Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Hacquetia

The Journal of Slovenian Academy of Sciences and Arts, Scientific Research Centre, Institute of Biology

2 Issues per year


CiteScore 2016: 1.11

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2016: 0.446
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2016: 0.603

Open Access
Online
ISSN
1854-9829
See all formats and pricing
More options …

Effect of Management Modification on the Coenological Composition of the North Adriatic Pastoral Landscape (Ćićarija, Croatia)

Ivana Kosić
  • Department of Agricultural Botany, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Zagreb, Svetošimunska 25, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
/ Federico Tardella
  • School of Environmental Sciences, University of Camerino, via Pontoni 5, I-62032 Camerino (MC), Italy
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
/ Andrea Catorci
  • School of Environmental Sciences, University of Camerino, via Pontoni 5, I-62032 Camerino (MC), Italy
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
Published Online: 2012-05-21 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/v10028-012-0002-5

Effect of Management Modification on the Coenological Composition of the North Adriatic Pastoral Landscape (Ćićarija, Croatia)

The research aim was to assess the dynamics of the North Adriatic pastoral landscape (Ćićarija, Croatia) with regard to the coenological composition of grassland communities, and, more specifically, to: i) assess the current grassland mosaic from a coenological viewpoint; ii) assess the effects of management abandonment on grassland species composition, also taking into account, as a basis for comparison, data on pastoral communities collected in the past decades. To achieve the research aims, 73 phytosociological relevés were carried out; for each of them field data (altitude, aspect, slope, landform) and information on grassland management were collected. Multivariate analysis of phytosociological relevés led to the identification of four vegetation types (Danthonio-Scorzoneretum villosae, Carici humilis-Centaureetum rupestris, Brachypodium rupestre-dominated stands, and Anthoxantho-Brometum erecti), which were linked to landform and to grassland management. Comparison in terms of social behaviour type composition of the grassland communities surveyed in the present study with the ones surveyed in the past decades, highlighted that the current management (grassland abandonment, as well as low intensity grazing and not periodic mowing) is leading to a percentage loss of pasture and meadow characteristic species, in favour of successional and ruderal ones.

Namen raziskave je bil ovrednotiti dinamiko severnojadranske pašniške krajine (Čićarija, Hrvaška) predvsem cenološke sestavo travniških združb. Posebej smo želeli ugotoviti: i) trenuten travniški mozaik s cenološkega vidika, ii) spremembe opuščanja gospodarjenja na vrstno sestavo travnikov s primerjavo podatkov o pašnikih, pridobljenih v preteklih desetletjih. Naredili smo 73 fitocenoloških popisov in za vsakega od njih smo pridobili podatke o višini, legi, nagibu, krajinski obliki in informacijo o gospodarjenju. Z multivariatnimi analizami smo ugotovili štiri vegetacijske tipe (Danthonio-Scorzoneretum villosae, Carici humilis-Centaureetum rupestris, združbo z dominantno vrsto Brachypodium rupestre in Anthoxantho-Brometum erecti), ki smo jih povezali s krajinsko obliko in načinom gospodarjenja. Primerjava sestave zgradbe travniških združb glede na sinsociološko pripadnost vrst med današnjimi in starejšimi popisi je pokazala, da trenuten način gospodarjenja (opuščanje gospodarjenja, nizka intenziteta paše in le občasna košnja) vodi v izgubo značilnih vrst pašnikov in travnikov na račun vrst razvitejših sukcesijskih stadijev in vrst ruderalnih rastišč.

Keywords: grasslands; North Adriatic; management; phytosociology; social behaviour type

Keywords: travniki; severni Jadran; gospodarjenje; fitocenologija; fitosociološka pripadnost vrst

  • Adler, P., Raff, R. & Lauenroth, W. K. 2001: The effect of grazing on the spatial heterogeneity of vegetation. Oecologia 128: 465-479.Google Scholar

  • Aeschimann, D., Lauber, K., Moser, D. M. & Theurillat, J. P. 2004: Flora alpina. 1-3. Zanichelli, Bologna, 2670 pp.Google Scholar

