Mgx-Zn1-x-Fe2O4 nanoparticles were successfully synthesized using co-precipitation technique. The concentration effect on crystal structure, crystal size, volume of the unit cell, density of the unit cell, lattice parameters and microstructures of the produced spinel ferrites was elaborated from XRD spectra and SEM micrographs. XRD spectra of Mgx-Zn1-x-Fe2O4 powders are shown in Figure 2. These spectra confirmed the formation of ferrite phases in the identified crystal structures. Sharp diffraction peaks, consistent with the face centered cubic spinel structure, were noticed in XRD patterns of the investigated samples. The lattice parameter ‘a’ was determined using the relation ‘a=d2(h2 + k2 + l2)1/2ʹ whereas X-ray density of the ferrite samples was determined using the formula ‘D=8M/Na3ʹ. In density relation, ‘M’ is the molecular weight, ‘N’ is the Avogadro’s number and ’a’ is the lattice constant of the sample. The crystal size of the ferrite samples was determined by considering the most intense diffraction peaks in XRD spectra. In this study, the Debye-Scherrer formula (T=0.9 λ/βCosθ) was used to calculate the crystal size of the tested samples. The volume of the unit cell of the synthesized samples was calculated using the respective lattice constant values. A relationship between the volume and the lattice constant existed in the form ‘V=a3ʹ.
Figure 2: XRD patterns of pure Fe2O3, MgO and ZnO.
In Figure 2, XRD patterns of MgO, ZnO and α-Fe2O3 showed only the individual reflections of the starting phase of ZnO, MgO and α-Fe2O3. However, in Mgx-Zn1-x-Fe2O4, the major ferrite phase was seen along with a small amount of α-Fe2O3 phase, which remained unreacted [22]. In Figure 3, the broad width of the peaks revealed the growth of the ferrite phase with very small particle size. The intensity ratios of the individual reflections were in accordance with the stoichiometric composition of the mixture. The particle size reduced down sharply with an increase in peak width. The content of ZnO decreased quickly and became zero with an increase in milling time and concentration [23], whereas the α-Fe2O3 content exhibited slow decrease over milling time.
Figure 3: XRD patterns of calcined and uncalcined samples of Mgx Zn1-xFe2O4 ferrite.
Peaks at 2θ of 30.55°, 35.98°, 37.52°, 43.58°, 57.66° and 63.32° were referred to XRD diffraction planes (220), (311), (222), (400), (333) and (440), respectively. These peaks confirmed the formation of cubic spinel nickel copper ferrite when compared with JCPDS card 070–2674. XRD results of calcined sample of Mgx Zn1-x Fe2O4 confirmed the ferrite phase formation with the Bragg’s angles of 31.9°, 35.7°, 36.3°, 54.2° and 56.8°. Then sample was calcined at temperature of 600 °C for one hour in a furnace for comparative phase transition studies. Five out of seven peaks revealed 71 % purity of calcined Mg0.1Zn0.9Fe2O4 ferrite and 43 % purity of uncalcined ferrite. The peaks at 35.7°, 36.4° and 62.8°, as observed in MgxZn1-xFe2O4 at x=0.3, 0.7, 0.75, 0.9, revealed that the ferrite phase dominates after calcination. The maximum purity of the sample was measured about 57 % while uncalcined sample revealed relatively lower purity of 43 %. It was due to accumulation of the energy during ball milling through repeated fragmentation and rewelding of the small grains, which led to formation of Mg–Zn ferrite phase. This phenomenon can be manifested during contraction or expansion of the lattice parameters of the above discussed phases [24].
Other phases have also been presented with the Bragg’s angles of 24.2°, 33.3°, 41.0°, 49.5°, 62.6° and 64.1°, which were removed by increasing the milling time [25]. Due to high-energy impact, lattice parameter of MgO, ZnO and Fe2O3 phases came down to nanometric order within a very short duration of milling. It indicates that contamination in the sample, produced by the ball milling, was heterogeneous in nature [26]. All MgxZn1-xFe2O4 structures, obtained with concentrations of 0.1, 0.3, 0.7, 0.75, 0.9, exhibited FCC geometry [27]. The crystal size of the ferrite samples was determined by considering the most intense diffraction peak (311) in XRD patterns. In this study, the Debye-Scherrer formula was used to calculate the crystal size of the tested samples. The average crystal sizes were measured as 34, 54, 49, 40 and 45 nm whereas the average lattice parameter remained as 0.8 nm for all concentrations, as shown in Figure 4. The X-ray density was found in the range of 5.3–4.6 g/cm3.
