Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Gestalt Theory

An International Multidisciplinary Journal

3 Issues per year

Open Access
See all formats and pricing
More options …

The Pain of Granting Otherness: Interoception and the Differentiation of the Other / Der Schmerz der Gewährung von Andersheit: Interozeption und die Differenzierung des Objekts

Joona Taipale
Published Online: 2017-12-21 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/gth-2017-0013


This article examines the foundations of social experience from a psychoanalytic perspective. In current developmental psychology, social cognition debate, and phenomenology of empathy, it is widely assumed that the self and the other are differentiated from the outset, and the basic challenge is accordingly taken to consist in explaining how the gap between the self and the other can be bridged. By contrast, in the psychoanalytic tradition, the central task is considered to lie in explaining how such a gap is established in the first place. My article develops this latter idea. I focus on the infant’s early experience of care, show how the presence of the caregiver can be interpreted in terms of an interoceptive experience, illustrate the gradual self/other differentiation from this perspective, and thus argue that the other is granted ‘otherness’ gradually. By emphasising this graduality, I challenge the assumption that self/other differentiation dominates the infant’s life from the outset. In this manner, I show how the psychoanalytic theory may be used in contesting one of the cornerstones of the current research paradigm.

Keywords : Care; differentiation; experience; infants; interoceptive bias; psychoanalysis; development; self; other


  • Ainley, V., Tajadura-Jiménez, A., Fotopoulou, A., & Tsakiris, M. (2012). Looking into myself: The effect of self-focused attention on interoceptive sensitivity. Psychophysiology, 49(11), 1504-1508.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bergmann, M. (1963). The place of Paul Federn’s ego psychology in psychoanalytic metapsychology. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 11, 97-116.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Blum, H. (1982). Theories of the self and psychoanalytic concepts: Discussion. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 30(4), 959-978.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Craig, B. (2002). How do you feel? Interoception: The sense of the physiological condition of the body. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 3, 655-666.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Craig, B. (2003). Interoception: The sense of the physiological condition of the body. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 13, 500-505.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Dondi, M., Simion, F., & Caltran, G. (1999). Can newborns discriminate between their own cry and the cry of another newborn infant? Developmental Psychology, 35(2), 418-426.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Farroni, T., Johnson, M., & Csibra, G. (2004). Mechanisms of eye gaze perception during infancy. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 16(8), 1320-1326.Google Scholar

  • Field, J. (1976). Relation of young infant’s reaching behavior to stimulus distance and solidity. Developmental Psychology, 12, 444-448.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Freud, S. (1923). Das Ich und das Es (Gesammelte Werke, Vol. 13, pp. 237-289). London, England: Imago Publishing.Google Scholar

  • Freud, S. (1930). Das Unbehagen in der Kultur (Gesammelte Werke, Vol. 14, pp. 421-506). London, England: Imago Publishing.Google Scholar

  • Freud, S. (1964). An outline of psycho-analysis and other works. In J. Strachey (Ed.), The standard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud (Vol. 23, pp. 141-196). London, England: The Hogarth Press and the Institute of Psychoanalysis.Google Scholar

  • Freud, S. (1974). Totem und Tabu. Einige Übereinstimmungen im Seelenleben der Wilden und der Neurotiker. In A. Mitscherlich (Ed.), Fragen der Gesellschaft. Ursprünge der Religion (Studienausgabe, IX) (pp. 287-444). Frankfurt am Main, Germany: S. Fischer.Google Scholar

  • Hägglund, S. (2014). The body as thought and reality. The Scandinavian Psychoanalytic Review, 37(2), 107-112.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hobson, P. (1999). Beyond cognition. A theory of autism. In P. Lloyd & C. Fernyhough (Eds.), Lev Vygotsky: Critical assessments (pp. 253-281). London, England: Routledge.Google Scholar

  • Hobson, P. (2008). Interpersonally situated cognition. International Journal of Philosophical Studies, 16(3), 377-397.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kohut, H. (1971). The analysis of the self. A systematic approach to the psychoanalytic treatment of narcissistic personality disorder. Chicago, MI & London, England: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

  • Kohut, H. (1977). The restoration of the self. Chicago, MI & London, England: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

  • Kohut, H. (2011). Four Basic Concepts in Self Psychology. In P. Ornstein (Ed.), The search for the self. Selected writings of Heinz Kohut: 1978-1981 (Vol. 4) (pp. 447-470). London, England: Karnac Books.Google Scholar

  • Mahler, M., Pine, F., & Bergman, A. (1975). The psychological birth of the human infant. New York, NY: Basic Books.Google Scholar

