Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Global Jurist

Ed. by Mattei, Ugo / Monti, Alberto

3 Issues per year


CiteScore 2016: 0.07

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2016: 0.148
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2016: 0.008

Online
ISSN
1934-2640
See all formats and pricing
More options …

Living on the Edge of Queer Theory and Canada’s Uncanny Pluralism: Queer Religious Bodies as Constitutional Strangers

Nicolas Blanc
  • Corresponding author
  • Department of Law, University of Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France; University of Montreal, Montréal, QC, Canada
  • Email
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
Published Online: 2014-05-27 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/gj-2014-0007

Abstract

This paper investigates alternative critical insights into the conflict of religion and queerness in Canadian constitutional law, through the tools offered by Queer Theories. In Canada, this implies the adoption of a critical phenomenology of pluralism as the object of Queer Theory. Adjudicating pluralism becomes a sovereign performance, and publicness a zone of national intimacy. The conflict of rights produces a typology of queer religious bodies as constitutional strangers through a range of capacities that a body can or cannot do. Will be argued that the norm of religious citizenship is heteronormativity, and the norm of queer citizenship deciphers the ascendency of male whiteness.

Keywords: Queer Theory; religion; queerness; pluralism; bodies; Canada; constitutional law

Bibliography

  • Abrams, K. 2000. Afterword: Critical Strategy and the Judicial Evasion of Difference. Cornell Law Review 85:1426–1445.Google Scholar

  • Ahmed, Sara. 2000. Strange Encounters: Embodied Other in Post-Coloniality. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

  • Ahmed, Sara. 2007a. Queer Phenomenology. Orientations, Objects, Others. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar

  • Ahmed, S. 2007b. A Phenomenology of Whiteness. Feminist Theory 8(2):149–168.Google Scholar

  • Beckton, Clare F. 1987. Section 27 and Section 15 of the Charter. In Multiculturalism and the Charter: A Legal Perspective, edited by Canadian Human Rights Foundation, 1–13. Vancouver, BC: Carswell.Google Scholar

  • Berlant, Lauren G. 1991. The Anatomy of National Fantasy: Hawthorne, Utopia, and Everyday Life. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

  • Berlant, Lauren G. 2005. The Epistemology of State Emotion. In Dissent in Dangerous Times, edited by Austin Sarat, 46–78. Ann Arbor, MI: The University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar

  • Berlant, Lauren G. 2012. Desire/Love. Brooklyn, NY: Puncton Books.Google Scholar

  • Bhabha, F. 2009. Between Exclusion and Assimilation: Experimentalizing Multiculturalism. McGill Law Journal 54(1):45–90.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bhamra, Meena K. 2011. The Challenges of Justice in Diverse Societies. Constitutionalism and Pluralism. Farnham: Ashgate.Google Scholar

  • Blache, P. 2000. Le Droit à l’égalité: Interface entre Droits Individuels et Droits Collectifs. The Canadian Bar Review 79(2):1–26.Google Scholar

  • Blevins, John. 2012. Becoming Undone and Becoming Human. Sexual and Religious Selves in the Thought of Michel Foucault and Judith Butler. In Queer Religion. Vol. II: LGBT Movements and Queering Religion, edited by Donald L. Boisvert and Jay Emerson Johnson, 1–20. Santa Barbara, CA: Praeger.Google Scholar

  • Boisvert, Donald L., and Jay Emerson Johnson. 2012. Introducing Queer Religion. In Queer Religion. Vol. I: Homosexuality in Modern Religious History, edited by Donald L. Boisvert and Jay Emerson Johnson, IX–XX. Santa Barbara, CA: Praeger.Google Scholar

  • Bram, Christopher. 2012. Eminent Outlaws. The Gay Writers Who Changed America. New York, NY: Twelve.Google Scholar

  • Brown, D. M. 2000. Freedom from of Freedom For?: Religion as a Case Study in Defining the Content of Charter Rights. University of British Columbia Law Review 33(3):551–615.Google Scholar

