Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …


1 Issue per year

IMPACT FACTOR 2016: 1.426

CiteScore 2016: 1.42

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2016: 0.543
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2016: 0.854

Open Access
See all formats and pricing
More options …
Volume 38, Issue 3 (Sep 2011)


Surface dating by luminescence: An overview

Ioannis Liritzis
  • Laboratory of Archaeometry, Dept. of Mediterranean Studies, University of the Aegean, 1 Demokratias Ave, Rhodes, 85100, Greece
  • Email
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
Published Online: 2011-06-19 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/s13386-011-0032-7


Daylight radiation resets luminescence ‘clock’ to zero on rock surfaces, but transmission depends on the transparency of the rock. On burial, surfaces are no longer exposed to daylight and accumulation of trapped electrons takes place till the excavation. This reduction of luminescence as a function of depth fulfils the prerequisite criterion of daylight bleaching. Thus rock artefacts and monuments follow similar bleaching rationale as those for sediments. In limestone and marble, daylight can reach depths of 0.5–1 mm and up to 16 mm respectively, while for other igneous rocks e.g. quartz in granites, partial bleaching occurs up to 5mm depth under several hours of daylight exposures and almost complete beaching is achieved in the first 1 mm within about 1 min daylight exposure. The ‘quartz technique’ for limestone monuments containing traces of quartz enables their dating with Optically Stimulated Luminescence (OSL) techniques. The surface luminescence (thermoluminescence, TL or OSL) dating has been developed and further refined on various aspects of equivalent dose determination, complex radiation geometry, incomplete bleaching etc. A historical review of the development including important applications, along with some methodological aspects are discussed.

Keywords: luminescence; dating; artefacts; monuments; bleaching; OSL; TL; age

  • [1] Adamiec G and Aitken MJ, 1998. Dose-rate convertion factors: update. Ancient TL 16: 37–50. Google Scholar

  • [2] Aitken MJ, 1985. Thermoluminescence dating. Academic Press, London: 359pp. Google Scholar

  • [3] Aitken MJ, 1998. An introduction to optical dating. Oxford University Press, Oxford: 280pp. Google Scholar

  • [4] Baillif I, 2006. Development of single grain OSL dating of ceramic materials: spatially resolved measurement of absorbed dose. Radiation Measurements 41(7–8): 744–749, DOI 10.1016/j.radmeas.2006.04.012. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.radmeas.2006.04.012CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [5] Bailiff IK and Mikhailik VB, 2003. Spatially-resolved measurements of optically stimulated luminescence and time-resolved luminescence. Radiation Measurements 37(2): 151–159, DOI 10.1016/S1350-4487(02)00187-7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1350-4487(02)00187-7CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [6] Berger GW and Huntley DJ, 1989. Treatment of error in plateau values-caveat emptor. Ancient TL 7(2): 27–29. Google Scholar

  • [7] Duller GAT, 1995. Luminescence dating using single aliquots: methods and applications. Radiation Measurements, 24(3): 217–226, DOI 10.1016/1350-4487(95)00150-D. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/1350-4487(95)00150-DCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [8] Duller GAT, Bøtter-Jensen L and Markey BG, 1997. A luminescence imaging system based on a CCD camera. Radiation Measurements 27(2): 91–99, DOI 10.1016/S1350-4487(96)00120-5. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1350-4487(96)00120-5CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [9] Duller GAT, Bøtter-Jensen L and Murray AS, 2000. Optical dating of single sand-sized grains of quartz: sources of variability. Radiation Measurements 32(5–6): 453–457, DOI 10.1016/S1350-4487(00)00055-X. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1350-4487(00)00055-XCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [10] Galloway RB, 1993. Stimulation of luminescence using green light emitting diodes. Radiation Protection Dosimetry 47(1–4): 679–682. Google Scholar

  • [11] Galbraith RF, Roberts RG, Laslett GM, Yoshida H and Olley JM, 1999. Optical dating of single and multiple grains of quartz from Jinmium rock shelter, northern Australia: Part I, Experimental design and statistical models. Archaeometry 41(2): 339–364, DOI 10.1111/j.1475-4754.1999.tb00987.x. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4754.1999.tb00987.xCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [12] Greilich S, 2004. Über die Datierung von Gesteinsoberflächen mittels optisch stimulierter Lumineszenz. Ph.D Dissertation, University of Heidelberg (in German). Google Scholar

  • [13] Greilich S and Wagner GA, 2009. Light thrown on history — The dating of stone surfaces at the geoglyphs of Palpa using OSL, In: M Reidel and GA Wagner, eds., New Technologies for Archaeology, Natural Sciences in Archaeology, Chapter 16, Springer-Verlag Berlin: 271–283. Google Scholar

