Lipedema (lipoedema in Europe) is a chronic condition of painful fat transmitted in an autosomal dominant matter with a sex preference for women  that manifests as symmetrical enlargement of the limbs, sparing the hands, feet and trunk . Men with lipedema have been reported in the literature only as case reports and tend to have conditions associated with higher estrogen and lower relative testosterone levels, such as male hypogonadism and liver disease , , . What makes lipedema fat unique is that it is resistant to reduction by diet and exercise called “persistent fat”; in fact loss of non-lipedema fat can result in a dramatic size disparity between the trunk and enlarged fat on the limbs.
Lipedema fat was first described by Drs. Allen and Hines in 1940 as offering “abnormally poor resistance to the passage of fluid into the tissue from the blood thus permitting edema to occur” . This definition suggests lipedema is a connective tissue disorder where loss of elastic recoil in adipose tissue allows fluid to collect rather than exit into lymphatics. This loss of recoil is seen when dye is injected into lipedema tissue; instead of forming a small rounded spot before entering lymphatics, the dye seeps into the tissue forming flame-like structures . A 1.5 million base pair deletion of chromosomal 7q11.23 resulting in the loss of a series of genes including ELN for elastin, an important component of connective tissue, results in Williams syndrome, a constellation of signs and symptoms including a lipedema phenotype in both males and females . The association of lipedema tissue with loss of elasticity supports lipedema as a connective tissue disorder, though because of the complexity of adipose tissue, other connective tissue mutations or mutations affecting connective tissue structure are likely important in lipedema as well. Consistent with loss of elasticity, aortic stiffness develops in Williams syndrome  and in lipedema . Increases in fluid and fat in the area of lipedema can result in deformations of the tissue (Figure 1) hindering ambulation and self-care.
Lipedema is underdiagnosed by healthcare providers and is often misdiagnosed as obesity or lymphedema. The name, lipedema, sounds like lipidemia or lipemia, alteration of blood fats, increasing confusion when patients bring up lipedema and providers hear a different diagnosis. The prevalence and incidence of lipedema are unknown though it is thought to be common; lymphedema and lymphatic and vascular clinics report a prevalence rate for lipedema of 6.5–18.8% in their patients , , , , , , , . A small study in Germany of 62 women in a single company resulted in a prevalence rate for lipedema of 9.7% .
Lipedema generally manifests during puberty, although it can appear at other times of hormonal change such as childbirth or menopause. This evidence plus the predominant occurrence of lipedema in females suggests importance of sex hormones in the development of this disorder. Indeed, the distribution of lipedema fat is in the female gynoid distribution (lower abdomen, hips, buttocks, thighs and lower leg), resulting in disproportion between the upper and lower body with a waist to hip ratio <1. Lipedema fat is present on the arms in 80% of women with lipedema , but the gynoid distribution of lipedema fat dominates. There are three stages of lipedema and four types (Figure 2). The skin in lipedema can be smooth but the underlying fat is increased and contains pearl-sized nodules (Stage 1); or the skin can be indented over pearl-sized fat nodules and larger fat masses (Stage 2); or the skin can contain divots and folds over pearl-sized fat and larger fat masses with characteristic deforming fat lobules (Stage 3). Stage 4 is characterized by the development of lymphedema with lipedema better known as lipolymphedema and can occur with any stage . Approximately 80% of women with lipedema have lipedema fat on their arms (Type IV) therefore this type of lipedema occurs jointly with lipedema affecting the legs. Lipedema fat can occur around the hips and buttocks (Type I), waist to knees like riding breeches (Type II) or waist to the ankles (Type III). It is rare to see lipedema fat dominate on the lower legs (Type V) .
This paper will highlight the benefits and the downsides, the friend and foe aspects, of lipedema.
This study was approved by the University of Arizona human subjects protection program. The following benefits and downsides of lipedema were collected from discussions during clinic visits with women with lipedema on benefits (friend) and downsides (foe) of lipedema, a review of medical charts of women with lipedema at Banner University of Arizona Medical Center over 6 months from 12 April 2017 to 12 October 2017, and using search terms “lipedema” and “lipoedema” in the database National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) [Internet]. Bethesda (MD): National Library of Medicine (US), National Center for Biotechnology Information;  – [cited 2017 Oct 01]. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/.
