumer Interest Annual 47:1–6.Google Scholar

  • RSMeans. 2011. Green Building: Project Planning and Cost Estimating. Kingston, MA: R.S. Means Company, Inc.Google Scholar

  • Ruckert, Arne, Ashley Schram, Ronald Labonté, Sharon Friel, Deborah Gleeson, and Anne-Marie Thow. 2017. “Policy Coherence, Health and the Sustainable Development Goals: A Health Impact Assessment of the Trans-Pacific Partnership.” Critical Public Health 27 (1):86–96.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Rugman, Alan M., and Alain Verbeke. 1998. “Corporate Strategies and Environmental Regulations: An Organizing Framework.” Strategic Management Journal 19 (4): 363–75.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Shen, Junyi. 2012. “Understanding the Determinants of Consumers’ Willingness to Pay for Eco-Labeled Products: An Empirical Analysis of the China Environmental Label.” Journal of Service Science and Management, 5 (March), 87–94. http://file.scirp.org/Html/11-9201422_18237.htm.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Smith, Timothy M., and Miriam Fischlein. 2010. “Rival Private Governance Networks: Competing to Define the Rules of Sustainability Performance.” Global Environmental Change 20 (3):511–522.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Smyth, Stuart J., William A Kerr, and Peter WB Phillips. 2017. “Labelling and Preferential Trade Deals.” Biotechnology Regulation and Trade, 235–250. Springer. http://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-319-53295-0_12.Google Scholar

  • Stock, James H., and Mark W. Watson. 2012. Introduction to Econometrics: Global Edition. Boston, MA: Pearson Education.Google Scholar

  • Swamy, Paravastu AVB. 1970. “Efficient Inference in a Random Coefficient Regression Model.” Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society 38: 311–323.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Teisl, M. F., B. Roe, and R. L. Hicks. 2002. “Can Eco-Labels Tune a Market? Evidence from Dolphin-Safe Labelling.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 43 (3):339–359. https://doi.org/10.1006/jeem.2000.1186.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Thomsen, Jakob, and Tim C McAloone. 2015. “Does the Ecomark Label Promote Environmentally Improved Products in India and What Experiences Can Be Drawn from the Nordic Ecolabel?” ICoRD’15–Research into Design across Boundaries Volume 2, 125–135. New Delhi: Springer. http://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-81-322-2229-3_11.Google Scholar

  • Trebilcock, Michael J., and Robert Howse. 2005. The Regulation of International Trade. London and New York: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.Google Scholar

  • UNEP. 1997. Report of the Governing Council of the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP), Supplement No. 25, April 1997.Google Scholar

  • Ven, Hamish. 2015. “Correlates of Rigorous and Credible Transnational Governance: A Cross-Sectoral Analysis of Best Practice Compliance in Eco-Labelling.” Regulation & Governance 9 (3):276–293.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Vranes, Erich. 2011. “Climate Labelling and the WTO: The 2010 EU Ecolabelling Programme as a Test Case under WTO Law.” In European Yearbook of International Economic Law 2011, 205–237. Berlin: Springer. http://link.springer.com/10.1007%2F978-3-642-14432-5_9.Google Scholar

  • Warin, Thierry. 2015. “Libre-Échange Entre l’Union Européenne et Le Canada: Quelles Sont Les Opportunités À Saisir”. Harvard Business Review (France), September 17.Google Scholar

  • Warin, Thierry, Phanindra V Wunnava, and Hubert P Janicki. 2009. “Testing Mundell’s Intuition of Endogenous OCA Theory.” Review of International Economics 17 (1):74–86.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Wright, J. 2011. “U.S. Defends Its Dolphin Safe Tuna Policy against Criticism of Mexico.” WTO Rulling, SeaFood Business 30 (12).Google Scholar

  • Xu, Pei, Yinchu Zeng, Quentin Fong, Todd Lone, and Yuanyuan Liu. 2012. “Chinese Consumers’ Willingness to Pay for Green-And Eco-Labeled Seafood.” Food Control 28 (1):74–82.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Zhang, Yu, Jinhe Zhang, Chang Wang, Jingjing Cao, Zehua Liu, and Lachun Wang. 2017. “China and Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement Countries: Estimation of the Virtual Water Trade of Agricultural Products.” Journal of Cleaner Production 140:1493–1503.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

About the article

Published Online: 2018-05-05


Citation Information: Global Economy Journal, Volume 18, Issue 1, 20170090, ISSN (Online) 1553-5304, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/gej-2017-0090.

Export Citation

© 2018 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston.Get Permission

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in