  • Brown, Wendy. 2002. Suffering the Paradoxes of Rights. In Left Legalism/Left Critique, edited by Wendy Brown and Janet Halley, 420–434. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar

  • Brown, D. M. 2004. Reconciling Equality and Other Rights: Paradigm Lost? National Journal of Constitutional Law 15(1):1–33.Google Scholar

  • Brown, Wendy. 2010. Walled States, Waning Sovereignty. New York, NY: Zone.Google Scholar

  • Bumiller, Kristin. 1988. The Civil Rights Society. The Social Construction of Victims. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar

  • Butler, Judith. 2002a. La Vie Psychique du Pouvoir. Paris: Léo Scheer.Google Scholar

  • Butler, Judith. 2002b. Is Kinship Always Already Heterosexual? In Left Legalism/Left Critique, edited by Wendy Brown and Janet Halley, 229–258. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar

  • Butler, Judith. 2005. Le Récit de Soi. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar

  • Cameron, Deborah, and Don Kulick. 2003. Language and Sexuality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Cobb, Michael. 2006. God Hates Fags: The Rhetorics of Religious Violence. New York, NY: New York University Press.Google Scholar

  • Cooper, D. 2000. And You Can’t Find It Nowhere’: Relocating Identity and Structure Within Equality Jurisprudence. Journal of Law and Society 27(2):249–272.Google Scholar

  • Corriveau, Patrice. 2011. Judging Homosexuals. A History of Gay Persecution in Quebec and France. Vancouver, BC: University of British Columbia Press.Google Scholar

  • Cossman, B. 1997. Turning the Gaze Back on Itself: Comparative Law, Feminist Legal Studies, and the Postcolonial Project. Utah Law Review 2:525–544.Google Scholar

  • Cossman, B. 2002. Lesbians, Gay Men, and the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. Osgoode Hall Law Journal 40(3–4):223–248.Google Scholar

  • Cossman, B. 2004. Sexuality, Queer Theory, and Feminism After: Reading and Rereading the Sexual Subject. McGill Law Journal 49:847–876.Google Scholar

  • Cossman, Brenda. 2007. Sexual Citizens. The Legal and Cultural Regulation of Sex and Belonging. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

  • Cossman, B., and B. Ryder. 1996. Custom Censorship and the Charter: The Little Sisters Case. Constitutional Forum 7(4):103–112.Google Scholar

  • Cover, Robert. 1992. Nomos and Narrative. In Narrative, Violence, and the Law. the Essays of Robert Cover, edited by Martha Minow, Ryan Michael and Austin Sarat, 95–172. Ann Arbor, MI: The University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar

  • Cruz-Malavé, Arnaldo, and Martin F. Manalansan, ed. 2002. Queer Globalizations: Citizenship and the Afterlife of Colonialism. New York, NY: New York University Press.Google Scholar

  • Dauvergne, C. 2007. Citizenship as a Vengeance. Theoretical Inquiries in Law 8(2):489–508.Google Scholar

  • Duggan, Lisa. 2004. The Twilight of Equality? Neoliberalism, Cultural Politics, and the Attack on Democracy. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.Google Scholar

  • Eaton, M. 1994. Patently Confused: Complex Inequality, and Canada v. Mossop. Review of Constitutional Studies 1(2):203–245.Google Scholar

  • Eng, D.L., J Halberstam, and J. E. Muñoz. 2005. What’s Queer About Queer Studies Now? Social Text 23(3–4):1–17.Google Scholar

  • Esau, Alvin. 2008. Living by Different Law: Legal Pluralism, Freedom of Religion, and Illiberal Religious Groups. In Law and Religious Pluralism in Canada, edited by Richard Moon, 110–139. Vancouver, BC: University of British Columbia Press.Google Scholar

