Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …
Wood Research and Technology

Holzforschung

Cellulose – Hemicelluloses – Lignin – Wood Extractives

Editor-in-Chief: Faix, Oskar / Salmén, Lennart

Editorial Board: Daniel, Geoffrey / Militz, Holger / Rosenau, Thomas / Sixta, Herbert / Vuorinen, Tapani / Argyropoulos, Dimitris S. / Balakshin, Yu / Barnett, J. R. / Burgert, Ingo / Rio, Jose C. / Evans, Robert / Evtuguin, Dmitry V. / Frazier, Charles E. / Fukushima, Kazuhiko / Gindl-Altmutter, Wolfgang / Glasser, W. G. / Holmbom, Bjarne / Isogai, Akira / Kadla, John F. / Koch, Gerald / Lachenal, Dominique / Laine, Christiane / Mansfield, Shawn D. / Morrell, J.J. / Niemz, Peter / Potthast, Antje / Ragauskas, Arthur J. / Ralph, John / Rice, Robert W. / Salin, Jarl-Gunnar / Schmitt, Uwe / Schultz, Tor P. / Sipilä, Jussi / Takano, Toshiyuki / Tamminen, Tarja / Theliander, Hans / Welling, Johannes / Willför, Stefan / Yoshihara, Hiroshi

12 Issues per year


IMPACT FACTOR 2017: 2.079

CiteScore 2017: 1.94

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2017: 0.709
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2017: 0.979

Online
ISSN
1437-434X
See all formats and pricing
More options …
Volume 70, Issue 6

Issues

Hydrophobisation of wood surfaces by combining liquid flame spray (LFS) and plasma treatment: dynamic wetting properties

Maziar Sedighi Moghaddam
  • Corresponding author
  • SP Technical Research Institute of Sweden, Chemistry, Materials and Surfaces, Box 5607, SE-114 86 Stockholm, Sweden
  • KTH Royal Institute of Technology, School of Architecture and the Built Environment, Department of Civil and Architectural Engineering, Building Materials, SE-100 44 Stockholm, Sweden
  • Email
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
/ Golrokh Heydari
  • KTH Royal Institute of Technology, School of Chemical Science and Engineering, Department of Chemistry, Surface and Corrosion Science, SE-100 44 Stockholm, Sweden
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
/ Mikko Tuominen
  • SP Technical Research Institute of Sweden, Chemistry, Materials and Surfaces, Box 5607, SE-114 86 Stockholm, Sweden
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
/ Matthew Fielden
  • KTH Royal Institute of Technology, School of Engineering Sciences, Department of Applied Physics, Nanostructure Physics, SE-106 91 Stockholm, Sweden
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
/ Janne Haapanen
  • Aerosol Physics Laboratory, Department of Physics, TUT Tampere University of Technology, P.O. Box 692, 33101 Tampere, Finland
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
/ Jyrki M. Mäkelä
  • Aerosol Physics Laboratory, Department of Physics, TUT Tampere University of Technology, P.O. Box 692, 33101 Tampere, Finland
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
/ Magnus E.P. Wålinder
  • KTH Royal Institute of Technology, School of Architecture and the Built Environment, Department of Civil and Architectural Engineering, Building Materials, SE-100 44 Stockholm, Sweden
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
/ Per M. Claesson
  • KTH Royal Institute of Technology, School of Chemical Science and Engineering, Department of Chemistry, Surface and Corrosion Science, SE-100 44 Stockholm, Sweden
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
/ Agne Swerin
  • SP Technical Research Institute of Sweden, Chemistry, Materials and Surfaces, Box 5607, SE-114 86 Stockholm, Sweden
  • KTH Royal Institute of Technology, School of Chemical Science and Engineering, Department of Chemistry, Surface and Corrosion Science, SE-100 44 Stockholm, Sweden
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
Published Online: 2015-11-17 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/hf-2015-0148

Abstract

The hydrophilic nature of wood surfaces is a major cause for water uptake and subsequent biological degradation and dimensional changes. In the present paper, a thin transparent superhydrophobic layer on pine veneer surfaces has been created for controlling surface wettability and water repellency. This effect was achieved by means of the liquid flame spray (LFS) technique, in the course of which the nanoparticulate titanium dioxide (TiO2) was brought to the surface, followed by plasma polymerisation. Plasma polymerised perfluorohexane (PFH) or hexamethyldisiloxane (HMDSO) were then deposited onto the LFS-treated wood surfaces. The same treatment systems were applied to silicon wafers so as to have well-defined reference surfaces. The dynamic wettability was studied by the multicycle Wilhelmy plate (mWP) method, resulting in advancing and receding contact angles as well as sorption behavior of the samples during repeated wetting cycles in water. Atomic force microscopy (AFM) and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) were employed to characterise the topography and surface chemical compositions and to elucidate the question how the morphology of the nanoparticles and plasma affect the wetting behavior. A multi-scale roughness (micro-nano roughness) was found and this enhanced the forced wetting durability via a superhydrophobic effect on the surface, which was stable even after repeated wetting cycles. The hydrophobic effect of this approach was higher compared to that of plasma modified surfaces with their micro-scale modification.

This article offers supplementary material which is provided at the end of the article.

Keywords: cold plasma; contact angle (CA); dynamic wetting; hexamethyldisiloxane (HMDSO); hydrophobisation; liquid flame spray (LFS); multi-scale roughness; nano-sized metal oxide (TiO2); perfluorohexane (PFH); plasma polymerisation; superhydrophobicity; Wilhelmy plate method; wood

Introduction

Wood has a hydrophilic nature, and the resulting moisture sorption in outdoor applications leads to biological degradation (Rowell 2012). A hydrophobic protective coating on the surface is one of the approaches to reduce water up-take (Zanini et al. 2008), which entails an improved decay resistance and better dimensional stability (Podgorski et al. 2000, 2002; Mahltig et al. 2008; Manolache et al. 2008; Wang et al. 2011a; Poaty et al. 2013). Both impregnation of wood (Rowell 1982) and coating with varnish and paint (Probst et al. 1997) are the most common wood-protecting techniques. In both cases, the natural colour of the wood is changing as a side effect.