  • Alard, D. & Poudevigne, I. 2000: Diversity patterns in grasslands along a landscape gradient in northwestern France. Journal of Vegetation Science 11: 287-294.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Altesor, A., Pinero, G., Lezama, F., Jackson, R. B., Sarasola, M. & Paruelo, J. M. 2006: Ecosystem changes associated with grazing in subhumid South American grassland. Journal of Vegetation Science 17: 323-332.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bartha, S., Merolli, A., Campetella, G. & Canullo, R. 2008: Changes of vascular plant diversity along a chronosequence of beech coppice stands, central Apennines, Italy. Plant Biosystems 142: 572-583.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bakker, J. P. 1998: The impact of grazing on plant communities. In: Wallis De Vries, M. F., Bakker, J. P., van Wieren, S. E. (eds.): Grazing and Conservation Management. Conservation Biology Series. Kluver Academic Publishers, pp. 137-184.Google Scholar

  • Bennie, J., Hill, M. O., Barter, R. & Huntley, B. 2006: Influence of slope and aspect on long-term vegetation change in British chalk grasslands. Journal of Ecology 94: 355-368.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Benton, T. G., Vickery, J. A. & Wilson, J. D. 2003: Farmland biodiversity: is habitat heterogeneity the key? Trends in Ecology and Evolution 18: 182-188.Google Scholar

  • Biondi, E., Allegrezza, M. & Zuccarello, V. 2005: Syntaxonomic revision of the Apennine grassland belonging to Brometalia erecti and an analysis of their relationship with the xerophilous vegetation of Rosmarinetea officinalis. Phytocoenologia 35(1): 129-163.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Biondi, E., Čarni, A., Vagge, I., Taffetani, F. & Ballelli, S. 2001: The vegetation of the Trifolio medii-Geranietea sanguinei Müller 1962 class in the central part of the Apennines (Italy and San Marino). Fitosociologia 38(1): 55-65.Google Scholar

  • Biondini, M. E., Patton, B. D. & Nyren, P. E. 1998: Grazing intensity and ecosystem processes in a northern mixed-grass prairie, USA. Ecological Applications 8(2): 469-479.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bobbink, R. & Willems, J. H. 1987: Increasing dominance of B. pinnatum (L.) Beauv. in chalk grasslands: a threat to a species-rich ecosystem. Biological Conservation 40: 301-314.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bonanomi, G. & Allegrezza, M. 2004: Effetti della colonizzazione di Brachypodium rupestre (Host) Roemer et Schultes sulla diversità di alcune fitocenosi erbacee dell'Appennino centrale. Fitosociologia 41(2): 51-69.Google Scholar

  • Borhidi, A. 1995: Social behaviour types, the naturalness and relative ecological indicator values of the higher plants in the Hungarian flora. Acta Botanica Hungarica 39: 97-181.Google Scholar

  • Braun-Blanquet, J. 1964: Pflanzensoziologie. Grundzüge der vegetationskunde. 3. Aufl. Sprin ger Ver., Wien-New York, pp. 865.Google Scholar

  • Buckland, S. M., Thompson, K., Hodgson, J. G. & Grime, J. P. 2001: Grassland invasions: effects of manipulations of climate and management. Journal of Applied Ecology 38: 289-294.Google Scholar

  • Bullock, J. M., Franklin, J., Stevenson, M. J., Silvertown, J., Coulson, S. J., Gregory, S. J. & Tofts, R. 2001: A plant trait analysis of responses to grazing in a long-term experiment. Journal of Applied Ecology 38: 253-267.Google Scholar

  • Campetella, G., Canullo, R. & Bartha, S. 2004: Coenostate descriptors and spatial dependence in vegetation: Derived variables in monitoring forest dynamics and assembly rules. Community Ecology 5: 105-114.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Čarni, A. 2003: Vegetation of forest edges in the central part of Istria (Istria, northwestern Croatia). Natura Croatica 12(3): 131-140.Google Scholar

  • Čarni, A., Franjić, J., Šilc U. & Škvorc, Ž. 2005: Floristical, ecological and structural diversity of vegetation of forest fringes of Northern Croatia along a climatic gradient. Phyton 45(2): 287-303.Google Scholar