  • Eskridge, W. N. Jr. 1994. Gay Legal Narratives. Stanford Law Review 46:607–646.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Eskridge, W. N. Jr. 1996–1997. A Jurisprudence of “Coming Out”: Religion, Homosexuality and Collisions of Liberty and Equality in American Public Law. Yale Law Journal 106:2411–2474.Google Scholar

  • Faraday, Fay, Margaret A. Denike, and M. Kate Stephenson. 2009. Introduction. In Pursuit of Substantive Equality. In Making Equality Rights Real. Securing Substantive Equality under the Charter, edited by Fay Faraday, Margaret A. Denike and M. Kate Stephenson, 9–30. Toronto, ON: Irwin Law.Google Scholar

  • Foucault, Michel. 2001. Sexualité et Solitude. In Dits et Écrits II, edited by Daniel Defert and François Ewald, 987–997. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar

  • Fournier, Pascale. 2010. Muslim Marriage in Western Courts. Lost in Transplantation. Farnham: Ashgate.Google Scholar

  • Fournier, P. 2012. Calculating Claims: Jewish and Muslim Women Navigating Religion, Economics, and Law in Canada. International Journal of Law in Context 8(1):47–72.Google Scholar

  • Gaudreault-Desbiens, Jean-François, ed. 2009. Le Droit, la Religion et le “Raisonnable”.Le Fait Religieux entre Monisme Étatique et Pluralisme Juridique. Montreal, QC: Thémis.Google Scholar

  • Gaudreault-Desbiens, Jean-François. 2010. The State Management of Legal and Cultural Diversity in Canada. In Cultural Diversity and Law. State Responses from Around the World, edited by Marie-Claire Foblets, Jean-François Gaudreault-Desbiens and Alison Dundes Rentelm, 195–234. Brussels: Bruylant.Google Scholar

  • Gaudreault-Desbiens, J.-F., and D Pinard. 2003–2004. Les Minorités en Droit Public Canadien. Revue de Droit de l’université de Sherbrooke 34:197–228.Google Scholar

  • Gilbert, D. 2003. Time to Regroup: Rethinking Section 15 of the Charter. McGill Law Journal 43:627–649.Google Scholar

  • Gotell, L. 2002. Queering Law: Not by Vriend. Canadian Journal of Law and Society17(1):89–113.Google Scholar

  • Greschner, D. 1997–1998. The Right to Belong: The Promise of Vriend. National Journal of Constitutional Law 9:417–440.Google Scholar

  • Greschner, D. 2001–2002. The Purpose of Canadian Equality Rights. Review of Constitutional Studies 6(2):291–323.Google Scholar

  • Halberstam, Judith. 2005. In a Queer Time and Place. Transgender Bodies, Subcultural Lives. New York, NY: New York University Press.Google Scholar

  • Halberstam, Judith. 2011. The Queer Art of Failure. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar

  • Halley, Janet. 1998. Gay Rights and Identity Imitation: Issues in the Ethics of Representation. In The Politics of Law: A Progressive Critic. 3rd ed., edited by David Kairys, 115–146. New York, NY: Basic Books.Google Scholar

  • Halperin, D. M. 2003. The Normalization of Queer Studies. Journal of Homosexuality 45(2–4):339–343.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Halperin, David M. 2012. How to Be Gay. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

  • Heger, Heinz. 1994. The Men with the Pink Triangle. The True Life-and-Death Story of Homosexuals in the Nazi Death Camps. New York, NY: Alyson Books.Google Scholar

  • Herman, D. 1990. Are We Family?: Lesbian Rights and Women’s Liberation. Osgoode Hall Law Journal 28(4):789–815.Google Scholar

  • Herman, Didi. 1994. Rights of Passage. Struggles for Gay and Lesbian Legal Equality. Toronto, ON: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar

  • Hogg, Peter W. 2010. Constitutional Law of Canada, 2010 Student Edition. Toronto, ON: Carswell.Google Scholar

  • Huffer, Lynne. 2010. Mad for Foucault. Rethinking the Foundations of Queer Theory. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar

  • Isin, Engin F. 2002. Being Political. Genealogies of Citizenship. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar

  • Iyer, N. 1993. Categorical Denials: Equality Rights and the Shaping of Social Identity. Queen’s Law Journal 12:179–207.Google Scholar

  • Jordan, Mark D. 2011. Recruiting Young Love. How Christians Talk About Homosexuality. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar

  • Katyal, S. K. 2006. Sexuality and Sovereignty: The Global Limits and Possibilities of a Lawrence. William and Mary Bill of Rights Journal 14(4):1429–1492.Google Scholar

  • Kendall, Chistopher N. 2004. Gay Male Pornography. An Issue of Sex Discrimination. Vancouver, BC: University of British Columbia Press.Google Scholar

  • Kimmel, D., and D. J. Robinson. 2001. Sex, Crime, Pathology: Homosexuality and Criminal Code Reform in Canada, 1949–1969. Canadian Journal of Law and Society 16(1):147–165.Google Scholar

  • Kislowicz, Howard. Freedom of Religion and Canada’s Commitment to Multiculturalism: A Critical Analysis of the Rights-Based Approach. LL.M’s thesis, University of Toronto, 2009.Google Scholar

  • Kislowicz, H. 2011. Judging the Rules of Belonging. University of British Columbia Law Review 44(2):287–329.Google Scholar

  • Kristeva, Julia. 1982. Powers of Horror. An Essay on Abjection. Translated by Leon S. Roudiez. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar

  • Kropp, D. 1997. Categorial’ Failure: Canada’s Equality Jurisprudence – Changing Notions of Identity and the Legal Subject. Queen’s Law Journal 23(1):201–230.Google Scholar

  • Lahey, Kathleen A. 1999. Are We “Persons” Yet? Law and Sexuality in Canada. Toronto, ON: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar

  • Lenon, S. J. 2005. Marrying Citizens! Raced Subjects? Re-Thinking the Terrain of Equal Marriage Discourse. Canadian Journal of Women and Law 17(2):405–421.Google Scholar

  • Lenon, S. J. 2008. What’s so Civil about Marriage? The Racial Pedagogy of Same-Sex Marriage in Canada. Darkmatter Journal 3:26–36.Google Scholar

  • Lenon, S. J. 2011. “Why Is Our Love an Issue?”: Same-Sex Marriage and the Racial Politics of the Ordinary. Social Identities 17(3):351–372.Google Scholar

  • Levine, R. J., and J. W. Penney. 2005. The Evolving Approach to Section 15(1): Diminished Rights or Bolder Communities? Supreme Court Law Review (2d) 29:137–168.Google Scholar

  • Lyons, Jonathan. 2012. Islam Through Western Eyes. From the Crusades to the War on Terrorism. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar

  • MacDougall, Bruce. 2000. Queer Judgments. Homosexuality, Expression, and the Courts in Canada. Toronto, ON: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar

  • MacDougall, B. 2006. Refusing to Officiate at Same-Sex Civil Marriages. Saskatchewan Law Review 69:351–373.Google Scholar

  • Mackling, A. 2007. Who Is the Citizen’s Other? Considering the Heft of Citizenship. Theoretical Inquiries in Law 8(2):333–366.Google Scholar

  • Magnet, Joseph E. 2005. Multiculturalism and Collective Rights: Approaches to Section 27. In Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. 4th ed., edited by Gerald-A. Beaudoin and Errol Mendes, 1261–1316. Toronto, ON: Lexis Nexis.Google Scholar

  • Mahmood, Saba. 2012. Politics of Piety. The Islamic Revival and the Feminist Subject. Revised ed. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

  • Merleau-Ponty, Maurice. 2002. Phenomenology of Perception. Translated by Colin Smith. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

  • Michel, H. R. 1987. The Case for the Black Family. Harvard BlackLetter Journal 4:21–24.Google Scholar

  • Minow, Martha. 1990. Making All the Difference. Inclusion, Exclusion and American Law. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