Superhydrophobic surfaces not only show water repellency but also antifouling and self-cleaning effects (Callies and Quere 2005; Ma and Hill 2006; Hsieh et al. 2008; Cao et al. 2009; Banerjee et al. 2011). The superhydrophobicity can be achieved by lowering the surface energy and modifying the surface roughness. The fabrication of multi-scale hierarchical surface structures in the micro- and nano-scale also can enhance the hydrophobicity (Wang et al. 2011a). Topographies in combination with sub-micron and nano-scale roughness are more water repellent than a micro-scale structure alone (Teisala et al. 2012).

Hydrophobic wood surfaces can be created by different techniques such as the sol-gel method (Wang et al. 2011a,b; Gholamiyan et al. 2016), plasma etching and polymerisation (Denes et al. 1999; Denes and Young 1999; Podgorski et al. 2002; Bente et al. 2004; Avramidis et al. 2009; Levasseur et al. 2012; Poaty et al. 2013), thermal and hydrothermal treatment (Fu et al. 2012; Wang et al. 2012, 2015), covalent grafting by more step procedures (Sèbe and Brook 2001; Mamiński et al. 2009; Liu et al. 2015), deposition of nanoparticles (Wang et al. 2011c, 2013; Shupe et al. 2012; Lu et al. 2014; Gao et al. 2016), and various layer-by-layer assembly methods (Rao et al. 2016).

Cold plasma treatment in the dry state is a simple and low energy consumption approach in this context. It allows the deposition and polymerisation of a wide range of monomers at temperatures which are slightly above room temperature, while the final characteristics of the layer can conveniently be controlled by the plasma polymerisation parameters. This technique is versatile (Denes and Young 1999), for instance it is suitable to improve hydrophilicity and wettability (Podgorski et al. 2000; Rehn and Viöl 2003; Busnel et al. 2010), to increase coating adhesion or hydrophobicity (Podgorski et al. 2002; Zanini et al. 2008; Poaty et al. 2013). The plasma polymerisation affects only the outer layer of the wood surface (Mai and Militz 2004). Fluorine-containing (e.g. CF4 and C6F14) and silicone-containing compounds (e.g. HMDSO) are often plasma polymerised in order to create a thin, hard and transparent hydrophobic layer containing highly-cross-linked and branched macromolecules (Denes et al. 1999). Podgorski et al. 2002 studied plasma modified polymer layers of fluorine-containing monomers, which were found to be more hydrophobic than layers based on HMDSO. Zanini et al. (2008) found that treating the wood surface consecutively first with HMDSO plasma and then SF6 plasma enhanced the hydrophobic character more compared to HMDSO plasma treatment alone. Usually, the static contact angle (CAstat) is around 130°.

The present work deals with the creation of submicron- and nano-scale roughness of wood surfaces brought about with a thermal aerosol based technique, called liquid flame spray (LFS) (Teisala et al. 2010; Mäkelä et al. 2011). LFS followed by plasma polymerisation leads to surfaces with CAs >130°. In the course of LFS, nanosized metal oxides particles are generated and deposited on the surface. The literature describes the fabrication of superhydrophobic and transparent layers on paperboards by LFS (Teisala et al. 2010, 2012; Tuominen et al. 2012). This approach is also attracktive because the original colour aesthetic appearance of the materials is not changed. In our previous studies (Sedighi Moghaddam et al. 2013, 2016), a multicycle Wilhelmy plate (mWP) method has been developed, which is based on a wood veneer is immersed and withdrawn from a liquid several times, while the force acting on the plate is continuously measured by a microbalance. It was demonstrated that this approach can be utilised to study the dynamics of sorption, swelling and dimensional stability of the porous materials wood.

In focus of the present study is the investigation of the effects LFS/plasma treatment by means of the mWP method. The expectation is that the dynamic contact angles (CAdyn) obtained will characterise the created surfaces better than the hitherto applied CAstat obtained by the sessile drop technique. Hydrophobic and superhydrophobic surfaces can be certainly better described by CAdyn and CA hysteresis (multi-cycle measurements). The focus of the scientific goals is a better understanding of the multi-scale roughness on the robustness of the wetting behavior of surfaces obtained by LFS/plasma treatment.

Materials and methods

Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) sapwood blocks (120×30×7 mm3 in the T, L, and R directions, respectively) were cut from larger kiln dried boards with a band saw and hand veneer saw. To prevent end-grain sorption, one cross-section of the block was sealed by polyurethane lacquer. Veneers with dimensions of approx. 30×7×1 mm3 (L×R×T, respectively) were then prepared by splitting the blocks along the fibre direction and from the same series of annual rings with a wood chisel. The wood veneers were wrapped in aluminium foil prior to further treatment. Double sided polished silicon wafers (Siegert Wafer GmbH, Aachen, Germany) with a thin silica surface layer served as reference substrates. These were cut to dimensions of 30×10×0.52 mm3 from silicon wafer discs, and cleaned by rinsing with water and analytical grade ethanol several times followed by drying under nitrogen stream. The wafers were finally cleaned in an 18 W air plasma cleaner (PDC-3XG, Harrick, Ithaca, USA) for 5 min.