  • Catorci, A. & Gatti, R. 2010: Floristic composition and spatial distribution assessment of montane mesophilous grasslands in the central Apennines, Italy: a multi-scale and diachronic approach. Plant Biosystems 144(4): 793-804.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Catorci, A., Ottaviani, G., Ballelli S., & Cesaretti, S. 2011b: Functional differentiation of Central Apennine grasslands under mowing and grazing disturbance regimes. Polish Journal of Ecology 59(1): 115-128.Google Scholar

  • Catorci, A., Ottaviani, G. & Cesaretti, S. 2011a: Functional and coenological changes under different long-term management conditions in Apennine meadows (central Italy). Phytocoenologia 41(1): 45-58.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Collins, S. L., Knapp, A. K., Briggs, J. M., Blairs, J. M. & Steinauer, E. M. 1998: Modulation of diversity by grazing and mowing in native tallgrass prairie. Science 280: 745-747.CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar

  • de Bello, F., Lepš, J., Sebastià, M. T. 2006: Variations in species and functional plant diversity along climatic and grazing gradients. Ecography 29: 801-810.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • de Bello, F., Lepš, J., Sebastià, M. T. 2007: Grazing effect on species and functional diversity along a climatic gradient. Journal of Vegetation Science 18: 25-34.Google Scholar

  • Decocq, G., Aubert, M., Dupont, F., Alard, D., Saguez, R., Wattez-Franger, A., De Foucault, B., Delelis-Dusollier, A. & Bardat, J. 2004: Plant diversity in a managed temperate deciduous forest: understorey response to two silvicultural systems. Journal of Applied Ecology 41: 1065-1079.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Díaz, S. & Cabido, M. 1997: Plant functional types and ecosystem function in relation to global changes. Journal of Vegetation Science 8: 463-474.Google Scholar

  • Díaz, S., Lavorel, S., McIntyre, S., Falczuk, V., Casanoves, S., Milchunas, D. G., Skarpe, C., Rusch, G., Sternberg, M., Noy-Meir, I., Landsberg, J., Zhang, W., Clark, H. & Campbell, B. D. 2007: Plant traits responses to grazing - a global synthesis. Global Change Biology 13: 313-341.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Dullinger, S., Dirnböck, T. & Grabherr, G. 2003: Pattern of shrub invasion into high mountain grasslands of the Northern calcareous Alps, Austria. Arctic, Antarctic, and Alpine Research 35(4): 434-441.Google Scholar

  • During, H. J. & Willems, J. H. 1984: Diversity models as applied to a chalk grassland. Vegetatio 57: 103-114.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Frank, D. A. 2005: The interactive effects of grazing ungulates and aboveground production on grassland diversity. Oecologia 143: 629-634.CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar

  • Hirst, R. A., Pywell, R. F., Marrs, R. H. & Putwain, P. D. 2005: The resilience of calcareous and mesotrophic grasslands following disturbance. Journal of Applied Ecology 42: 498-506.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hobbs, R. J. 1997: Can we use plant functional types to describe and predict responses to environmental change? In: Smith, T. A., Shugard, H. H. & Woodward, F. I. (eds.): Plant Functional Types. Their Relevance to Ecosystem Properties and Global Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 66-90.Google Scholar

  • Holling, C. S. (ed.) (1978). Adaptive Environmental Assessment and Management. Chichester, Wiley, pp. 377.Google Scholar

  • Hunt, R., Hodgson, J. G., Thompson, K., Bungener, P., Dunnett, N. P. & Askew, A. P. 2004: A new practical tool for deriving a functional signature for herbaceous vegetation. Applied Vegetation Science 7: 163-170.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kahmen, S., Poschlod, P. & Schreiber, K. 2002: Conservation management of calcareous grasslands. Changes in plant species composition and response of functional traits during 25 years. Biological Conservation 104: 319-328.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kaligarič, M. 1997: Rastlinstvo primorskega krasa in Slovenske Istre - Travniki in pašniki. Zgodovinsko društvo za južno primorsko. Znanstveno raziskovalno središče Republike Slovenije Koper, Koper, 111 pp.Google Scholar