  • Moon, R. 2003. Sexual Orientation Equality and Religious Freedom in the Public Schools: A Comment on TWU v. BCCT, and Chamberlain v. Surrey. Review of Constitutional Studies 8(2):228–284.Google Scholar

  • Moon, Richard. 2008. Introduction: Law and Religious Pluralism in Canada. In Law and Religious Pluralism in Canada, edited by Richard Moon, 1–20. Vancouver, BC: University of British Columbia Press.Google Scholar

  • Moon, Richard. 2011. The Supreme Court of Canada’s Attempt to Reconcile Freedom of Religion and Sexual Orientation Equality in the Public Schools. In Faith, Politics and Sexual Diversity in Canada and the United States, edited by David Rayside and Clyde Wilcox,321–338. Vancouver, BC: University of British Columbia Press.Google Scholar

  • Moon, R. 2012. Freedom of Religion under the Charter of Rights: The Limits of State Neutrality. University of British Columbia Law Review 45(2):497–550.Google Scholar

  • Morissette, Y.-M. 2000. Quelques Points de Repères sur l’égalité dans une Société Diversifiée. The Canadian Bar Review 79(no. 2):81–98.Google Scholar

  • Muñoz, José E. 2009. Cruising Utopia: The Then and There of Queer Futurity. New York, NY: New York University Press.Google Scholar

  • Nedelsky, Jennifer, and Roger Hutchinson. 2008. Clashes of Principle, and the Possibility of Dialogue: A Case Study of Same-Sex Marriage in the United Church of Canada. In Law and Religious Pluralism in Canada, edited by Richard Moon, 41–64. Vancouver, BC: University of British Columbia Press.Google Scholar

  • Nejaime, D. 2009. Inclusion, Accommodation, and Recognition: Accounting for Differences Based on Religion, and Sexual Orientation. Harvard Journal of Law and Gender 32:303–381.Google Scholar

  • Ogilvie, Margaret H. 2003. Religious Institutions and the Law in Canada. 2nd ed. Toronto, ON: Irwin Law.Google Scholar

  • Ontario Human Rights Commission. 2012 The Shadow of the Law: Surveying the Case Law Dealing with Competing Rights Claims. February, 2012. http://http://www.ohrc.on.ca/en/shadow-law-surveying-case-law-dealing-competing-rights-claims.

  • Onwuachi-Willig, A. 2006. Undercover Other. California Law Review 94:873–906.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Pitt, R. N. 2009. “Still Looking for My Jonathan”: Gay Black Men’s Management of Religious and Sexual Identity Conflicts. Journal of Homosexuality 57(1):39–53.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Provencher, D. M. 2011. Coming Out à l’oriental: Maghrebi-French Performances of Gender, Sexuality, and Religion. Journal of Homosexuality 58(6–7):812–833.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Puar, Jasbir K. 2007. Terrorist Assemblages. Homonationalism in Queer Times. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar

  • Raz, Joseph. 1988. The Morality of Freedom. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

  • Roden, Frederik, ed. 2009. Jewish/Christian/Queer – Crossroads and Identities. Fornham: Ashgate.Google Scholar

  • Rose, Nikolas. 1999. Powers of Freedom. Reframing Political Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Ruffolo, David V. 2009. Post-Queer Politics. Farnham: Ashgate.Google Scholar

  • Ryder, Bruce. 2008. The Canadian Conception of Equal Religious Citizenship. In Law and Religious Pluralism in Canada, edited by Richard Moon, 87–109. Vancouver, BC: University of British Columbia Press.Google Scholar

  • Kosovfsky Sedgwick, Eve. 1991. Epistemology of the Closet. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar

  • Shachar, A. 2005. Religion, State, and the Problem of Gender: New Modes of Citizenship and Governance in Diverse Societies. McGill Law Journal 50:49–88.Google Scholar

  • Shipley, Heather. 2009. The Religious Construction of Sexual Citizenship: The Role of Religious Ideologies in Canadian Law. PhD diss., University of Ottawa.Google Scholar