Nano-sized metal oxide particles (TiO2) were deposited on the wood veneers (with a MC of 6–9%) by the liquid flame spray (LFS) method. To this purpose, a single nozzle type burner processing device developed at the Tampere University of Technology (Tampere, Finland) was applied. A detailed description of the LFS process is provided by Teisala et al. (2010), Mäkelä et al. (2011) and Stepien et al. (2011). The liquid precursor titanium tetraisopropoxide (97%, Aldrich, Sant Louis, USA) was diluted in isopropanol. The concentration of the precursor solution was 50 mg of atomic metal per ml. The precursor solutions together with the combustion gases (hydrogen and oxygen) were then provided to a specially designed burner for creating nanoparticles to be deposited onto the wood veneers. The flow rates of H2 and O2 were 50 and 15 l min-1, respectively. The feed rate was 6 ml min-1 and the deposition time was 10 s. LFS-generated nanoparticles were introduced indirectly onto the substrate by a tailor-made flow tube to avoid undesired effects of heat.

Plasma polymer deposition was carried out in an in-house constructed plasma reactor at SP, Technical Research Institute of Sweden, Stockholm (Cho et al. 1990; Pykönen 2010). The plasma reactor contains a glass vessel connected to a double-stage rotary vacuum pump (Leybold-Heraeus D 65 B, Colonge, Germany). Two externally wrapped, capacitively coupled, copper electrode bands were powered by a 13.56 MHz radio-frequency generator (ENI, Model ACG-3) connected to an automatic matching network (ENI, Model MW-5D). The nanoparticle-treated veneers were placed in the reactor followed by evacuating the chamber to a pressure below 1.3 Pa before introducing the monomer from the top of the reactor [hexamethyldisiloxane (HMDSO, ≥99.5%, Fluka, Steinheim, Germany) and perfluorohexane (PFH, ≥98%, Apollo Scientific, Manchester, UK)]. The plasma parameters were selected to obtain the same polymer thickness in both cases. The discharge power and pressure during the treatment were 150 W and 3.3 Pa for HMDSO, and 40 W and 18 Pa for PFH. The inlet flows were 5 and 40 ml min-1, respectively for HMDSO and PFH. The treatment time was 5 min in both cases. A schematic diagram of the combined LFS and plasma polymerisation on the substrate is presented in Figure 1.

Schematic illustration of the wood surface before and after deposition of nanoparticles, and after deposition of the top plasma polymer layer. The size of the particles and the plasma polymer layer are not drawn to scale.
Figure 1:

Schematic illustration of the wood surface before and after deposition of nanoparticles, and after deposition of the top plasma polymer layer. The size of the particles and the plasma polymer layer are not drawn to scale.

XPS analysis was performed in an AXIS UltraDLD X-ray photoelectron spectrometer (Kratos Analytical, Manchester, UK) equipped with a monochromatic Al Kα X-ray source operated at 150 W. For each sample type, two plates with approximate dimensions of 7×7×1 mm3 were prepared and the XPS analysis was carried out on one position (analysis area: 700×300 μm2) per plate. Survey spectra (lowly resolved at pass energy 160 eV) and detailed spectra (medium resolved at pass energy 80 eV) were recorded. The chemical shifts of the carbon signal, corresponding to different functional groups, were quantified by curve-fitting high-resolved carbon 1s spectra (highly resolved at pass energy 20 eV). XPS peaks were quantified with a linear background based on a combined Gaussian and Lorentzian type peak shape (70% and 30%). The relative sensitivity factors provided by the manufacturer were employed (C 1s=0.278, O 1s=0.780, Si 2p=0.328, and F 1s=1.000).

An atomic force microscope (AFM) Dimension Icon (Bruker, USA) was employed. Images were recorded in tapping mode in air with antimony (n) doped silicon rectangular cantilevers with a nominal tip radius of 8 nm (MPP-13120, Bruker). The NanoScope Analysis software (Bruker) was utilised. The thickness of the plasma polymer layers were measured based on an area of the silica substrates masked with a 10% (wt) solution of poly(d,l-lactide-co-glycolide) (Resomer® RG 755 S, Evonik, Darmstadt, Germany) in acetone, and then the same plasma polymer layer was applied on the masked substrate. The mask was removed by a scalpel from the surface and the substrate was then analysed again by recording 10×10 μm2 AFM tapping mode images with the same cantilever type. Finally, the “bearing analysis” feature in the NanoScope Analysis software was applied for measurement of thickness. The bearing analysis shows how much of a surface lies above or below a given height. The height histogram extracted for this feature gives two characteristic peaks corresponding to the substrate (silica) and the surface modified layer (plasma polymer) heights. By subtracting the lower value from the upper, the plasma polymer thickness was obtained.

A scanning electron microscope (SEM), FEI Quanta FEG 250 (Hillsboro, USA) was utilised. To avoid mechanically induced microcracks, sample preparation was performed by UV laser ablation (Wålinder et al. 2009). From the surface modified veneers, sections with the size of approx. 7×7×1 mm3 (L×R×T, respectively) were cut with a 248 nm laser. The instrument works in a low vacuum mode (LV-SEM), thus sputtering of the specimen surfaces is not needed. For the mWP method a sample in the form of a plate was immersed into and withdrawn from a probe liquid for several cycles, and the force acting on the plate was measured simultaneously (Sedighi Moghaddam et al. 2013). For porous and hygroscopic samples such as wood, the measured force F can be written as:

F(h,t)=Pγcosθ+Fw(t)-ρAhg (1)(1)

where P is the wetted perimeter of the plate, γ the surface tension of the probe liquid, θ the liquid-solid-air contact angle (CA), ρ the probe liquid density, A the cross-sectional area of the plate, h the immersion depth, g the gravitational constant and Fw(t) the force due to sorption of the liquid at time t. The method provides the advancing and receding contact angle (θA and θR), sorption and swelling, dimensional stability and answers the question, how extractives dissolution affects wettability properties. The unmodified wood surface becomes completely wetted by water after the first immersion, and thus only the advancing CA during the first immersion has a non-zero value. By modifying the wood surface, non-zero values of the advancing and receding CA could be obtained for the other cycles as well. For swellable materials as unmodified veneers, the sample perimeter is not constant during the measurement. In addition, the surface tension of the liquid (γ) may change with time/cycle as a result of extractives migration and dissolution in the liquid (Sedighi Moghaddam et al. 2013). However, for the hydrophobised samples in focus these quantities are close to a constant as a result of a very low level of water up-take, and no change in water surface tension was observed after the measurements. θA and θR can be obtained by linear regression of the corresponding curves extrapolated to zero depth (h=0) in the mWP plot (Figure 5), assuming that P and γ are constant, and Eq. 1 can be simplified to:

FA,n=PγcosθA,n+Ff,n-1 (2)(2)

FR,n=PγcosθR,n+Ff,n (3)(3)

where Ff,n-1 and Ff,n are the final forces after cycle n-1 and n, respectively, due to the sorption, which is the same as the term Fw(t) in Eq. 1.

The two CAs at cycle n, θA,n and θR,n, can be calculated as:

cosθA,n=FA,n-Ff,n-1Pγ (4)(4)

cosθR,n=FR,n-Ff,nPγ (5)(5)

Sorption is determined by linear regression of the final force, Ff, to zero depth for each cycle. The percentage of water mass up-take, relative the weight of the dry veneer, after cycle n, ln, is calculated as:

ln(%)=Ff,nmig×100 (6)(6)

where mi is the initial mass of the of oven dried plate (veneer).

A Sigma 70 tensiometer from KSV Instruments (Helsinki, Finland) was utilised for wettability measurements. A 20-cycle WP measurement was performed with the veneers and ultrapure water (resistivity >18 MΩ cm), with an immersion and withdrawal velocity of 12 mm min-1. The veneer was immersed to a depth of 10 mm and then withdrawn to 5 mm above the liquid surface. The veneers were after completion of the 20th cycle conditioned to ca. the same weight as before the immersion and then immersed in n-octane (≥99% from Alfa Aesar, Karlsruhe, Germany) to obtain precisely their perimeters (Sedighi Moghaddam et al. 2013). The surface tension of water and octane were 72.0±0.2 mN m-1 and 21.4±0.1 mN m-1, respectively, based on ten measurements. Measurements were performed at 22–23°C and 35±5% RH.

Results and discussion

Surface characterisation by XPS

The chemical surface composition is provided in Table 1. Trace amounts of Na, Ti, N, Ca, and S (<0.5% at.) were also observed in a few cases. Table 1 also presents the atomic ratio of Si/C (for HMDSO treated samples) and F/C (for PFH treated samples). As expected, a significant change in surface chemical composition occurred after deposition of the plasma polymer. Similar Si/C atomic ratio of the Si-HMDSO and wood-TiO2-HMDSO samples are indicative for similar surface chemistry. However, wood surfaces are more rich in oxygen than the silica coated surfaces (Table 1). Conversely, the F/C atomic ratio is significantly larger on the silica substrate than on the TiO2-treated wood substrate. The former is close to the value reported by Pykönen et al. (2010) for paper substrates treated in a similar manner. The trace amount of Si found in the wood-TiO2-PFH layer is unexpected, which will not affect the performance of the coating.

Table 1

Relative surface composition in atomic percentage and the Si/C and F/C ratios for various wood (W) and other surface layers.

The chemical shifts for the carbon (C1s) data are reported in Table 2 (Figure S1 in the Supplementary part). In theory, plasma polymerisation of HMDSO should lead to a highly branched and cross-linked siloxane polymer that contains only C1-carbon (Wróbel and Wertheimer 1990). However, as visible in Table 2, both Si-HMDSO and wood-TiO2-HMDSO surfaces contain a low amount of oxidised carbon, reported as the sum of C2+C3+C4, which is due to reactions with oxygen and trace amounts of water vapour present under the conditions of plasma polymerisation. For the PFH samples, the level of C6+C7 that represents carbon bound to fluorine was considered. Similar to the results of the elemental ratios (Table 1), inspection of the C1s spectra (Table 2) shows that the PFH treated silica substrate has more amount of C6+C7 compared to the wood-TiO2-PFH substrate. One explanation for this is that TiO2 can act as a catalyst for degradation of organic molecules and whereby promotes formation of more C1-carbons (Hoffmann et al. 1995). Moreover, wood extractives can migrate to the surface during the sample preparation (Sedighi Moghaddam et al. 2013) or during XPS analysis in high vacuum (Nguila Inari et al. 2011), leading to a higher level of C1-carbons because of the high hydrocarbon contents of extractives.

Table 2

The total amount of carbon for various wood (W) and other surface layers.

Surface characterisation by AFM

The thickness of the HMDSO and PFH plasma polymer layers on silica substrates was measured to be 29±6 nm and 31±2 nm, respectively. The root-mean-square (RMS) surface roughness and mean tapping phase angle are provided in Table 3 for the bare silica surface, and the Si-HMDSO- and Si-PFH-treated silica surfaces. Clearly, both the bare silica and the plasma polymer treated silica surfaces are smooth and thus are suitable references to the rough modified wood surfaces. The large change in phase angles (Table 3) is due to the softness of the plasma polymer layer.

Table 3

Surface roughness and phase angle of reference samples (silicon wafers) obtained from AFM height and phase images, respectively.