  • [14] Greilich S, Glasmacher UA and Wagner GA, 2002. Spatially resolved detection of luminescence: a unique tool for archaeochronometry. Naturwissenschaften 89: 371–375. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00114-002-0341-zGoogle Scholar

  • [15] Greilich S, Glasmacher GA and Wagner GA, 2005. Optical dating of granitic stone surfaces. Archaeometry 47(3): 645–665, DOI 10.1111/j.1475-4754.2005.00224.x. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4754.2005.00224.xCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [16] Habermann J, Schilles T, Kalchgruber R and Wagner GA, 2000. Steps towards surface dating using luminescence. Radiation Measurements 32(5–6): 847–851, DOI 10.1016/S1350-4487(00)00109-8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1350-4487(00)00066-4CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [17] Huntley DJ and Richards M, 1997. The age of the Diring Quriakh archaeological site. Ancient TL 15(2–3): 48–51. Google Scholar

  • [18] Kitis G, Liritzis I and Vafiadou A, 2002. Deconvolution of optical stimulated luminescence decay curves. Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry 254(1): 143–149, DOI 10.1023/A:1020862102754. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1020862102754CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [19] Kokkoris M and Liritzis I, 1997. Dose versus time for U-disequilibrium and revised dose-rate data for TL/ESR dating. European Journal PACT 45(I2): 281–294. Google Scholar

  • [20] Lefkowitz M, 2006.Archaeology and the politics of origins. In: Garrett G. Fagan, ed., Archaeological Fantasies: How Pseudoarchaeology Misrepresents the Past and Misleads the Public. Routledge: 180–202. Google Scholar

  • [21] Liritzis Y, 1986. The significance of gamma self-dose and beta-ranges in ceramics revisited. Revue d’Archeometrie 10: 95–102. Google Scholar

  • [22] Liritzis I., 1989. Dating of calcites: Some aspects of radiation survey in caves and dose-rates. Annales Geologiques Des Pays Helleniques 34(1): 123–136. Google Scholar

  • [23] Liritzis I and Kokkoris M, 1992. Revised dose-rate data for thermoluminescence / ESR dating. Nuclear Geophysics 6(3): 423–443. Google Scholar

  • [24] Liritzis I, 1994a. A new dating method by thermoluminescence of carved megalithic stone building. Comptes Rendus de l’ Academie des Sciences, Paris, 319, serie II, 319: 603–610 Google Scholar

  • [25] Liritzis I, 1994b. Archaeometry: dating the past. EKISTICS 368/364: 361–366. Google Scholar

  • [26] Liritzis I, 1995. Alternative determination of equivalent dose by green light emitting diodes optically stimulated luminescence using the unstable luminescence. Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry 190(1): 13–21, DOI 10.1007/BF02035632. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02035632CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [27] Liritzis I, 2000. Advances in thermo- and opto-luminescence dating of environmental materials (sedimentary deposits): Part I: Techniques. The GLOBAL NEST: the International Journal, 2(1): 3–27, and Part II: Applications, The GLOBAL NEST: the International Journal 2(1): 29–49. Google Scholar

  • [28] Liritzis I, 2001. Searching for precision of a new “luminescence clock” in calcitic rocks. Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry 247(3): 727–730, DOI 10.1023/A:1010696308875. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1010696308875CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [29] Liritzis I, 2010. Strofilas (Andros island, Greece): new evidence for the Cycladic final Neolithic period through novel dating methods using luminescence and obsidian hydration. Journal of Archaeological Science 37(6): 1367–1377, DOI 10.1016/j.jas.2009.12.041. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2009.12.041CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [30] Liritzis I and Galloway RB, 1999. Dating implications from daylight bleaching of Thermoluminescence of ancient marble. Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry 241(2): 361–368, DOI 10.1007/BF02347476. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02347476CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [31] Liritzis I and Vafiadou A., 2005. Dating by luminescence of ancient megalithic masonry. Mediterranean Archaeology and Archaeometry 5(1): 25–38. Google Scholar