  • Smith, Miriam. 1999. Lesbian and Gay Rights in Canada. Social Movements and Equality-Seeking, 1971–1995. Toronto, ON: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar

  • Spinner-Halev, J. 2008. Liberalism and Religion: Against Congruence. Theoretical Inquiries in Law 9:553–572.Google Scholar

  • Spivak, Gayatri C. 1988. Can the Subaltern Speak? In Marxism and the Interpretation of Culture, edited by Cari Nelson and Lawrence Grossberg, 271–316. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar

  • Stringfellow, Roland. 2012. Soul Work. Developing a Black L.G.B.T. Theology. In Queer Religion. Vol. I: Homosexuality in Modern Religious History, edited by Donald L. Boisvert and Jay Emerson Johnson, 113–126. Santa Barbara, CA: Praeger.Google Scholar

  • Stychin, C. 1994. A Postmodern Constitutionalism: Equality Rights, Identity Politics, and the Canadian National Imagination. Dalhousie Law Journal 17(1):61–82.Google Scholar

  • Sullivan, Nikki. 2003. A Critical Introduction to Queer Theory. New York, NY: New York University Press.Google Scholar

  • Tempelman, C. 1999. Constructions of Cultural Identity: Multiculturalism and Exclusion. Political Studies XLVII:17–31.Google Scholar

  • Tremblay, Luc B. 2009. Religion, Tolérance et Laïcité: Le Tournant Multiculturel de la Cour Suprême. In Le Droit, la Religion et le “Raisonnable”. Le Fait Religieux entre Monisme Étatique et Pluralisme Juridique, edited by Jean-François Gaudreault-Desbiens, 213–259. Montréal, QC: Thémis.Google Scholar

  • Volpp, L. 2007. The Culture of Citizenship. Theoretical Inquiries in Law 8(2):570–601.Google Scholar

  • Walton, G. 2006. “Fag Church”: Men Who Integrate Gay and Christian Identities. Journal of Homosexuality 51(2):1–17.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Warner, Michael. 2005. Publics and Counterpublics. New York, NY: Zone.Google Scholar

  • Weston, Kath. 1997. Families We Choose. Lesbians, Gays, Kinship. Revised ed. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar

  • Wiegman, Robyn. 2012. Object Lessons. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar

  • Woehrling, J. 1998. L’obligation d’accommodement Raisonnable et l’adaptation de la Société à la Diversité Religieuse. McGill Law Journal 43:325–401.Google Scholar

Case Law/Legislation

  • Schedule B to the Canada Act 1982, 1982, c. 11 (U.K.) (The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms):Google Scholar

  • Section 2 (a) (freedom of religion): “Everyone has the following fundamental freedoms: (a) freedom of conscience and religion.”Google Scholar

  • Section 15(1) (equality rights): “Every individual is equal before and under the law and has the right to the equal protection and equal benefit of the law without discrimination and, in particular, without discrimination based on race, national or ethnic origin, color, religion, sex, age or mental or physical disability.”Google Scholar

  • Partland v. Partland, [1960] O.J. No. 242.Google Scholar

  • Caldwell v. Stuart, [1984] 2 S.C.R. 603.Google Scholar

  • R. v. Big M Drug Mart Ltd, [1985] 1 S.C.R. 295.Google Scholar

  • R. v. Edwards Books & Art Ltd, [1986] 2 S.C.R. 713.Google Scholar

  • R. v. Holmes, [1988] 1 S.C.R. 914.Google Scholar

  • Andrews v. Law Society of British Columbia, [1989] 1 S.C.R. 143.Google Scholar

  • R. v. Butler, [1992] 1 S.C.R. 452.Google Scholar

  • Moge v. Moge, [1992] 3 S.C.R. 813.Google Scholar

  • Canada (P.G.) v. Mossop, [1993] 1 S.C.R. 554.Google Scholar

  • Dagenais v. Société Radio-Canada, [1994] 3 S.C.R. 835.Google Scholar

  • Egan v. Canada, [1995] 2 S.C.R. 513.Google Scholar

  • Chamberlain v. Surrey S.D. No. 36, [1998] B.C.J. No. 2923.Google Scholar

  • M. v. H., [1999] 2 S.C.R. 3.Google Scholar

  • Vriend v. Alberta, [1998] 1 S.C.R. 493.Google Scholar

  • Law v. Canada (Ministère de l’emploi et de l’immigration), [1999] 1 S.C.R. 497.Google Scholar