AFM height and phase images of bare and modified wood surfaces are illustrated in Figure 2. Obviously, when the plasma polymer is directly applied on the wood surface (Figure 2b and c some of the smaller morphological features of the native wood are no longer detectable (Figure 2a). Moreover, for TiO2 treated samples, the PFH plasma polymer layer follows the surface features more truly than in case of HMDSO plasma coating (compare Figure 2b with c and d with e). Thus, the HMDSO plasma polymer fills the space between small surface features, proving less fissured profiles than a PFH plasma polymer layer. This is most clearly observed for LFS treated surfaces (compare Figure 2d with e). One should bear in mind that mainly the nano-scale structure of the coatings is different but their micro-scale morphology (see SEM section) originating from the high roughness of the wood surface itself is more similar.

AFM height (left) and phase (right) images of (a) bare wood (b) wood-HMDSO, (c) wood-PFH, (d) wood-TiO2-HMDSO and (e) wood-TiO2-PFH.
Figure 2:

AFM height (left) and phase (right) images of (a) bare wood (b) wood-HMDSO, (c) wood-PFH, (d) wood-TiO2-HMDSO and (e) wood-TiO2-PFH.

Surface characterisation by SEM

SEM images of TiO2-PFH-treated wood and bare wood samples are presented in Figure 3. The image in Figure 3a illustrates the high roughness of the wood surface, which is in order of 100 μm. Comparing the images of surface modified samples (Figure 3b) with the image of the bare wood (Figure 3c) shows the deposition of nanoparticles and plasma polymer on the top surfaces.

SEM images of a TiO2-PFH-treated wood sample; (a) radial-tangential plane and (b) longitudinal-radial plane and (c) SEM image of bare wood from longitudinal-radial plane.
Figure 3:

SEM images of a TiO2-PFH-treated wood sample; (a) radial-tangential plane and (b) longitudinal-radial plane and (c) SEM image of bare wood from longitudinal-radial plane.

Multicycle Wilhelmy plate (mWP) wetting

The data collected during 20-cycle WP measurements for different selected samples are presented in Figure 4. As explained in the experimental part, the θA and θR of each cycle are evaluated and the veneers are fully withdrawn from the water for 50 s between two wetting cycles. Untreated silicon with a silica top layer has a very low CA (Figure 4a) which remains unchanged throughout the 20 cycles. PFH plasma treated surfaces are significantly more hydrophobic with relatively low hysteresis (Figure 4b) while for the silica-PFH system, θA is stable over the time and the θR decreases slightly.

Force per perimeter length as a function of sample position for 20-cycle Wilhelmy plate measurements for different sample surfaces. The advancing and receding contact angle data for the first cycle (θA,1 and θR,1) are presented for all samples.
Figure 4:

Force per perimeter length as a function of sample position for 20-cycle Wilhelmy plate measurements for different sample surfaces. The advancing and receding contact angle data for the first cycle (θA,1 and θR,1) are presented for all samples.

As seen in Figure 4c, the untreated wood surface has initially a weakly hydrophilic surface (θA,1=61°). The θR and all following θA values are zero due to the complete surface wetting. The force detected after removal of the sample from the liquid increases by each cycle due to water sorption as discussed by Sedighi Moghaddam et al. (2013). The wood-TiO2 surface (Figure 4d) is initially more hydrophobic (θA,1=110°) but for all cycles θR and for all subsequent cycles θA is zero. Also in this case, significant water sorption occurs because of the porous nature of the nanoparticle layer. High θA and θR can be achieved by treating the surface with a plasma polymer (Figure 4e), but a clear hysteresis is observable. When the plasma polymer is added on the top of the LFS layer resulting in higher hydrophobicity (Figure 4f), a relatively small hysteresis is. The advancing and receding curves measured during the different cycles are similar indicating an extended wetting stability. As seen in Figure 4e and f, the advancing curves are even in contrast to the receding curves. This was noticed for all wood-plasma and wood-nanoparticle-plasma samples and is most probably related to pinning of receding water (n.b. the jagged receding curves) due to combined hydrophobicity and surface roughness. The presence of the plasma polymer significantly reduces water sorption, as seen by the small change in final force observed in Figure 4e and f compared to the significantly larger changes observed in Figure 4c and d.

The θA, θR and hysteresis determined during the first and the last cycle (20th cycle) for the different surfaces are summarised in Table 4. The CA stability can be evaluated by the CA changes after 20 cycles. On the one hand, samples with only plasma polymer layer (wood-PFH and wood-HMDSO) show very high hysteresis compared to the surfaces which have both LFS and a plasma polymer layers. Thus, modification of the highly rough surface with hydrophobic polymers leads to a surface with a high θA and comparatively low θR related to the CA results on the smooth silica-HMDSO surface. In contrast, adding the multi-scale roughness to the surfaces with nanoparticles provided by the LFS method, results in surfaces with higher θA and θR and lower hysteresis.

Table 4

Advancing and receding CAs and hysteresis results for the first cycle and cycle 20 for different samples (W is for wood).

The PFH treated surfaces show slightly higher θR (lower hysteresis) compared to the HMDSO treated ones which are consistent with the fact that fluorocarbon is more hydrophobic than siloxanes. In summary, wood-TiO2-PFH surfaces revealed the highest θA and θR and the lowest hysteresis. This is explained by the topography, showing roughness features on multiple length scales, and the highly non-polar character of fluorocarbon. Hydrophobisation of wood by plasma polymerisation alone leads in most cases to a CAstat ≤130° (Denes et al. 1999; Podgorski et al. 2002; Zanini et al. 2008; Poaty et al. 2013). However, Bente et al. (2004) reported CAs around 145° on layers obtained by plasma polymerisation of silanes. Higher CA with a low hysteresis was attainable by combining a plasma polymerisation with an LFS deposition that enhances the roughness over smaller length scales than that provided by the natural wood surface.

