Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Gender Studies

The Journal of West University, Timisoara, Interdisciplinary Centre for Gender Studies

1 Issue per year

Open Access
Online
ISSN
2286-0134
See all formats and pricing
More options …

“Contending with the Fretful Element”: Shakespeare and the (Gendered) Great Chain of Being

György E. Szönyi
Published Online: 2013-02-08 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/v10320-012-0025-6

Abstract

E. M. W. Tillyard’s short but seminal book, The Elizabethan World Picture made its appearance as a ground-breaking work in the mid-1940s. It successfully adapted Arthur O. Lovejoy’s discovery of the Great Chain of Being as the central idea and metaphor of the premodern world picture for English Renaissance culture and literature, offering a key to understanding the often unfamiliar and obscure natural philosophy and metaphysics behind its works of art and literature. The concept of the Great Chain also led to Shakespeare being seen as a supporter of a conservative order in which religious, moral, philosophical, and scientific notions corresponded with each other in a strict hierarchy. The poststructuralist turn unleashed a severe attack on Tillyard and his legacy. As Ewan Fernie in a recent book on the Renaissance has diagnosed: “Now, after the theoretical overhaul, the notion of an ultimately authoritarian Renaissance has been thoroughly revised. In place of Tillyard’s full-fledged and secured physical, social and cosmological system, more recent critics tend to posit a conflicted and constantly negotiated culture with no essential pattern”. But what has happened to the idea of the Great Chain of Being, which, without doubt, played a major role in the Renaissance world picture and provided a basic knowledge about the elements? In my paper I am going to revisit some aspects of this world picture and examine how Shakespeare related to this (more often than not) in a subversive way, while still remaining within the boundaries of this organic and proto-modern system. Since the concept of the elements had gender aspects, too, I will also focus on the question of how proto-modern natural philosophy theorised about the dichotomy, antagonism, and the cooperation of male and female principles.

Keywords: gender; Great Chain of Being; premodern natural philosophy; romances; Shakespeare; theology

  • [Andreae, Johann Valentin.] 1690 (original German: 1626). The Hermetick Romance orThe Chymical Wedding Written by Christian Rosencreutz. Translated by E.Foxcroft, late Fellow of Kings College Cambridge. London.Google Scholar

  • Ashmole, E. (ed.). 1652. Theatrum Chemicum Britannicum. Containing SeverallPoeticall Pieces of our famous English Philosophers. London. [Pseudo] Bacon, R. 1597. The Mirror of Alchimy. London.Google Scholar

  • Bright, T. 1586. A Treatise of Melancholie Containing the Causes Thereof, &Reasons of the Strange Effects it Worketh in Our Minds and Bodies. London: Thomas Vautrollier.Google Scholar

  • Calian, G.-F. 2010. “Alkimia Operativa and Alkimia Speculativa. Some Modern Controversies on the Historiography of Alchemy” in K. Szende and J. Rasson (eds.). Annual of Medieval Studies At Ceu 10. Budapest: CEUPress, pp.166-90.Google Scholar

  • Daly, P. 1993. Teaching Shakespeare and the Emblem. A Lecture and Bibliography. Wolfville: Acadia University.Google Scholar

  • Davies, J. 1603. Microcosmos. The Discovery of the Little World, with the Government Thereof. London.Google Scholar

  • Fernie, E. et al. (eds.) 2005. Reconceiving The Renaissance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

  • Ferrand, James [Jacques]. 1640. Erotomania, or a Treatise Discoursing of the Essence,Causes, Symptomes, Prognosticks, and Cure of Love, or Erotique Melancholy. London.Google Scholar

  • Fludd, Robert. 1617. Utriusque cosmi historia (2 vols). Oppenheim: Theodor de Bry.Google Scholar

  • Holderness, G. 1992. Shakespeare Recycled. The Making of Historical Drama. London: Harvester.Google Scholar

