Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Open Geosciences

formerly Central European Journal of Geosciences

Editor-in-Chief: Jankowski, Piotr

1 Issue per year


IMPACT FACTOR 2016 (Open Geosciences): 0.475

CiteScore 2016: 0.87

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2016: 0.346
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2016: 0.690

Open Access
Online
ISSN
2391-5447
See all formats and pricing
More options …

Phytolith aided paleoenvironmental studies from the Dutch Neolithic

Gergő Persaits
  • University of Szeged, Department of Geology and Paleontology, H-6722 Szeged, Egyetem u. 2-6, Hungary
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
/ Sándor Gulyás
  • University of Szeged, Department of Geology and Paleontology, H-6722 Szeged, Egyetem u. 2-6, Hungary
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
/ Katalin Náfrádi
  • University of Szeged, Department of Geology and Paleontology, H-6722 Szeged, Egyetem u. 2-6, Hungary
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
/ Pál Sümegi
  • University of Szeged, Department of Geology and Paleontology, H-6722 Szeged, Egyetem u. 2-6, Hungary
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
/ Csaba Szalontai
Published Online: 2015-11-23 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/geo-2015-0049

Abstract

There is increasing evidence for crop cultivation at sites of the Neolithic Swifterbant culture from ca. 4300 B.C. onwards. Presence of cereal fields at the Swifterbant S2, S3 and S4 sites has been corroborated from micro morphological studies of soil samples. Swifterbant sites with evidence for cultivated plants are still scarce though and only emerging, and have produced very low numbers of charred cereals only. The major aim of our work was to elucidate the environmental background of the Dutch Neolithic site Swifterbant S4 based on the investigation of phytolith remains retrieved from soil samples. In addition to find evidence for crop cultivation independently from other studies. Samples were taken at 1 cm intervals vertically from the soil section at the central profile of site S4. Additional samples were taken from pocket-like structures and adjacent horizons above and below. Pig coprolites yielded an astonishing phytolith assemblage which was compared to that of the soil samples. A pig tooth also yielded evaluable material via detailed investigation using SEM. The evaluation of phytolith assemblages retrieved from the soil horizons plus those ending up in the droppings of pigs feasting in the area enabled to draw a relatively reliable environmental picture of the area. All these refer to the presence of a Neolithic horticulture (cereal cultivation) under balanced micro-climatic conditions as a result of the vicinity of the nearby floodplain. These findings corroborate those of previous soil micro-morphological studies.

Keywords: Phytolith; monolith; coprolite; molar; Neolithic; Swifterbant; paleosol

References

  • [1] Whittle A., Europe in the Neolithic. The creation of new worlds. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1996. Google Scholar

  • [2] Louwe Kooijmans L.P., The gradual transition to farming in the Lower Rhine Basin. In: Whittle A, Cummings V (Eds) Going over: the mesolithic–neolithic transition in North-West Europe. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2007, 287–309. Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • [3] Louwe Kooijmans L.P., The agency factor in the process of neolithisation—a Dutch case study, Journal of Archaeology of Low Cities 2009, 1, 27–54. Google Scholar

  • [4] Louwe Kooijmans L.P., Schipluiden and the final stage of neolithisation in the Lower Rhine Basin, RAP Le Néolithique du Nord de la France dans son contexte européen 2011, 28, 1–17. Google Scholar

  • [5] Raemekers D.C., Looking for a place to stay – Swifterbant and Funnel Beaker settlements in the northern Netherlands and Lower Saxony. In: Bittman F., Bungenstock F., Ey J., Jöns H., Strahl E., Wolters S., (Eds.). Settlement and coastal research in the southern North Sea region. Werlag Marie Leidorf GmBh, Rahden, 2013, 111–131. Google Scholar

  • [6] Schepers M., Scheepens J.F., Cappers R.T.J., Van Tongeren O.F.R., Raemaekers D.C.M., Bekker R.M., An objective method based on assemblages of subfossil plant macro-remains to reconstruct past natural vegetation: A case study of Swifterbant, The Netherlands, Vegetation History and Archaeobotany 2012, 22, 243-255. Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • [7] Out W.A., Growing habits? Dealyed introduction of crop cultivation at marginal neolithic wetland sites. Vegetation History and Archaeobotany, 2008, 17, 131–138. Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • [8] Out W.A., Integrated archaeobotanical analysis: Human impact at the Dutch neolithic wetland site the Hazendonk, Journal of Archaeological Science 2010, 37, 1521–1531. CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • [9] Bakels C., Zeiler J., The fruits of the land: neolithic subsistence. In: Out W. (Eds.), Sowing the seed? Human impact and plant subsistence in Dutch wetlands during the Late Mesolithic and Early and Middle Neolithic (5500–3400 cal BC). Leiden University Press, Leiden, 2005, 311–315. Google Scholar

  • [10] Bogaard A., Neolithic Farming in Central Europe. Routledge, London, 2003. Google Scholar