Hypertension was noted for blood pressure ≥140/90 mm Hg or use of antihypertensive medication. Diabetes was identified by hemoglobin A1C (A1C) or history of diabetes (including gestational) with use of antidiabetic medication. Pre-diabetes was identified by A1C 6.5% or higher, history or use of medication for pre-diabetes, specifically metformin  as no other medications were used. Data are presented ± standard error of the mean. Differences between means were analyzed by non-parametric analysis of variance (ANOVA) and the Kruskal-Wallis test followed by a Dunn’s multiple comparison test.
Friend: the upside of lipedema fat
Women with lipedema report little if any benefit in having lipedema. The following are potential benefits of lipedema.
Low risk of diabetes despite higher body mass index (BMI): A study of 160 participants with lipedema showed a low prevalence of diabetes of 6 ± 0.2% despite an average BMI of 39 ± 12 kg/m2  compared to 10.7% of women with diabetes with a similar age range. The risk of diabetes was even lower at 2 ± 0.1% in a smaller study of 51 participants with lipedema who had a similar average BMI of 38 ± 2 kg/m2 . Gynoid fat has been shown to be negatively correlated with insulin resistance after total fat adjustment, whereas the opposite was found for abdominal fat, suggesting that lipedema fat may have a protective effect against diabetes . Data tabulated for this study also suggests that the risk of diabetes is low in lipedema (∼2%) for an average BMI of 35.3 ± 1.7 kg/m2; the risk of pre-diabetes increased in Stages 2 and 3 (Table 1), suggesting that the risk of diabetes may increase with stage. Research on insulin sensitivity in women with lipedema is needed preferably using the gold standard glucose clamp procedure.
Normal blood pressure despite obese BMI: In this study, hypertension was present in less than 30% of women with Stages 2 and 3 and not present in women with Stage 1 lipedema (Table 1). National data suggests hypertension rates in women of any BMI age 40–59 year was 32.4% ; higher hypertension rates of 60% were reported for obese Caucasian women mean age 63 year . The presence of hypertension in women with Stages 2–3 is concerning and larger populations should be studied to better understand the risk of hypertension with lipedema stage.
Gynoid shape and cardiovascular disease (CVD): Lipedema fat in the absence of abdominal obesity confers a gynoid shape with a greater amount of fat in the gynoid area, hips, buttocks and legs, compared to the upper body . The presence of gynoid fat confers lower cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk compared to android fat (abdominal obesity) . The use of body shape along with weight has been shown to provide a better estimate of risk of morbidity than weight alone . Women with lipedema may therefore have lower CVD risk due to gynoid fat (Table 1). The presence of CVD in women with lipedema should be studied to better understand any risk of lipedema fat.
Resistance of lipedema fat to loss by lifestyle changes: Lipedema fat resists loss by extreme dieting and/or over-exercise , . This persistent fat is especially frustrating for women with lipedema, when women without lipedema can lose weight by less extreme measures. What is concerning is that women with lipedema find it difficult to lose weight prior to a needed surgery or other procedures. This aspect of lipedema is a foe, but there may be an evolutionary benefit to a woman having lipedema fat . For example, in times of famine, women with lipedema could have retained fat maintaining fertility and the ability to breast-feed their children, passing on their genes within the population.
Normal lipid panel despite higher BMI: Women with gynoid fat had lower fasting triglyceride-rich lipoprotein, and lower triglyceride levels and smaller chylomicron particle size after a mixed test meal providing 40 g triglycerides than women with android obesity , suggesting that gynoid fat protects against abnormal blood lipids that would confer a cardiovascular risk. The majority of women with lipedema in the current study had a normal lipid profile (Table 1), where only 11.7% had high total cholesterol ≥240 mg/dL (considered high) compared to 33.5% of females in the general population  and even higher percentages when females were obese .
Buoyancy: Lipedema fat offers dramatic buoyancy in water making water activities enjoyable. Women who cannot swim to the bottom of a swimming pool or scuba dive without a very heavy weight belt do not find this beneficial.
Compassion: Women with lipedema, recognizing the existence of persistent fat, have developed compassion for people who are overweight and obese and their struggles with weight loss. This compassion is important in our society that is rampant with fat bias , .
Beautiful face: Women with lipedema state that they have fewer wrinkles and a more youthful face than women without lipedema.
Healthy lifestyle: As women with lipedema journey through life trying multiple diets to try and diminish lipedema fat, they might become very educated about food and aware early on in life how to eat nutritiously; this benefits not only women with lipedema but their children who are at risk for lipedema due to the autosomal dominant heritage pattern of lipedema .