Table 4 also reveals that multiscale rough surfaces (e.g. wood-TiO2-PFH) have more stable θA and θR over the time than a microscale rough surface (e.g. wood-PFH). In the former case, θA is not changed and θR lowered only in the range of 1–8° after the 20th cycle. In contrast, for the micro-scale rough surfaces, both θA and θR diminished as a function of the cycle numbers (i.e. of the time). It means that adding a nano-scale roughness to a micro-scale hydrophobic wood surface contributes to the stability of wetting properties. Accordingly, the mWP method is well suited for determination of CAdyn data including the hysteresis and the stability of the obtained effects.

The evaluation of the data by Eq. 6 is presented in Figure 5. It is clear that both PFH and HMDSO type plasma polymerisation reduce the water sorption. The benefit of the LFS layer is small, which can be attributed to its porous character.

Water up-take as a function of cycle number for unmodified and modified samples, (a) PFH treated veneers; (b) HMDSO treated veneers.
Figure 5:

Water up-take as a function of cycle number for unmodified and modified samples, (a) PFH treated veneers; (b) HMDSO treated veneers.

Conclusions

A thin, transparent and superhydrophobic layer on wood surface was achieved by combining plasma polymerisation and LFS. Modified wood surfaces with two different scales of roughness were prepared, i.e. (a) in micro-scale by means of plasma only and (b) multi-scale by combining LFS and plasma. The effect of detailed surface chemistry on the wetting properties were investigated based on two types of plasma polymer layers (PFH and HMDSO). The changes of advancing and receding contact angles (CA) were measured by the mWP method and in this way the dynamic wettability was studied over repeated cycles on surface modified samples. The LFS method in combination with plasma polymerisation has a high capability for maximising water repellence. The modified surfaces show CAs >150° with relative low hysteresis, while the surfaces treated only with plasma revealed a CA around 130° with high hysteresis. Thus, the multiscale roughness increased the hydrophobicity as well as the forced wetting durability compared to microscale roughness alone. According to AFM images, the HMDSO plasma polymer provides larger morphological features than the PFH plasma do. Shortly, CA hysteresis is higher for surfaces treated with HMDSO plasma than that treated with PFH plasma.

Supplementary material

XPS high resolution C1s spectra.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the Nils and Dorthi Troëdsson Foundation for Scientific Research for financial support within the sustainable wood modification PhD project for M.S.M. and the adjunct professorship for A.S. at KTH. M.S.M and M.W. acknowledge support from the Swedish Research Council FORMAS within EnWoBio (2014-172) project. Marie Ernstsson (SP) and Mikael Sundin (SP) are thanked for the XPS analyses. Johan Andersson is thanked for performing the plasma treatments at SP.

References

  • Avramidis, G., Hauswald, E., Lyapin, A., Militz, H., Viöl, W., Wolkenhauer, A. (2009) Plasma treatment of wood and wood-based materials to generate hydrophilic or hydrophobic surface characteristics. Wood Mat. Sci. Eng. 4:52–60. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Banerjee, I., Pangule, R.C., Kane, R.S. (2011) Antifouling coatings: recent developments in the design of surfaces that prevent fouling by proteins, bacteria, and marine organisms. Adv. Mater. 23:690–718. CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar

  • Bente, M., Avramidis, G., Förster, S., Rohwer, E.G., Viöl, W. (2004) Wood surface modification in dielectric barrier discharges at atmospheric pressure for creating water repellent characteristics. Eur. J. Wood Wood Prod. 62:157–163. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Busnel, F., Blanchard, V., Prégent, J., Stafford, L., Riedl, B., Blanchet, P., Sarkissian, A. (2010) Modification of sugar maple (Acer saccharum) and black spruce (Picea mariana) wood surfaces in a dielectric barrier discharge (DBD) at atmospheric pressure. J. Adhes. Sci. Technol. 24:1401–1413. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Callies, M., Quere, D. (2005) On water repellency. Soft Matter 1:55–61. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Cao, L., Jones, A.K., Sikka, V.K., Wu, J., Gao, D. (2009) Anti-Icing superhydrophobic coatings. Langmuir 25:12444–12448. PubMedCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Cho, D.L., Claesson, P.M., Gölander, C.G., Johansson, K. (1990) Structure and surface properties of plasma polymerized acrylic acid layers. Appl. Polym. Sci. 41:1373–1390. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Denes, A.R., Young, R.A. (1999) Reduction of weathering degradation of wood through plasma-polymer coating. Holzforschung 53:632–640. Google Scholar

  • Denes, A.R., Tshabalala, M.A., Rowell, R., Denes, F., Young, R.A. (1999) Hexamethyldisiloxane-plasma coating of wood surfaces for creating water repellent characteristics. Holzforschung 53:318–326. Google Scholar

  • Fu, Y., Yu, H., Sun, Q., Li, G., Liu, Y. (2012) Testing of the superhydrophobicity of a zinc oxide nanorod array coating on wood surface prepared by hydrothermal treatment. Holzforschung 66:739–744. Google Scholar

  • Gao, L., Lu, Y., Li, J., Sun, Q. (2016) Superhydrophobic conductive wood with oil repellency obtained by coating with silver nanoparticles modified by fluoroalkyl silane. Holzforschung 70:63–68. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Gholamiyan, H., Tarmian, A., Ranjbar, Z., Abdulkhani, A., Azadfallah, M., Mai, C. (2016) Silane nanofilm formation by sol-gel processes for promoting adhesion of waterborne and solvent-borne coatings to wood surface. Holzforschung 70:429–437. Google Scholar