  • [11] Cappers R.T.J., Raemaekers D.C.M., Cereal Cultivation at Swifterbant? Neolithic Wetland Farming on the North European Plain, Current Anthropology 2008, 49, 385–402. Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [12] Huisman D.J., Jongmans A.G., Raemaekers D.C.M., Investigating Neolithic land use inSwifterbant (NL) using micromorphological techniques, Catena 2009, 78, 185–197. Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [13] Sümegi P., A régészeti geológia és a történeti ökológia alapjai. (Introduction to geoarcheology and environmental history), JATEPress, Szeged, 2003 (in Hungarian). Google Scholar

  • [14] Persaits G., A fitolitok szerepe a geoarchaeológiai minták értékelésében. (The improtance of phytoliths in geoarchaeological studies.) Doktori (PhD) értekezés. (Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation). SZTE TTIK Földtani és Őslénytani Tanszék, Szeged, 2010 (in Hungarian). Google Scholar

  • [15] Persaits G., Sümegi P., A fitolitok szerepe a régészeti geológiai és környezettörténeti minták értékelésében. In: Unger, J., Pál- Molnár, E. (Eds.), Geoszférák 2010. GeoLitera, SZTE TTIK Földrajzi és Földtani Tanszékcsoport, Szeged, 2011, 307–354 (in Hungarian). Google Scholar

  • [16] Pető Á., A fitolitkutatás szerepe az őskörnyezettanban és a környezet régészetben, valamint a hazai alkalmazásának lehetőségei, Archeometriai Műhely 2009, 2, 15–30 (in Hungarian). Google Scholar

  • [17] Piperno D.R., Phytoliths. A Comprehensive Guide for Archaeologists and Paleoecologists. Altamira Press, Oxford, 2006. Google Scholar

  • [18] Louwe Kooijmans L.P., The Mesolithic/Neolithic transformation in the Lower Rhine Basin. In: Bogucki P.I. (Eds.), Case studies in European prehistory. CRC Press, Boca Raton, 1980b, 95–145. Google Scholar

  • [19] van der Waals J.D., Waterbolk H.T., Excavations at the natural levee sites S2, S3/5 and S4 (Swifterbant Contribution 6), Helinium 1977, 17, 3–27. Google Scholar

  • [20] Louwe Kooijmans L.P., The Neolithic at the Lower Rhine, its structure in chronological and geographical respect. In: de Laet S.J. (Eds.), Acculturation and Contmuity in Atlantic Europe. Dissertationes Archaeologicae Gandenses, De Tempel, Brügge, 16, 1976, 150–173. Google Scholar

  • [21] Louwe Kooijmans L. P., Archaeology and Coastal Change in the Netherlands. In: Thompson F.H. (Eds.), Archaeology and Coastal Change. Society of Antiquaries, London, 1980a, 106–133. Google Scholar

  • [22] Fitch S., Thomson K., Gaffney V., Late Pleistocene and Holocene depositional system and the palaeogeography of the Dogger Bank, North Sea, Quaternary Research 2005, 64, 185–196. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [23] Weninger B., Schultig R., Bradtmöller M., Clare L., Collard M., Edinborough K., Hilpert J., Jöris O., Niekus M., Rholing E.J.,Wagner B., The catastrophic final flooding of Doggerland by the Storegga Slide tsunami, Documenta Praehistorica 2008, XXXV. UDK 550.344.4(261.26)”633” Google Scholar

  • [24] Ente P.J., The geology of the North part of Flevoland in relation to the human occupation in the Atlantic time (Swifterbant contribution 2), Helenium 1976, 16, 15–35. Google Scholar

  • [25] Bos I.J., Feiken H., Bunnik F., Schokker J., Influence of organics and clastic lake fills on distributary channel process in the distal Rhine-Meuse delta (The Netherlands), Paleogeography, Paleoclimatology, Paleoecology 2009, 285, 355–347. Google Scholar

  • [26] van de Plassche O., Sea-level change and water-level movements in the Netherlands during the Holocene, Mededelingen Rijks Geologische Dienst 1982, 36, 93. Google Scholar

  • [27] van de Plassche O., Bohncke S.J.P., Makaske B., van der Plicht J., Water-level changes in the Flevo area, central Netherlands (5300-1500 BC): Implications for relative mean sea-level rise in the Western Netherlands, Quaternary International 2005, 133– 134, 77–93. Google Scholar

  • [28] Golyeva A.A., Fitoliti i ih informacionaja rol v izucsenii prirodnih i arceologicseszkih objektov. Naiuk Rossziszkaja Akademija, Moskva, 2001a. Google Scholar

  • [29] Madella M., Alexandre A., Ball T., International Code for Phytolith Nomenclature 1.0, Annals of Botany 2005, 96, 253–260. Google Scholar