Figure 4: Volume, lattice parameter, density and crystal size vs concentration of the MgXZn1-xFe2O3 of calcined (red) and uncalcined (black).
A decreasing trend in crystallite size of the synthesized ferrite particles was found with an increase in concentration from 0.3 to 0.9. On increasing the value of ‘x’, Mg2+ ions in the sample and crystal size were also increased [28]. An increase in Mg2+ ions could be attributed to the ionic size difference, since the unit cell had to expand when substituted by ions with large ionic sizes. Zn2+ ions had larger ionic radius (0.82 Å) than Mg2+ ions (0.66 Å), which when substituted reside on A-site and displaced small Fe3+ ions from A-site to B-site. MgO and ZnO were cold welded during mechanical milling and finally the crystal size was further reduced due to heating at 600 °C. The atoms were diffused and replaced by the other atoms, which have smaller ionic radii like Mg2+. This replacement resulted in a decrease in crystal size [28].
An increasing trend has been found in lattice parameter of ionic crystals of uncalcined samples with an increase in concentration from 0.1 to 0.7. On the other hand, a sudden decrease in lattice parameter has been observed between 0.7 and 1. This initial increment and then decrease of the crystallite size value is attributed to the well-known fracturing (reduction) and re-welding (increment) processes that happen usually in high energy ball milling. Thermal heat treatment at 600 °C for one hour grew the ferrite phase with a very high value of lattice parameter [29].
The X-ray density was decreased with an increase in concentration. This decrease in density was attributed to a continuous reduction in α-Fe2O3 phase content at a moderate rate during the course of milling. X-ray density of normal spinel was relatively larger than uncalcined sample and reduced slowly in the course of calcination; trend line also explained decreasing behavior. X-ray density of uncalcined samples showed a continuous behavior between concentrations of 0.1 and 0.3. Such variations in X-ray density with increasing concentration clearly indicate that if the lattice parameter increases the X-ray density will decrease [30]. The volume of these newly grown ionic crystals in the calcined sample increases with a rise in concentration from 0.1 to 0.7. After value of 0.7 lattice parameter was suddenly dropped down and this initial reduction and then increment in the particle size is attributed to the well-known fracturing (reduction) and re-welding (increment) process that happens usually in high energy ball milling. When the sample was placed in the furnace at 600 °C, the ferrite phase grew and the value of the lattice parameter decreased. The plots in Figure 4 show that in the uncalcined sample, the ferrite phase grows with a very high value of lattice parameter and then drops due to ball milling [31].
Calcined ferrite samples were also analyzed by SEM technique for evaluation of their microstructures and grain size. Figure 5 shows the SEM micrographs of calcined samples: (a) Mg0.1 Zn0.9Fe2O4., (b) Mg0.3Zn0.7Fe2O4, (c) Mg0.7 Zn0.3Fe2O4, and (d) Mg0.9 Zn0.1Fe2O4. It can be observed that all the samples exhibit different grain sizes but similar grain shape. The grains are homogenously distributed. The grain size was calculated by the line intercept method and found in the range of 0.5–2 mµ, depending on the contents into the spinel lattice [32]. Moreover, the grain size was found larger and homogenous for the ferrites, substituted with MgO and ZnO. These results are in line with XRD data where the lattice parameter values increased with increasing MgO and ZnO contents and produced larger unit cell volumes for the substituted samples. Similar types of results have been reported in literature for rare earth substituted spinel ferrites [32, 33].
Figure 5: SEM images of calcined samples: (a) Mg0.1 Zn0.9Fe2O4, (b) Mg0.3Zn0.7Fe2O4, (c) Mg0.7 Zn0.3Fe2O4, and (d) Mg0.9 Zn0.1Fe2O4 with scale bar of 2 µm.
Comments (0)