  • Chamberlain v. Surrey S.D. No. 36, [2000] B.C.J. No. 1875, 2000, BCCA 519.Google Scholar

  • Little Sisters Book and Art Emporium v. Canada (Ministère de la Justice), [2000]2 S.C.R. 1120.Google Scholar

  • Owens v. Sasktachewan (Human Rights Commission) (2001), 40 C.H.R.R. D/197.Google Scholar

  • Trinity Western University v. B.C.C.T., [2001] 1 S.C.R. 772.Google Scholar

  • Hall (Litigation Guardian of) v. Powers, [2002] O.J. No. 1803.Google Scholar

  • Brokie v. Brillinger, [2002] O.J. No. 2375.Google Scholar

  • Owens v. Sasktachewan (Human Rights Commission), 2002 SKQB 506.Google Scholar

  • Chamberlain v. Surrey School District No.36, [2002] 4 S.C.R. 710.Google Scholar

  • Halpern et al. v. Canada (A.-G.), [2003] O.J. 2268.Google Scholar

  • Kempling v. British Columbia Board of Teachers, 2004 BCSC 133.Google Scholar

  • Syndicat Northcrest v. Amselem, [2004] 2 S.C.R. 551Google Scholar

  • Renvoi Relatif au mariage entre personnes du même sexe, [2004] 3 S.C.R. 698.Google Scholar

  • Smith and Chymyshyn v. Knights of Columbus, Sandra Hauser and Elmer Lazar, 2005 BCHRT 544.Google Scholar

  • Kempling v. British Columbia Board of Teachers, 2005 BCCA 327.Google Scholar

  • Owens v. Sasktachewan (Human Rights Commission), 2006 SKCA 41.Google Scholar

  • Heintz v. Christian Horizons, 2008 HRTO 22 (CanLII).Google Scholar

  • Protection de la jeunesse – 082692, [2008] J.Q. No. 19742.Google Scholar

  • R. v. Kapp, [2008] 2 S.C.R. 483.Google Scholar

  • Nichols v. M.J., (2009) SKQB 299.Google Scholar

  • Bentley v. Anglican Synod of the Diocese of New Westminster, [2009] B.C.J. No. 2336, 2009 BCSC 1608.Google Scholar

  • Alberta v. Hutterian Brethern of Wilson Colony, [2009] 2 S.C.R. 567.Google Scholar

  • Ontario Human Rights Commission et al. v. Christian Horizons, 2010 ONSC 2105, 102 O.R. (3d) 267.Google Scholar

  • Bentley v. Anglican Synod of the Diocese of New Westminster, [2010] B.C.J. No. 2201, 2010 BCCA 506.Google Scholar

  • R. v. N.S., 2010 ONCA 670 (CanLII).Google Scholar

  • Bentley v. Anglican Synod of the Diocese of New Westminster, [2011] S.C.R. 26.Google Scholar

  • S.L. v. Commission scolaire des Chênes, [2012] 1 S.C.R. 235.Google Scholar

  • Saskatchewan (Human Rights Commission) v. Whatcott, [2013] 1 S.C.R. 467.Google Scholar

About the article

Published Online: 2014-05-27

Published in Print: 2013-08-01


Citation Information: Global Jurist, ISSN (Online) 1934-2640, ISSN (Print) 2194-5675, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/gj-2014-0007.

Export Citation

©2013 by Walter de Gruyter Berlin / Boston. Copyright Clearance Center

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in