  • [32] Liritzis I, Galloway RB and Theocaris PS, 1994. Thermoluminescence dating of ceramics revisited: optical stimulated luminescence of quartz single aliquot with green light emitting diodes. Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry, Letters 188(3): 189–198, DOI 10.1007/BF02164592. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02164592CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [33] Liritzis I, Guibert P, Foti F and Schvoerer M, 1996. Daylight bleaching of TL of calcites. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section B 117(3): 260–268, DOI 10.1016/0168-583X(96)00305-9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0168-583X(96)00305-9CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [34] Liritzis I, Galloway RB and Hong D, 1997a. Single aliquot dating of ceramics by green light stimulation of luminescence from quartz. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section B 132(3): 457–467, DOI 10.1016/S0168-583X(97)00456-4. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0168-583X(97)00456-4CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [35] Liritzis I, Guibert P, Foti F and Schvoerer M, 1997b. The Temple of Apollo (Delphi) strengthens novel thermoluminescence dating method. Geoarchaeology International 12: 479–496. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1520-6548(199708)12:5<479::AID-GEA3>3.0.CO;2-XGoogle Scholar

  • [36] Liritzis I, Katsonopoulou D, Soter S and Galloway RB, 2001. In search of ancient Helike, gulf of Corinth, Greece. Journal of Coastal Research 17(1): 118–123. Google Scholar

  • [37] Liritzis I, Galloway RB, Hong D and Kyparisi-Apostolika N, 2002. OSL dating of three prehistoric ceramics from Theopetra Cave, Greece: a case study. Mediterranean Archaeology and Archaeometry 2(2): 35–43. Google Scholar

  • [38] Liritzis I, Sideris C, Vafiadou A and Mitsis J, 2007. Mineralogical petrological and radioactivity aspects of some building material from Egyptian Old Kingdom monuments. Journal of Cultural Heritage 9(1): 1–13, DOI 10.1016/j.culher.2007.03.009. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.culher.2007.03.009CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [39] Liritzis I, Kitis G, Galloway RB, Vafiadou A, Tsirliganis N and Polymeris G, 2008a. Probing luminescence dating of archaeologically significant carved rock types. Mediterranean Archaeology and Archaeometry 8(1): 61–79. Google Scholar

  • [40] Liritzis I, Sideris C, Vafiadou A and Mitsis J, 2008b. Mineralogical, petrological and radioactivity aspects of building material from Egyptian Old Kingdom monuments. Journal of Cultural Heritage 9(1): 1–13, DOI 10.1016/j.culher.2007.03.009. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.culher.2007.03.009CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [41] Liritzis I, Zacharias N and Polymeris G, 2010a. Surface luminescence dating of ‘Dragon Houses’ and Armena Gate at Styra (Euboea, Greece). Mediterranean Archaeology and Archaeometry10(3), 65–81. Google Scholar

  • [42] Liritzis I, Zacharias N, Polymeris G, Kitis G, Ernston K, Sudhaus D, Neumaier A, Mayer W, Rappengluck MA, and Rappengluck B, 2010b. The Chiemgau meteorite impact and tsunami event (southeast Germany): First OSL dating. Mediterranean Archaeology and Archaeometry 10(4): 17–33 (in press, online www.rhodes.aegean.gr/maa_journal). Google Scholar

  • [43] Liritzis I, Drivaliari A, Polymeris G and Katagas C, 2010c. New quartz technique for the OSL dating of limestone. Mediterranean Archaeology and Archaeometry 10(1): 81–87. Google Scholar

  • [44] Martini M and Sebilia E, 2001. Radiation in archaeometry: archaeological dating. Radiation Physics and Chemistry 61(3–6): 241–246, DOI 10.1016/S0969-806X(01)00247-X. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0969-806X(01)00247-XCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [45] Morgenstein ME, Luo S, Ku TL and Feathers J, 2003. Uranium series and luminescence dating of volcanic lithic artefacts. Archaeometry 45(3): 503–518, DOI 10.1111/1475-4754.00124. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1475-4754.00124CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [46] Murari MK, Achyuthan H and Singhvi AK, 2007. Luminescence studies on the sediments laid down by the December 2004 tsunami event: Prospects for the dating of papaeo tsunamis and for the estimation of sediment flow. Current Science 92(3): 367–371. Google Scholar

  • [47] Murray AS and Roberts RG, 1997. Determining the burial time of single grains of quartz using optically stimulated luminescence. Earth and Planetary Science Letters 152(1–4): 163–180, DOI 10.1016/S0012-821X(97)00150-7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0012-821X(97)00150-7CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [48] Murray AS and Wintle AG, 2000. Luminescence dating of quartz using an improved single-aliquot regenerative-dose protocol. Radiation Measurements 32(1): 57–73, DOI 10.1016/S1350-4487(99)00253-X. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1350-4487(99)00253-XCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [49] Murray AS, Roberts RG and Wintle AG, 1997. Equivalent dose measurements using a single aliquot of quartz. Radiation Measurements 27(2): 171–184, DOI 10.1016/S1350-4487(96)00130-8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1350-4487(96)00130-8CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [50] Richards P, 1992. Luminescence dating of quartzite from Diring Yuriakh site. M.S.c thesis, Simon Fraser University, Canada. Google Scholar