  • Kaligarič, M., Culiberg, M. & Kramberger, B. 2006: Recent vegetation history of the North Adriatic grasslands: expansion and decay of an anthropogenic habitat. Folia Geobotanica 41: 241-258.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kaligarič, M. & Poldini, L. 1997: Nuovi contributi per una tipologia fitosociologica delle praterie magre (Scorzoneretalia villosae H-ić 1975) del Carso nordadriatico. Gortania 19: 119-148.Google Scholar

  • Kelly, C. K. 1996: Identifying plant functional types using floristic data bases: ecological correlates of plant size. Journal of Vegetation Science 7: 417-424.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kleyer, M. 1999: The distribution of plant functional types on gradients of disturbance intensity and resource supply in an agricultural landscape. Journal of Vegetation Science 10: 697-708.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Klimek, S., Richter gen. Kemmermann, A., Hofmann, M. & Isselstein, J. 2006: Plant species richness and composition in managed grasslands: The relative importance of field management and environmental factors. Biological Conservation 134: 559-570.Google Scholar

  • Kolasa, J. & Rollo, C. D. 1991: Introduction: the heterogeneity of heterogeneity, a glossary. In: Kolasa, J. & Pickett, S. T. A. (eds.): Ecological Heterogeneity. Springer, New-York, pp. 1-23.Google Scholar

  • Lavorel, S., McIntyre, S., Landsberg, J. & Forbes, T. D. A. 1997: Plant functional classifications: from general groups to specific groups based on response to disturbance. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 12: 474-478.Google Scholar

  • Luick, R. 1998: Ecological and socio-economic implications of livestock-keeping systems on extensive grasslands in south-western Germany. Journal of Applied Ecology 35: 979-982.Google Scholar

  • MacDonald, D., Crabtree, J. R., Wiesinger, G., Dax, T., Stamou, N., Fleury, P., Lazpita, J. G. & Gibon, A. 2000: Agricultural abandonment in mountain areas of Europe: environmental consequences and policy response. Journal of Environmental Management 59: 47-69.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • McIntyre, S., Díaz, S., Lavorel, S. & Cramer, W. 1999: Plant functional types and disturbance dynamics - Introduction. Journal of Vegetation Science 10: 604-608.Google Scholar

  • Milchunas, D. G. & Lauenroth, W. K. 1993: Quantitative effects of grazing on vegetation and soils over a global range of environments. Ecological Monographs 63: 327-366.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Mucina, H. L., Grabherr, G. & Ellmauer, T. 1993: Die Pflanzengesellschaften Österreichs. Teil I. Anthropogene Vegetation - Gustav Fisher, 578 pp.Google Scholar

  • Myklestad, Å. & Sætersdal, M. 2004: The importance of traditional meadow management techniques for conservation of vascular plant species richness in Norway. Biological Conservation 118: 133-139.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Nikolić, T. (ed.) 2011: Flora Croatica Database, (URL http://hirc.botanic.hr/fcd

  • Noble, I. & Gitay, H. 1996: A functional classification for predicting the dynamics of landscapes. Journal of Vegetation Science 7: 329-336.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Norderhaug, A., Ihse, M. & Pedersen, O. 2000: Biotope patterns and abundance of meadow plant species in a Norwegian rural landscape. Landscape Ecology 15: 201-218.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Orloci, L. 1978: Multivariate analysis in vegetation research. W. Junk, The Hague, 481 pp.Google Scholar

  • Pärtel, M., Mändla, R. & Zobel, M. 1999: Landscape history of a calcareous (alvar) grassland in Hanila, western Estonia during the last three hundred years. Landscape Ecology 14: 187-196.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Pignatti, S. 1982: Flora d'Italia. I-III - Edagricole, Bologna, 2302 pp.Google Scholar

  • Pillar, V. D. 1999: On the identification of optimal plant functional types. Journal of Vegetation Science 10: 631-640.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Podani, J. 2001: Syn-tax 2000 computer program for data analysis in ecology and systematics. Budapest.Google Scholar