Foe: the downside of lipedema fat
Lipedema fat resists diet and exercise: Despite over-exercise and extreme dieting, lipedema fat (shape) remains while normal or obese fat can be lost. Published studies on different diets may shed more light on this aspect of the disease. In general, women with lipedema reduce non-lipedema fat with diets low in processed carbohydrates either with anti-inflammatory foods high in fruits and vegetables  or with protein and fats to induce ketosis. Failure to lose weight with dieting results in eating disorders, and in one study, increased risk for suicide in lipedema patients .
Pain: Women with lipedema have fat pain that commonly occurs after the tissue is pressed or palpated but also in the absence of contact. The pain is definitely associated with lipedema fat, as suction assisted lipectomy (liposuction) significantly reduces the pain . Joint pain is not uncommon in lipedema especially the knees and low back, the latter due to lordosis and changes in the structure of the spine (especially degenerative disc disease), tendons and ligaments. Hypermobility may also contribute to joint damage and pain in women with lipedema.
Obesity: Women with lipedema are at elevated risk for developing morbid obesity. Obesity is itself a risk factor for lymphedema  which can exacerbate lipedema  (Figure 1 and Figure 3). Lymphedema is the retention of fluid in tissues causing swelling due to congenital or acquired damage to the lymphatic system. The term “lipedema” is defined as “fluid in fat”, therefore, excess tissue fluid from lymphedema not only adds to the fluid already present in lipedema fat, but induces additional fat growth  adding to the burden of fat in lipedema.
Gait abnormalities and leg joint issues: Excess lipedema fat on the buttocks, hips, thighs and lower legs changes the gait of women with lipedema, resulting in stress on the joints, especially the knees  often causing genu valgum (knock knees), an antalgic gait and overpronation of the feet (Figure 1). These issues can be caused, enhanced and exacerbated by hypermobility. Gait disturbance and knee pain reduce the desire and ability to ambulate, which can lead to further risk of obesity.
Gynoid fat and lymph flow: Lymph flow is inhibited and lymphatic  and blood capillaries leak in gynoid fat . Though studies on gynoid fat have not specifically focused on lipedema, it is likely that if lipedema does affect millions of women worldwide, then many of the women in these studies likely had lipedema. Women with Stages 2 or 3 lipedema are more likely to develop lymphedema compared to women with Stage 1 .
Lower resting energy expenditure (REE): Women with lipedema were found to have lower REE than expected calculations . These studies need to be repeated because the methods were not clearly defined. The lower REE may represent a lower metabolism in lipedema fat such that women with more lipedema fat per body weight should have lower REE than matched women with less lipedema fat. This localized lower metabolic rate in lipedema fat could partly explain the failure of lipedema fat to reduce with diet and exercise, in addition to increasing the risk for obesity.
Psychosocial distress: The impact of lipedema on the life of a woman with lipedema has been well documented . This includes relief felt when finally getting a diagnosis, followed by feelings of frustration and despair when realizing that treatment may not improve symptoms as much as they had hoped; difficulty in self-care; a social stigma attached to increased body size and physical restrictions; anxiety; depression; self-loathing; discrimination especially not fitting into seats in public spaces such as airplanes or toilets; lack of understanding and fear expressed by family, friends and colleagues; verbal abuse from members of the public; failure to form relationships; all of which can result in social avoidance, withdrawal and isolation.
Aortic disease: Women with lipedema were found to have higher mean systolic and diastolic aortic diameters and aortic stiffness index, while aortic strain and distensibility were significantly lower compared to controls by transthoracic echocardiogram . These aortic parameters may be present due to hypermobility and the resultant connective tissue changes in the aorta. While these parameters are thought to increase the risk for CVD, metabolic risks such as blood pressure and dyslipidemia may confer less cardiovascular risk in women with lipedema. These data again support the need for targeted studies on CVD in women with lipedema to determine if lipedema fat is protective or not.
Fatigue: In one study, ∼75% of women with lipedema complained of fatigue . Women do report higher levels of fatigue than men and fatigue increases with chronic disease . As comparator populations, up to 45.8% of women in the workforce report fatigue , while fatigue was present in 38.6% of women with chronic musculoskeletal pain and inflammatory joint disease . Brain fog or difficulty with cognition can also accompany fatigue .
