Beck, J., Prazdny, K., & Ivry, R. (1984). The perception of transparency with achromatic colors. Perception & Psychophysics, 35(5), 407–422.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bergström, S. S. (1977). Common and relative components of reflected light as information about the illumination, colour, and three-dimensional form of objects. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 18(3), 180–186.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bloj, M. G., & Hurlbert, A. C. (2002). An empirical study of the traditional Mach card effect. Perception, 31(2), 233–246.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chen, L. (2005). The topological approach to perceptual organization. Visual Cognition, 12(4), 553–637.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cutting, J. E. (1986). Perception with an eye for motion. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Cutting, J. E., & Vishton, P. M. (1995). Perceiving layout and knowing distances: The integration, relative potency, and contextual use of different information about depth. In W. Epstein & S. Rogers (Eds.), Perception of space and motion (pp. 69–117). New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Da Pos, O., & Burigana, L. (2013). Qualitative inference rules for perceptual transparency. In L. Albertazzi (Ed.), Handbook of experimental phenomenology: Visual perception of shape, space and appearance (pp. 343–367). New York, NY: Wiley.Google Scholar
Dechter, R. (2003). Constraint processing. San Mateo, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.Google Scholar
Epstein, W. (1982). Percept-percept couplings. Perception, 11(1), 75–83.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gibson, J. J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Gilchrist, A. L. (2006). Seeing black and white. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gilchrist, A. L., Kossyfidis, C., Bonato, F., Agostini, T., Cataliotti, J., Li, X., Spehar, B., Annan, V., & Economou, E. (1999). An anchoring theory of lightness perception. Psychological Review, 106(4), 795–834.Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
Gogel, W. C. (1973). The organization of perceived space. I. Perceptual interactions. Psychologische Forschung, 36(3), 195–221.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gogel, W. C. (1976). An indirect method of measuring perceived distance from familiar size. Perception & Psychophysics, 20(6), 419–429.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hatfield, G. C. (2003). Representation and constraints: The inverse problem and the structure of visual space. Acta Psychologica, 114(3), 355–378.Google Scholar
Heidelberger, M. (2010). Functional relations and causality in Fechner and Mach. Philosophical Psychology, 23(2), 163–172.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hochberg, J. E. (1957). Effects of the Gestalt revolution: The Cornell symposium on perception. Psychological Review, 64(2), 73–84.Google Scholar
Jäkel, F., Singh, M., Wichmann, F. A., & Herzog, M. H. (2016). An overview of quantitative approaches in Gestalt perception. Vision Research, 126, 3–8.Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
Johansson, G. (1970). On theories for visual space perception. A letter to Gibson. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 11(2), 67–74.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kersten, D., Mamassian, P., & Yuille, A. L. (2004). Object perception as Bayesian inference. Annual Review of Psychology, 55, 271–304.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Koenderink, J. J., van Doorn, A. J., Pont, S., & Richards, W. (2008). Gestalt and phenomenal transparency. Journal of the Optical Society of America, Series A, 25(1), 190–202.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Koffka, K. (1935). Principles of Gestalt psychology. New York, NY: Harcourt, Brace and Company.Google Scholar
Kogo, N., Strecha, C., van Gool, L., & Wagemans, J. (2010). Surface construction by a 2-D differentiation-integration process: A neurocomputational model for perceived border ownership, depth, and lightness in Kanizsa figures. Psychological Review, 117(2), 406–439.Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
Köhler, W. (1913). Über unbemerkte Empfindungen und Urteilstäuschungen. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 66(Hefte 1 und 2), 51–80.Google Scholar
Marr, D. (1982). Vision. A computational investigation into the human representation and processing of visual information. San Francisco, CA: Freeman.Google Scholar
Metelli, F. (1970). An algebraic development of the theory of perceptual transparency. Ergonomics, 13(1), 59–66.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Neapolitan, R. E. (2004). Learning Bayesian networks. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Oyama, T. (1969). S-S relations in psychophysics and R-R correlations in phenomenology. Psychologia, 12(1), 17–23.Google Scholar
Poggio, T., Torre, V., & Koch, C. (1985). Computational vision and regularization theory. Nature, 317(No. 6035), 314–319.Google Scholar
Rock, I. (1983). The logic of perception. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Rock, I. (1997). Indirect perception. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Sarris, V. (2006). Relational psychophysics in humans and animals: A comparative developmental approach. London, UK: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Sarris, V. (2012). Epilogue: Max Wertheimer in Frankfurt and thereafter. In L. Spillmann (Ed.), On perceived motion and figural organization (pp. 253–265). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Savardi, U., & Bianchi, I. (2012). Coupling Epstein’s and Bozzi’s “percept-percept coupling”. Gestalt Theory, 34(2), 191–200.Google Scholar
Sinico, M. (2013). Epistemic line of explanation for experimental phenomenology. Gestalt Theory, 35(4), 365–376.Google Scholar
Spillmann, L. (2012). The current status of Gestalt rules in perceptual research: Psychophysics and neurophysiology. In L. Spillmann (Ed.), On perceived motion and figural organization (pp. 191–251). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Todd, J. T., Chen, L., & Norman, J. F. (1998). On the relative salience of Euclidean, affine, and topological structure for 3-D form discrimination. Perception, 27(3), 273–282.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Trommershäuser, J., Körding, K. P., & Landy, M. S. (Eds.). (2011). Sensory cue integration. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wagemans, J., Elder, J. H., Kubovy, M., Palmer, S. E., Peterson, M. A., Singh, M., & von der Heydt, R. (2012a). A century of Gestalt psychology in visual perception: I. Perceptual grouping and figure-ground organization. Psychological Bulletin, 138(6), 1172–1217.Google Scholar
Wagemans, J., Feldman, J., Gepshtein, S., Kimchi, R., Pomerantz, J. R., van der Helm, P. A., & van Leeuwen, C. (2012b). A century of Gestalt psychology in visual perception: II. Conceptual and theoretical foundations. Psychological Bulletin, 138(6), 1218–1252.Google Scholar
Comments (0)