  • Poldini, L. 1980: Übersicht über die Vegetation des Karstes von Triest und Görz (NO-Italien). Studia Geobotanica 1(1): 79-130.Google Scholar

  • Poldini, L. 1985: Note ai margini della vegetazione carsica. Studia Geobotanica 5: 39-48.Google Scholar

  • Poldini, L. 1989: La vegetazione del Carso isontino e triestino. Studio del paesaggio vegetale tra Trieste, Gorizia e i territori adiacenti. Edizioni Lint Trieste, 315 pp.Google Scholar

  • Poldini, L. & Oriolo, G. 1994. La vegetazione dei prati da sfalcio e dei pascoli intensivi (Arrhenatheretalia e Poo-Trisetetalia) in Friuli (NE Italia). Studia Geobotanica 14, suppl. 1: 3-48.Google Scholar

  • Poschlod, P. & Wallis De Vries, M. F. 2002: The historical and socioeconomic prospective of calcareous grasslands-lessons from the distant and recent past. Biological Conservation 104: 361-376.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Robinson, R. A. & Sutherland, W. J. 2002: Postwar changes in arable farming and biodiversity in Great Britain. Journal of Applied Ecology 39: 157-176.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Scheiner, S. M. 1992: Measuring pattern diversity. Ecology 73(5): 1860-1867.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Sebastià, M. T., de Bello, F., Puig, L. & Taull, M. 2008: Grazing as a factor structuring grasslands in the Pyrenees. Applied Vegetation Science 11: 215-222.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Tscharntke, T., Klein, A. M., Kruess, A., Steffan-Dewenter, I. & Thies, C. 2005: Landscape perspectives on agricultural intensification and biodiversity - ecosystem service management. Ecology Letters 8(8): 857-874.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • van der Maarel, E. 1979: Trasformation of cover-abundance values in phytosociology and its effects on community similarity. Vegetatio 39: 97-144.Google Scholar

  • van Dijk, G. 1991: Half-natuurlijke graslanden in Europa verdwijnen. Natuur en Milieu 15(9): 8-13.Google Scholar

  • Vitanzi, A., Paura, B. & Catorci, A. 2009: Forest syntaxa spatial distribution hierarchical modelling: preliminary assessment of a Central Apennine (Italy) landscape. Sauteria 18: 311-322.Google Scholar

  • Vitasović Kosić, I. 2011: Grasslands Scorzonero-Chrysopogonetalia order on the Ćićarija: Flora, Vegetation and Feed value. Dissertation (PhD), University of Zagreb, Faculty of Agriculture, pp. 1-247.Google Scholar

  • Vitasović Kosić, I., Tardella F. M., Ruščić M. & Catorci, A. 2011: Assessment of floristic diversity, functional composition and management strategy of North Adriatic pastoral landscape (Croatia). Polish Journal of Ecology 59(4): 765-776.Google Scholar

  • Willems, J. H. 1990: Calcareous grasslands in Continental Europe. In: Hillier, S. H., Walton, D. W. H. & Wells D. A. (eds.): Calcareous grasslands: ecology and management. Bluntisham Books, Bluntingham, pp. 3-10.Google Scholar

  • Wilson, E. J., Wells, T. C. E. & Sparks, T. H. 1995: Are calcareous grasslands in the UK under threat from nitrogen deposition? An experimental determination of a critical load. Journal of Ecology 83: 823-832.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Wilson, W. L., Abernethy, V. J., Murphy, K. J., Adam, A., McCracken, D. I., Downie, I. S., Foster, G. N., Furness, R. W., Waterhouse, A. & Ribera, I. 2003: Prediction of plant diversity response to land-use change on Scottish agricultural land. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 94: 249-263.Google Scholar

  • Zervas, G. 1998: Quantifying and optimizing grazing regimes in Greek mountain systems. Journal of Applied Ecology 35: 983-986.Google Scholar

About the article


Published Online: 2012-05-21

Published in Print: 2012-01-01


Citation Information: Hacquetia, ISSN (Online) 1854-9829, ISSN (Print) 1581-4661, DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/v10028-012-0002-5.

Export Citation

This content is open access.

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in