Hypermobility: Hypermobility appears to be prevalent in the lipedema population. In one study over half of 160 patients with lipedema, average age 50 year and BMI 39 kg/m2 had hypermobile joints . Hypermobility confers risk for additional joint damage and alteration of gait in women with lipedema (Figure 1). Skin changes including thin skin and tattoos that leak into the skin can be found in women who are hypermobile. Hypermobility may change the structure of the lipedema tissue affecting how much fluid fat can accommodate, leakage of fluid from vessels, dilation of vessels and dysfunction of capillaries. Women with lipedema also have higher aortic distensibility and strain, reliable characteristics of arterial elasticity , also suggestive of connective tissue changes consistent with hypermobility, and possibly risk for cardiovascular mortality.
The majority if not all of women with lipedema in our practice agree that foe wins over friend with reference to lipedema. While persistent fat may be evolutionarily beneficial in times of famine, today when food is plentiful throughout the lifetime of a woman with lipedema, the true evolutionary benefit of this fat is unclear.
Reducing the foe aspect of lipedema fat
A multi-pronged approach is needed for women with lipedema. Standard treatment recommendations for lipedema are (1) healthy low carbohydrate eating plans to keep obesity at bay; (2) increasing metabolism through exercise by activating the muscle pump to improve venous and lymphatic flow and muscle fitness; (3) complete decongestive therapy to include manual lymphatic drainage; (4) skin care to reduce dryness and cracks that increase the risk for infection (cellulitis) especially when lymphedema is present; (5) recommendations for compression garments; (6) a sequential pneumatic compression pump and (7) psychological care. Additional treatment recommendations include:
Medical support: Care from family, friends, primary care providers including gynecologists who may have the ability to diagnose the development of lipedema at puberty and educate early to prevent progression, orthopedic surgeons willing to operate on the knees of women with lipedema, healthcare providers with expertise in lymphedema, physical and occupational therapists with knowledge and training about the lymphatic system who are also not afraid to treat deeper into the tissue and reduce fibrosis , professionals who can provide psychological services and compression garment fitters are needed to improve the quality of life for women with lipedema.
Groups: Internet groups but also national and local groups are useful for women with lipedema to share resources, provide comfort and support, allow for spiritual strengthening and self-love.
Subcutaneous adipose tissue therapy: Manual lymphatic drainage therapy as a part of decongestive therapy with or without sequential pneumatic pump therapy has improved capillary fragility in women with lipedema , . Deep manual treatment into the lipedema fat has improved pain and quality of the lipedema fat . Other techniques such as Astym® therapy and Graston Technique® have in practice been shown to reduce fibrosis in lipedema fat and also improve blood flow in tissue  as well as joint, tendon and ligament issues associated with hypermobility .
Treatments can have an economic impact on the patients with lipedema as doctor visits, clinical imaging, pain medication, surgeries, exercise equipment and healthier food alternatives and definitely, liposuction, are often expensive and not covered by insurance or are accompanied by large co-pays.
Lipedema is a foe for women reducing quality of life, inhibiting their ability to lose weight from areas of persistent lipedema fat and putting them at risk for the development of mobility issues, joint deformations and lymphedema. Despite lipedema fat causing overweight and obesity, lipedema can be a friend metabolically until later stages. Treatments can reduce pain and quality of lipedema fat but only liposuction to date has reduced lipedema fat.
The authors wish to thank Dr. med. Josef Stutz for the photo used for Figure 1.