  • [30] Ball T.B., Brotherson J.D., Gardner J.S., A typologic and morphometric study of variation in phytoliths from inkhorn wheat (Triticum monococcum L.), Canadian Journal of Botany 1993, 71, 1182–1192. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [31] Ball T.B., Gardner J.S., Brotherson J.D., Identifying phytoliths produced by the inflorescence bracts of tree species of wheat (Triticum monococcum L., T. dicoccon Schrank., and T. aestivum L.) using computer-assisted image and statistical analysis, Journal of Archaeological Science 1996, 23, 619–632. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [32] Ball T.B., Gardner J.S., Anderson N., Identifying inflorescence phytoliths from selected species of wheat (Triticum monococcum, T. dicoccon, T. dicoccoides and T. aestivum) and barley (Hordeum vulgare and H. spontaneum), American Journal of Botany 1999, 86, 1615–1623. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [33] Berlin A.M., Ball T., Thompson R., Herberg S.C., Ptolemaic Agriculture, "Syrian Wheat", and Triticum aestivum, Journal of Archaeological Science 2003, 30, 115–121. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [34] Kaplan L., Smith M.B., Sneddon L.A., Cereal grain phytoliths of Southwest Asia and Europe. In: Rapp G., Mulholland S. (Eds.), Phytolith Systematics: Emerging Issues. Plenum Press, New York, 1992, 149–174. Google Scholar

  • [35] Lentfer C.J., Boyd W.E., Gojak D., Hope farm windmill: phytolith analysis of cereals in early colonial Australia, Journal of Archaeological Science 1997, 24, 841–86. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [36] Rosen A.M., Preliminary Identifictaion of Silica Skeletons from near Eastern Archaeological Sites: An Anatomical Approach. In: Rapp G., Mulholland S. (Eds.), Phytolith Systematics: Emerging Issues. Plenum Press, New York, 1992, 129–147. Google Scholar

  • [37] Tubb H.J., Hodson M.J., Hodson G.C., The inflorescence papillae of the Triticeae: a new tool for taxonomic and archaeological research, Annals of Botany 1993, 72, 537–545. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [38] Twiss P.C., Suess E., Smith R.N., Morphological classification of grass phytoliths, Soil Science Society of America, Proceedings 1969, 33, 109–115. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [39] Bennett K.D., Psimpoll – A QuickBASIC program than generates PostScript page description files of pollen diagrams, INQUA Commission for the Study of the Holocene: Working Group on Data-handling Methods Newsletter 1992, 8, 11–12. Google Scholar

  • [40] Golyeva A.A., Biomorphic analysis as a part of soil morphological investigations, Catena 2001, 43, 217–230. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [41] Pearsall D.M., Phytolith analysis of soil from the Lubok (I-1982- WS) and Bekes (I-1982-X5) sites, Mountain Province, Philippines. In: Bodber C.C. (Ed.), Prehistoric agricultural intensification in Central Bontoc, Mountain Province, Philippines. Ph. D. dissertation, Department of Antropology, University of Missouri-Columbia, 1986. Google Scholar

  • [42] Pearsall D.M., Paleoethnobotany. A Handbook of Procedures. Academic Press, Inc., San Diego, 1989. Google Scholar

  • [43] Balogh K., Kőzetszerkezet és üledékfácies. Report to University of Szeged, Szeged 1961 (in Hungarian). Google Scholar

  • [44] Fuchs T., Origine sedimentologie schicte, Denkschrift Akademischer Wissenschaften Wien 1895, 62, 369–448. Google Scholar

  • [45] Kelling G., Walton E.K., Load-cast structures: Their relationship to upper-surface and their mode of formation, Geological Magazine 1957, 44, 481–491. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [46] Sándor M., A hagyományos gazdálkodás ismeretanyaga és szókincse Berettyóújfaluban. (Words and data to traditional farming in Berettyóújfalu), Déri Múzeum Néprajzi Adattára (DMNA) 1963, 1680–1777 (in Hungarian). Google Scholar

  • [47] de Roever-Bonnet H., Rijpstra A.C., van Renesse M.A., Peen C.H., Helminth eggs and gregarines from coprolithes from the excavations at Swifterbant (Swifterbant Contribution 10), Helinium 1979, 19, 7–12. Google Scholar

  • [48] Smits E., Millard A.R., Nowell G., Pearson D.G., Isotopic investigation of diet and residental mobility in the Neolithic of the lower Rhine Basin. European Journal of Archaeology 2010, 13, 5–31. Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • [49] Vermereen C., Kuijper W., Pollen from coprolites and recent droppings: useful for reconstructing vegetations and determining the season of consumption? Analecta Praehistorica Leidensia 1996, 26, 213–220. Google Scholar

  • [50] Deckers P.H., de Roever J.P., van der Vaals J.D., Jagers, vissers en boeren in een prehistoric getijdengebied bíj Swifterbant. Z. W. O. Jaarboek, Utrecht, 1980. Google Scholar

About the article

Received: 2014-06-23

Accepted: 2014-12-05

Published Online: 2015-11-23


Citation Information: Open Geosciences, ISSN (Online) 2391-5447, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/geo-2015-0049.

Export Citation

©2015 G. Persaits et al.. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License. BY-NC-ND 3.0

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in