Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Glottotheory

International Journal of Theoretical Linguistics

Ed. by Roelcke, Thorsten / Kelih, Emmerich / Köhler, Reinhard

Editorial Board: Altmann, Gabriel / Andreev, Sergey / Bär, Jochen A. / Embleton, Sheila / Gries, Stefan Th. / Grzybek, Peter / Leiss, Elisabeth / Liu, Haitao / Macutek, Ján / Bruch Nemcová, Emilia / Patrás, Vladimír / Sanada, Haruko / Wilson, Andrew


CiteScore 2018: 0.19

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.113
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 0.674

Online
ISSN
2196-6907
See all formats and pricing
More options …

Are Languages like Atoms? On Modelling Language Spread as a Physicist

Katharina Prochazka / Gero Vogl
Published Online: 2018-11-23 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/glot-2018-0005

Abstract

In physics, the spread of particles such as atoms is called diffusion. The same term is employed in linguistics to describe the spread of language features or languages as a whole. In this paper, we investigate how models for physical diffusion can be transferred to linguistics to study language spread. We review the different ways of describing physical diffusion and then look at two types of models to study language spread. By examining the differences and similarities between speakers, languages and atoms, we show that it is important to be clear about what is being modelled: languages or speakers, as these are quite different but cannot be completely separated—languages cannot exist without speakers and vice versa.

Keywords: diffusion; mathematical modelling; language spread; cellular automata; reaction-diffusion equations

References

  • Abrams, Daniel M. & Steven H. Strogatz. 2003. Linguistics: modelling the dynamics of language death. Nature 424(6951). 900–900.PubMedCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Altmann, Gabriel & Peter Meyer. 2005. Physicists look at language. In G. Altmann, V. Levickij & V. Perebejnos (eds.), Problemy quantitativnoj lingvistiki, 42–59. Černivci: RUTA.Google Scholar

  • Cooper, Robert L. 1982. A framework for the study of language spread. In Robert L. Cooper (ed.), Language spread: studies in diffusion and social change, 5–36. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar

  • Duchêne, Alexandre & Monica Heller. 2008. Discourses of endangerment: sociolinguistics, globalization and social order. In Alexandre Duchêne & Monica Heller (eds.), Discourses of endangerment: ideology and interest in the defence of languages, 1–13. London: Continuum.Google Scholar

  • Fritzsche, Albrecht. 2018. Spreading innovations: models, designs and research directions. In Armin Bunde, Jürgen Caro, Jörg Kärger & Gero Vogl (eds.), Diffusive spreading in nature, technology and society, Chapter 14. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar

  • Gal, Susan. 1996. Language shift. In Hans Goebl, Peter H. Nelde, Zdeněk Starý & Wolfgang Wölck (eds.), Kontaktlinguistik. An international handbook of the science of language and society, vol. 1, 586–593. Berlin/New York: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar

  • Heitjans, Paul & Jörg Kärger (eds.). 2005. Diffusion in condensed matter: methods, materials, models. Berlin: Springer Science & Business Media.Google Scholar

  • Kandler, Anne. 2009. Demography and language competition. Human Biology 81(2–3). 181–210.CrossrefPubMedWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Kandler, Anne & James Steele. 2008. Ecological models of language competition. Biological Theory 3(2). 164–173.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kandler, Anne & Roman Unger. 2018. Modelling language shift. In Armin Bunde, Jürgen Caro, Jörg Kärger & Gero Vogl (eds.), Diffusive spreading in nature, technology and society, Chapter 18. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar

  • Kandler, Anne, Roman Unger & James Steele. 2010. Language shift, bilingualism and the future of britain’s celtic languages. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences 365(1559). 3855–3864.Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Labov, William. 2006. The social stratification of English in New York City. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Labov, William. 2007. Transmission and diffusion. Language 83(2). 344–387.Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Lieberson, Stanley. 1966. Language questions in censuses. Sociological Inquiry 36(2). 262–279.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Mackey, William & Donald Cartwright. 1979. Geocoding language loss from census data. In William Mackey & Jacob Ornstein (eds.), Sociolinguistic studies in language contact: methods and cases, 69–96. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar

  • Mehrer, Helmut. 2007. Diffusion in solids. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar

  • Prochazka, Katharina & Gero Vogl. 2017. Quantifying the driving factors for language shift in a bilingual region. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 114(17). 4365–4369.Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Rogers, Everett M. 2003. Diffusion of innovations. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar

  • Schulze, Christian, Dietrich Stauffer & Søren Wichmann. 2007. Birth, survival and death of languages by Monte Carlo simulation. Communications in Computational Physics 3(2). 271–294.Google Scholar

  • Trudgill, Peter. 1974. Linguistic change and diffusion: description and explanation in sociolinguistic dialect geography. Language in Society 3(2). 215–246.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Walters, Caroline E. 2014. A reaction–diffusion model for competing languages. Meccanica 49(9). 2189–2206.Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

About the article

Published Online: 2018-11-23

Published in Print: 2018-11-27


Katharina Prochazka acknowledges funding from the University of Vienna (uni:docs fellowship).


Citation Information: Glottotheory, Volume 9, Issue 1, Pages 77–88, ISSN (Online) 2196-6907, ISSN (Print) 1337-7892, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/glot-2018-0005.

Export Citation

© 2018 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston.Get Permission

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in