Herbst K, Mirkovskaya L, Bharhagava A, Chava Y, Te CH. Lipedema fat and signs and symptoms of illness, increase with advancing stage. Arch Med. 2015;7:1–8. Google Scholar
Tiedjen KV, Knorz S. Different methods of diagnostic imaging in lymphedema, lipedema and venous disorders: indirect lymphography, xeroradiography, CT and isotope lymphography. In: Cluzan RV, Pecking AP, Lokiec FM, editors. Progress in lymphology: XIII, International Congress of Lymphology. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishers B.V.; 1992. Google Scholar
Waxler JL, Guardino C, Feinn RS, Lee H, Pober BR, Stanley TL. Altered body composition, lipedema, and decreased bone density in individuals with Williams syndrome: a preliminary report. Eur J Med Genet. 2017;60:250–6. CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Kozel BA, Danback JR, Waxler JL, Knutsen RH, de Las Fuentes L, Reusz GS, et al. Williams syndrome predisposes to vascular stiffness modified by antihypertensive use and copy number changes in NCF1. Hypertension. 2014;63:74–9. PubMedCrossrefGoogle Scholar
Földi E, Földi M. Das Lipödem. In: Földi M, Földi E, Kubik S, editors. Lehrbuch der Lymphologie für Mediziner, Masseure und Physiotherapeuten. Munich, Germany: Elsevier, Urban & Fischer; 2005. p. 443–53. Google Scholar
Herpertz U. Disease spectrum of lipoedema at a specialist lymphological clinic - manifestations, mixed pictures and treatment options. Vasomed. 1997;301–7. Google Scholar
Herpertz U. The Lipedema. Lymphologie. 1995;19:1–11. Google Scholar
Forner-Cordero I, Szolnoky G, Forner-Cordero A, Kemény L. Lipedema: an overview of its clinical manifestations, diagnosis and treatment of the disproportional fatty deposition syndrome – systematic review. Clin Obes. 2012;2:86–95. PubMedCrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schook CC, Mulliken JB, Fishman SJ, Alomari AI, Grant FD, Greene AK. Differential diagnosis of lower extremity enlargement in pediatric patients referred with a diagnosis of lymphedema. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011;127:1571–81. CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Meier-Vollrath I, Schneider W, Schmeller W. Lipedema: improved quality of life through combination therapy. Dtsch Ärzteblatt. 2005;102:A1061–7. Google Scholar
Marshall M, Schwahn-Schreiber C. Prävalenz des Lipödems bei berufstätigen Frauen in Deutschland (Lipödem-3-Studie). Phlebologie. 2011;3:127–34. Google Scholar
Munguia N, Herbst KL. Lipedema: abnormal female fat that just won’t go away. Overview with treatment suggestions. Pathways Magazine. 2016;5–8. Google Scholar
Garber AJ, Abrahamson MJ, Barzilay JI, Blonde L, Bloomgarden ZT, Bush MA, et al. Consensus statement by the american association of clinical endocrinologists and american college of endocrinology on the comprehensive type 2 diabetes management algorithm–2015 executive summary. Endocr Pract. 2015;21:1403–14. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Te C, Herbst KL. Case report: lymphatic dysfunction in a patient with familial multiple angiolipomatosis. 2018.(submitted). Google Scholar
Pinnick KE, Nicholson G, Manolopoulos KN, McQuaid SE, Valet P, Frayn KN, et al. Distinct developmental profile of lower-body adipose tissue defines resistance against obesity-associated metabolic complications. Diabetes. 2014;63:3785–97. PubMedCrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nwankwo T, Yoon SS, Burt V, Gu Q. Hypertension among adults in the United States: National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 2011–2012. NCHS Data Brief. 2013;133:1–8. Google Scholar
Nelson TL, Hunt KJ, Rosamond WD, Ammerman AS, Keyserling TC, Mokdad AH, et al. Obesity and associated coronary heart disease risk factors in a population of low-income African-American and white women: the North Carolina WISEWOMAN project. Prev Med. 2002;35:1–6. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dietzel R, Reisshauer A, Jahr S, Calafiore D, Armbrecht G. Body composition in lipoedema of the legs using dual-energy-X-ray-absorptiometry – a case control study. Br J Dermatol. 2015;1:13697. Google Scholar
Wiklund P, Toss F, Weinehall L, Hallmans G, Franks PW, Nordstrom A, et al. Abdominal and gynoid fat mass are associated with cardiovascular risk factors in men and women. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2008;93:4360–6. PubMedCrossrefGoogle Scholar
Allen EV, Hines EA. Lipedema of the legs: a syndrome characterised by fat legs and orthostatic edema. Proc Staff Meet Mayo Clin. 1940;15:184–7. Google Scholar
Herbst KL, Bramblette S. Lipedema and obesity. In: Your Weight Matters. Online: Obesity Action Coalition; 2014. Google Scholar
Mekki N, Christofilis MA, Charbonnier M, Atlan-Gepner C, Defoort C, Juhel C, et al. Influence of obesity and body fat distribution on postprandial lipemia and triglyceride-rich lipoproteins in adult women. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1999;84:184–91. PubMedGoogle Scholar