  • Idel, M. 1988. Kabbalah. New Perspectives. Yale University Press.Google Scholar

  • Jung, C. G. 1980 (1953). Psychology and Alchemy. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar

  • Klossowski de Rola, S. 1988. The Golden Game: Alchemical Engravings of theSeventeenth Century. London: Thames & Hudson.Google Scholar

  • Lovejoy, A. O. 1936. The Great Chain of Being: A Study of a History of an Idea. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press (several subsequent editions).Google Scholar

  • Maier, M. 1656 (original Latin 1618). Themis aurea. The Laws of the Fraternity of theRosie Crosse. London: N. Brooke.Google Scholar

  • More, H. 1656. Enthusiasmus Triumphatus, Or, A Discourse of the Nature, Causes,Kinds, and Cure, of Enthusiasme. London.Google Scholar

  • Nemesius, tr. and ed. G. Wither. 1636. The Nature of Man. London.Google Scholar

  • Nicholl, C. 1980. The Chemical Theatre. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

  • Paracelsus, A. Ph. Th. 1976 (1894). The Hermetic and Alchemical Writings. 2 vols. Ed. A. E. Waite. Berkeley: Shambala.Google Scholar

  • Peacham, H. 1612. Minerva Britanna [collection of emblems]. London. See also: “The Minerva Britanna Project” [Online]. Available: http://f01.middlebury.edu/FS010A/STUDENTS/index.htm.Google Scholar

  • Recorde, R. 1556. The Castle of Knowledge. London.Google Scholar

  • Ripley, G. 1591 (1471). The Compound of Alchemy. London.Google Scholar

  • Roob, A.1997. The Hermetic Museum: Alchemy and Mysticism. Köln: Taschen.Google Scholar

  • Scholem, G. 1987. Origins of the Kabbalah. Princeton University Press, The Jewish Publication Society.Google Scholar

  • Shakespeare = OpenSource Shakespeare (www.opensourceshakespeare.com) Shakespeare, W. 1974. The Riverside Shakespeare. Ed. G. Blakemore Evans. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar

  • Szönyi, G.E. 2000. “Matching the ‘Falles of Princes’ and ‘Machiavell’: Tradition and Subversion in the Historiography and Iconography of Shakespeare’s Histories” in Szönyi G. E. & R. Wymer (eds.). The Iconography of Power: Ideas andImages of Rulership on the English Renaissance Stage (Szeged: JATEPress, Papers in English & American Studies 8), pp. 5-33.Google Scholar

  • -. 2003. “The ‘Emblematic’ as a Way of Thinking and Seeing in Renaissance Culture” in E-Colloquia 1.1: <http://ecolloquia.btk.ppke.hu/issues/200301/>.Google Scholar

  • Tillyard, E. M. W. 1943. The Elizabethan World Picture. London: Chatto & Windus (and several subsequent editions). --. 1944. Shakespeare’s History Plays. London: Chatto & Windus.Google Scholar

  • Walkington, T. 1607. The Optick Glasse of Humors. Or the Touchstone of a goldentemperature, or the Philosophers Stone to make a golden temper. Wherein thefour complections Sanguine, Cholericke, Phlegmaticke, Melancholicke aresuccintly painted forth... London.Google Scholar

  • Wilson, D. J. 1987. “Lovejoy’s the Great Chain of Being after Fifty Years” in Journal ofthe History of Ideas 48.2: 187-206. For text and concordance I have used the Open Source Shakespeare (www.opensourceshakespeare.com), access 2010-03-21, always doublechecking with The Riverside Shakespeare (Ed. G. Blakemore Evans, Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1974). Google Scholar

About the article

Published Online: 2013-02-08

Published in Print: 2012-12-01


Citation Information: Gender Studies, ISSN (Online) 2286-0134, ISSN (Print) 1583-980X, DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/v10320-012-0025-6.

Export Citation

This content is open access.

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in