  • Merleau-Ponty, M. (2002). Phenomenology of perception. (C. Smith, Trans.). London, England/New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar

  • Merleau-Ponty, M. (2010). Child psychology and pedagogy. The Sorbonne lectures 1949-1952. (T. Welsh, Trans.). Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar

  • Nagy, E. (2008). Innate intersubjectivity: Newborns’ sensitivity to communication disturbance. Developmental Psychology, 44(6), 1779-1784.Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Reddy, V. (2008). How infants know minds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

  • Rochat, P. (2004). Emerging co-awareness. In G. Bremner & A. Slater (Eds.), Theories of infant development (pp. 258-283). Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar

  • Rochat, P, Goubet, N., & Senders, S. (1999). To reach or not to reach? Perception of body effectivities by young infants. Infant and Child Development, 8, 129-148.Google Scholar

  • Sandler, J. (1987). The concept of projective identification. In J. Sandler (Ed.), Projection, identification, projective identification (pp. 13-26). London, England: Karnac Books.Google Scholar

  • Spitz, R. (1955). The primal cavity. A contribution to the genesis of perception and its role for psychoanalytic theory. The Psychoanalytic Study of the Child, 10, 215-240.Google Scholar

  • Spitz, R. (1965). The first year of life. A psychoanalytic study of normal and deviant development of object-relations. New York, NY: International Universities Press.Google Scholar

  • Stern, D. (1983). The early development of schemas of self, other, and ‘self with other’. In J. Lichtenberg & S. Kaplan (Eds.), Reflections on self psychology (pp. 49-84). Hillsdale, NJ: The Analytic Press.Google Scholar

  • Stern, D. (1985). The interpersonal world of the infant. A view from psychoanalysis and developmental psychology. New York, NY: Basic Books.Google Scholar

  • Stern, D. (2002). The first relationship. Infant and mother. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

  • Tähkä, V. (1993). Mind and its treatment. A psychoanalytic approach. Madison, WI: International Universities Press.Google Scholar

  • Taipale, J. (2013). Facts and fantasies. Embodiment and the early formation of selfhood. In R. Jensen & D. Moran (Eds.), The phenomenology of embodied subjectivity (pp. 241-262). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.Google Scholar

  • Taipale, J. (2014a). The bodily feeling of existence in phenomenology and psychoanalysis. In S. Heinämaa, M. Hartimo, & T. Miettinen (Eds.), Phenomenology and the transcendental (pp. 218-234). New York, NY: RoutledgeGoogle Scholar

  • Taipale, J. (2014b). Phenomenology and embodiment. Husserl and the constitution of subjectivity. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar

  • Taipale, J. (2015). ‘Similarity and asymmetry. Husserl and the transcendental foundations of empathy’. Phänomenologische Forschungen, 2014(2015), 141-154.Google Scholar

  • Taipale, J. (2016a). ‘Self-regulation and beyond. Affect regulation and the infant-caregiver dyad’. Frontiers in Psychology, Frontiers in Psychology, 7(889), 1-13. doi:CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Taipale, J. (2016b). Social mirrors. Tove Jansson’s Invisible Child and the importance of being seen. Scandinavian Psychoanalytic Review, 39(1), 13-25.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Tajadura-Jiménez, A., & Tsakiris, M. (2014). Balancing the ‘inner’ and the ‘outer’ self: Interoceptive sensitivity modulates self-other boundaries. Journal of Experimental Psychology- General, 143(2), 736-744.Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Winnicott, D. (1964). The child, the family, and the outside world. London, England: Penguin Books.Google Scholar

  • Winnicott, D. (1965a). The family and individual development. London, England: Routledge.Google Scholar

  • Winnicott, D. (1965b). The maturational processes and the facilitating environment. New York, NY: International Universities Press.Google Scholar

  • Winnicott, D. (1971). Playing and reality. London, England and New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar

  • Winnicott, D. (1984). Through pediatrics to psychoanalysis. Collected papers. London, England: Karnac Books.Google Scholar

  • Winnicott, D. (1986). Home is where we start from. Essays by a psychoanalyst. C. Winnicott, R. Shepherd & M. Davis (Eds.), London, England: Penguin Books.Google Scholar

  • Wolff, P. (1966). The causes, controls, and organization of behavior in the neonate. Psychological Issues, 5(1), 1-105.Google Scholar

About the article

Published Online: 2017-12-21

Published in Print: 2017-11-27

Citation Information: Gestalt Theory, Volume 39, Issue 2-3, Pages 155–173, ISSN (Online) 2519-5808, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/gth-2017-0013.

Export Citation

© 2017. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License. BY-NC-ND 4.0

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in