Statistics NCfH. Health, United States, 2016: with Chartbook on long-term trends in health. Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics (US); 2017. Google Scholar
Bramblette S. Breaking Bias. In: Talks T, ed. TEDxNSU: YouTube; 2015. Google Scholar
Overcoming Fat Bias from Your Doctors. What can patients do to be taken seriously by their doctor. Salt Lake City, Utah, USA: Fat Disorders Research Society; 2017. Google Scholar
Tinkle B, Castori M, Berglund B, Cohen H, Grahame R, Kazkaz H, et al. Hypermobile Ehlers-Danlos syndrome (a.k.a. Ehlers-Danlos syndrome Type III and Ehlers-Danlos syndrome hypermobility type): clinical description and natural history. Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet. 2017;175:48–69. CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Erlich C, Iker E, Herbst KL, Kahn LA, Sears DD, Kenyon M. Lymphedema and Lipedema Nutrition Guide. Foods, vitamins, minerals, and supplements. San Francisco: Lymph Notes; 2015. Google Scholar
Kraus RH. All about lipedema. Lymphe Gesundheit. 2015;2015:1–9. Google Scholar
Stutz JJ. Liposuction in lipedema to prevent later joint complications. Vasomed. 2011;23:6. Google Scholar
L’Hermitte F, Behar A, Paries J, Cohen-Boulakia F, Attali JR, Valensi P. Impairment of lymphatic function in women with gynoid adiposity and swelling syndrome. Metabolism. 2003;52:805–9. PubMedGoogle Scholar
Coppel T, Cunneen J, Fetzer S, Gordon K, Hardy D, Jones J. Best Practice Guidelines: The management of lipoedema Vol. 13. Wounds UK. http://www.wounds-uk.com/best-practice-statements/best-practice-guidelines-the-management-of-lipoedema 2017. Accessed December 30, 2017.
Junghaenel DU, Christodoulou C, Lai JS, Stone AA. Demographic correlates of fatigue in the US general population: results from the patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS) initiative. J Psychosom Res. 2011;71:117–23. PubMedCrossrefGoogle Scholar
Freidin MB, Wells HR, Potter T, Livshits G, Menni C, Williams FM. Metabolomic markers of fatigue: association between circulating metabolome and fatigue in women with chronic widespread pain. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2018;1864:601–6. PubMedCrossrefGoogle Scholar
Theoharides TC, Stewart JM, Hatziagelaki E, Kolaitis G. Brain ‘fog,” inflammation and obesity: key aspects of neuropsychiatric disorders improved by luteolin. Front Neurosci. 2015;9:225. PubMedGoogle Scholar
Herbst KL, Ussery C, Eekema A. Pilot study: whole body manual subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT) therapy improved pain and SAT structure in women with lipedema. Horm Mol Biol Clin Investig 2017. DOI: . CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Baumgartner A, Hueppe M, Schmeller W. Long-term benefit of liposuction in patients with lipoedema.A follow-up study after an average of 4 and 8 years. Br J Dermatol. 2015;17:14289. Google Scholar
Szolnoky G, Borsos B, Barsony K, Balogh M, Kemeny L. Complete decongestive physiotherapy with and without pneumatic compression for treatment of lipedema: a pilot study. Lymphology. 2008;41:40–4. PubMedGoogle Scholar
Portillo-Soto A, Eberman LE, Demchak TJ, Peebles C. Comparison of blood flow changes with soft tissue mobilization and massage therapy. J Altern Complement Med. 2014;20:932–6. CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Strunk RG, Pfefer MT, Dube D. Multimodal chiropractic care of pain and disability for a patient diagnosed with benign joint hypermobility syndrome: a case report. J Chiropr Med. 2014;13:35–42. CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Online erschienen: 09.03.2018
Funding Source: National Institutes of Health
Award identifier / Grant number: RL5GM118969, TL4GM 118971 and UL1GM118970
This study was funded by a gift from the Lipedema Foundation which played no role in the study design or collection, analyses and interpretation of data. Victoria Rosas was supported by the National Institute of General Medical Sciences of the National Institutes of Health under linked Award Numbers RL5GM118969, TL4GM 118971 and UL1GM118970, Funder Id: 10.13039/100000002. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.
Conflict of interest: None of the authors declare a conflict of interest.
Informed consent: A waiver of consent for access to Banner health records for this study was received by University of Arizona Human Subjects Protection Program.
Ethical approval: The research related to human use complied with all the relevant national regulations and institutional policies and was performed in accordance with the tenets of the Helsinki Declaration and has been approved by the University of Arizona Human Subjects Protection Program.