  • [51] Singhvi AK, Chauhan N and Biswas RH, 2010. A survey of some new approaches in extending the maximum age limit and accuracy of luminescence application to archeological chronometry. Mediterranean Archaeology & Archaeometry 10(4): 9–15. Google Scholar

  • [52] Theocaris P, Liritzis I and Galloway RB, 1997. Dating of two Hellenic pyramids by a novel application of thermoluminescence. Journal of Archaeological Science 24(5): 399–405, DOI 10.1006/jasc.1996.0124. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/jasc.1996.0124CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [53] Vafiadou A, Murray AS and Liritzis I, 2007. Optically stimulated luminescence (OSL) dating investigations of rock and underlying soil from three case studies. Journal of Archaeological Science 34(10): 1659–1669, DOI 10.1016/j.jas.2006.12.004. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2006.12.004CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [54] Vaz JE, 1983. The effect of insolation on the thermoluminescence response of an archaeological stone sculpture. PACT 9: 335–342. Google Scholar

  • [55] Wintle AG and Huntley DJ, 1980. Thermoluminescence dating of ocean sediments. Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences 17(3): 348–360, DOI 10.1139/e80-034. http://dx.doi.org/10.1139/e80-034CrossrefGoogle Scholar

About the article

Published Online: 2011-06-19

Published in Print: 2011-09-01

Citation Information: Geochronometria, ISSN (Online) 1897-1695, DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/s13386-011-0032-7.

Export Citation

© 2011 Silesian University of Technology, Gliwice, Poland. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License. BY-NC-ND 3.0

Citing Articles

Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.

C.D. Athanassas, L. García Sanjuán, K. Stamoulis, R. Lineros Romero, E. Carinou, and R. Anglada Curado
Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports, 2017, Volume 16, Page 240
Georgina E. King, Benny Guralnik, Pierre G. Valla, and Frédéric Herman
Chemical Geology, 2016, Volume 446, Page 3
Andrea Junge, Johanna Lomax, Ruth Shahack-Gross, Zachary C. Dunseth, Israel Finkelstein, and Markus Fuchs
Geoarchaeology, 2016, Volume 31, Number 6, Page 550
C.D. Athanassas, G.O. Rollefson, A. Kadereit, D. Kennedy, K. Theodorakopoulou, Y.M. Rowan, and A. Wasse
Journal of Archaeological Science, 2015, Volume 64, Page 1
George S. Polymeris, George Kitis, Nafiye G. Kiyak, Eleni Theodosoglou, Nestor C. Tsirliganis, Ahmet Ertek, and Ahmet E. Erginal
Quaternary International, 2016, Volume 401, Page 184
Ioannis Liritzis, Vassilios Aravantinos, George S. Polymeris, Nikolaos Zacharias, Ioannis Fappas, George Agiamarniotis, Ioanna K. Sfampa, Asimina Vafiadou, and George Kitis
Comptes Rendus Palevol, 2015, Volume 14, Number 3, Page 219
Richard G. Roberts, Zenobia Jacobs, Bo Li, Nathan R. Jankowski, Alastair C. Cunningham, and Anatoly B. Rosenfeld
Journal of Archaeological Science, 2015, Volume 56, Page 41
Trine Freiesleben, Reza Sohbati, Andrew Murray, Mayank Jain, Sahar al Khasawneh, Søren Hvidt, and Bo Jakobsen
Radiation Measurements, 2015, Volume 81, Page 16
Ioannis Liritzis and Asimina Vafiadou
Journal of Cultural Heritage, 2015, Volume 16, Number 2, Page 134
George S. Polymeris, Valeria Giannoulatou, Ioanna K. Sfampa, Nestor C. Tsirliganis, and George Kitis
Journal of Luminescence, 2014, Volume 153, Page 245
Reza Sohbati, Andrew Murray, Mayank Jain, Kristina Thomsen, Seong-Chan Hong, Keewook Yi, and Jeong-Heon Choi
Radiation Measurements, 2013, Volume 51-52, Page 67
Reza Sohbati, Andrew S. Murray, Jan-Pieter Buylaert, Nelson A. C. Almeida, and Pedro P. Cunha
Boreas, 2012, Volume 41, Number 3, Page 452

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in