  • Hoffmann, M.R., Martin, S.T., Choi, W., Bahnemann, D.W. (1995) Environmental applications of semiconductor photocatalysis. Chem. Rev. 95:69–96. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hsieh, C.T., Wu, F.L., Yang, S.Y. (2008) Superhydrophobicity from composite nano/microstructures: carbon fabrics coated with silica nanoparticles. Surf. Coat. Tech. 202:6103–6108. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Levasseur, O., Stafford, L., Gherardi, N., Naudé, N., Blanchard, V., Blanchet, P., Riedl, B., Sarkissian, A. (2012) Deposition of hydrophobic functional groups on wood surfaces using atmospheric-pressure dielectric barrier discharge in helium-hexamethyldisiloxane gas mixtures. Plasma Proc. Polym. 9:1168–1175. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Liu, F., Gao, Z., Zang, D., Wang, C., Li, J. (2015) Mechanical stability of superhydrophobic epoxy/silica coating for better water resistance of wood. Holzforschung 69:367–374. Google Scholar

  • Lu, Y., Xiao, S., Gao, R., Li, J., Sun, Q. (2014) Improved weathering performance and wettability of wood protected by CeO2 coating deposited onto the surface. Holzforschung 68:345–351. Google Scholar

  • Ma, M., Hill, R.M. (2006) Superhydrophobic surfaces. Curr. Opin. Colloid Interface. Sci. 11:193–202. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Mahltig, B., Swaboda, C., Roessler, A., Bottcher, H. (2008) Functionalising wood by nanosol application. J. Mater. Chem. 18:3180–3192. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Mai, C., Militz, H. (2004) Modification of wood with silicon compounds. Treatment systems based on organic silicon compounds-a review. Wood Sci. Tech. 37:453–461. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Mäkelä, J.M., Aromaa, M., Teisala, H., Tuominen, M., Stepien, M., Saarinen, J.J., Toivakka, M., Kuusipalo, J. (2011) Nanoparticle deposition from liquid flame spray onto moving roll-to-roll paperboard material. Aerosol Sci. Tech. 45:827–837. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Mamiński, M.Ł., Mierzejewska, K., Borysiuk, P., Parzuchowski, P., Boruszewski, P. (2009) Surface properties of octadecanol-grafted pine veneers. Int. J. Adhes. Adhes. 29:781–784. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Manolache, S., Jiang, H., Rowell, R.M., Denes, F.S. (2008) Hydrophobic wood surfaces generated by non-equilibrium, atmospheric pressure (NEAPP) plasma-enhanced coating. Mol. Cryst. Liq. Cryst. 483:348–351. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Nguila Inari, G., Pétrissans, M., Dumarcay, S., Lambert, J., Ehrhardt, J.J., Šernek, M., Gérardin, P. (2011) Limitation of XPS for analysis of wood species containing high amounts of lipophilic extractives. Wood Sci.Tech. 45:369–382. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Poaty, B., Riedl, B., Blanchet, P., Blanchard, V., Stafford, L. (2013) Improved water repellency of black spruce wood surfaces after treatment in carbon tetrafluoride plasmas. Wood Sci.Tech. 47:411–422. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Podgorski, L., Chevet, B., Onic, L., Merlin, A. (2000) Modification of wood wettability by plasma and corona treatments. Int. J. Adhes. Adhes. 20:103–111. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Podgorski, L., Bousta, C., Schambourg, F., Maguin, J., Chevet, B. (2002) Surface modification of wood by plasma polymerisation. Pigm. Resin Tech. 31:33–40. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Probst, F., Laborie, M.P., Pizza, A., Deglise, X.H. (1997) Molecular mechanics/experimental methods applied to varnish/primer/wood interactions. Holzforschung 51:459–466. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Pykönen, M. Influence of Plasma Modification on Surface Properties and Offset Printability of Coated Paper. Ph.D. Thesis, Åbo Akademi University, Åbo, Finland, 2010. ISBN 978-952-12-2427-0. Google Scholar

  • Pykönen, M., Johansson, K., Dubreuil, M., Vangeneugden, D., Ström, G., Fardim, P., Toivakka, M. (2010) Evaluation of plasma-deposited hydrophobic coatings on pigment-coated paper for reduced dampening water absorption. J. Adhes. Sci. Technol. 24:511–537. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Rao, X., Liu, Y., Fu, Y., Liu, Y., Yu, H. (2016) Formation and properties of polyelectrolytes/TiO2 composite coating on wood surfaces through layer-by-layer assembly method. Holzforschung 70:361–367. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Rehn, P., Viöl, W. (2003) Dielectric barrier discharge treatments at atmospheric pressure for wood surface modification. Holz Roh- Werkst. 61:145–150. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Rowell, R. (1982) Wood preservation and stabilization by chemical modification of the wood substance, chemical aspects of wood technology. STFI Series, Swedish Forest Products Research Laboratory, Stockholm (S) 772:18. Google Scholar

  • Rowell, R. M., Ed. Handbook of Wood Chemistry and Wood Composites, Second edition, CRC press, Boca Raton, FL, 2012. Google Scholar

  • Sèbe, G., Brook, M.A. (2001) Hydrophobization of wood surfaces: covalent grafting of silicone polymers. Wood Sci. Tech. 35:269–282. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Sedighi Moghaddam, M., Wålinder, M.E.P. Claesson, P.M., Swerin, A. (2013) Multicycle Wilhelmy plate method for wetting properties, swelling and liquid sorption of wood. Langmuir 29:12145–12153. PubMedCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Sedighi Moghaddam, M., Wålinder, M.E.P., Claesson, P.M., Swerin, A. (2016) Wettability and swelling of acetylated and furfurylated wood analyzed by multicycle Wilhelmy plate method. Holzforschung 70:69–77. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Shupe, T., Piao, C., Lucas, C. (2012) The termiticidal properties of superhydrophobic wood surfaces treated with ZnO nanorods. Eur. J. Wood Wood Prod. 70:531–535. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Stepien, M., Saarinen, J.J., Teisala, H., Tuominen, M., Aromaa, M., Kuusipalo, J., Mäkelä, J.M., Toivakka, M. (2011) Adjustable wettability of paperboard by liquid flame spray nanoparticle deposition. Appl. Surf. Sci. 257:1911–1917. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Teisala, H., Tuominen, M., Aromaa, M., Mäkelä, J.M., Stepien, M., Saarinen, J.J., Toivakka, M., Kuusipalo, J. (2010) Development of superhydrophobic coating on paperboard surface using the liquid flame spray. Surf. Coat. Tech. 205:436–445. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Teisala, H., Tuominen, M., Aromaa, M., Stepien, M., Mäkelä, J.M., Saarinen, J.J., Toivakka, M., Kuusipalo, J. (2012) Nanostructures increase water droplet adhesion on hierarchically rough superhydrophobic surfaces. Langmuir 28:3138–3145. CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar

  • Tuominen, M., Teisala, H., Aromaa, M., Stepien, M., Mäkelä, J.M., Saarinen, J.J., Toivakka, M., Kuusipalo, J. (2012) Creation of superhydrophilic surfaces of paper and board. J. Adhes. Sci. Tech. 28:864–879. Google Scholar

  • Wålinder, M.E.P., Omidvar, A., Seltman, J., Segerholm, K. (2009) Micromorphological studies of modified wood using a surface preparation technique based on ultraviolet laser ablation. Wood Mat. Sci. Eng. 4:46–51. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Wang, S., Liu, C., Liu, G., Zhang, M., Li, J., Wang, C. (2011a) Fabrication of superhydrophobic wood surface by a sol-gel process. Appl. Surf. Sci. 258:806–810. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Wang, S., Mahlberg, R., Jämsä, S., Nikkola, J., Mannila, J., Ritschkoff, A.C., Peltonen, J. (2011b) Surface properties and moisture behaviour of pine and heat-treated spruce modified with alkoxysilanes by sol-gel process. Prog. Org. Coat. 71:274–282. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Wang, C., Piao, C., Lucas, C. (2011c) Synthesis and characterization of superhydrophobic wood surfaces. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 119:1667–1672. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Wang, S., Wang, C., Liu, C., Zhang, M., Ma, H., Li, J. (2012) Fabrication of superhydrophobic spherical-like α-FeOOH films on the wood surface by a hydrothermal method. Colloid Surface A 403:29–34. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Wang, X., Chai, Y., Liu, J. (2013) Formation of highly hydrophobic wood surfaces using silica nanoparticles modified with long-chain alkylsilane. Holzforschung 67:667–672. Google Scholar

  • Wang, W., Zhu, Y., Cao, J., Guo, X. (2015) Thermal modification of Southern pine combined with wax emulsion preimpregnation: effect on hydrophobicity and dimensional stability. Holzforschung 69:405–413. Google Scholar

  • Wróbel, A.M., Wertheimer, M.R. (1990) Plasma-polymerized organosilicones and organometallics. In: Plasma Deposition, Treatment, and Etching of Polymers. Ed. R. d’Agostino, Academic Press, San Diego. pp. 163–268. Google Scholar

  • Zanini, S., Riccardi, C., Orlandi, M., Fornara, V., Colombini, M.P., Donato, D., Legnaioli, S., Palleschi, V. (2008) Wood coated with plasma-polymer for water repellence. Wood Sci. Tech. 42:149–160. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

Supplemental Material:

The online version of this article (DOI: 10.1515/hf-2015-0148) offers supplementary material, available to authorized users.

About the article

Corresponding author: Maziar Sedighi Moghaddam, SP Technical Research Institute of Sweden, Chemistry, Materials and Surfaces, Box 5607, SE-114 86 Stockholm, Sweden; and KTH Royal Institute of Technology, School of Architecture and the Built Environment, Department of Civil and Architectural Engineering, Building Materials, SE-100 44 Stockholm, Sweden, e-mail: maziar.sedighi@sp.se


Received: 2015-06-29

Accepted: 2015-09-30

Published Online: 2015-11-17

Published in Print: 2016-06-01


Citation Information: Holzforschung, Volume 70, Issue 6, Pages 527–537, ISSN (Online) 1437-434X, ISSN (Print) 0018-3830, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/hf-2015-0148.

Export Citation

©2016 by De Gruyter.Get Permission

Supplementary Article Materials

Citing Articles

Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.

[1]
Weimin Chen, Xiaoyan Zhou, Xiaotao Zhang, Mohammad Feizbakhshan, Yizhong Cao, Shukai Shi, Thiphuong Nguyen, and Minzhi Chen
Progress in Organic Coatings, 2018, Volume 125, Page 128
[2]
Zhe Wang, Xiaoping Shen, Yutao Yan, Temeng Qian, Junjie Wang, Qingfeng Sun, and Chunde Jin
Applied Surface Science, 2018
[3]
Sven Gerullis, Andreas Pfuch, Sebastian Spange, Florian Kettner, Katharina Plaschkies, Berrin Küzün, Pavel V. Kosmachev, Gennady G. Volokitin, and Bernd Grünler
European Journal of Wood and Wood Products, 2017
[4]
[5]
Anuj Kumar, Jan Richter, Jan Tywoniak, Petr Hajek, Stergios Adamopoulos, Urban Šegedin, and Marko Petrič
Holzforschung, 2017, Volume 0, Number 0
[6]
Jesús Esteban, Thomas E. Moxon, Tom A. H. Simons, Serafim Bakalis, and Peter J. Fryer
Langmuir, 2017, Volume 33, Number 28, Page 7015
[7]
J. Profili, O. Levasseur, A. Koronai, L. Stafford, and N. Gherardi
Surface and Coatings Technology, 2017, Volume 309, Page 729

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in