Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Journal of Human Kinetics

The Journal of Academy of Physical Education in Katowice

4 Issues per year

IMPACT FACTOR 2016: 0.798
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 1.252

CiteScore 2016: 1.16

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2016: 0.483
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2016: 0.792

Open Access
See all formats and pricing
More options …
Just Accepted


The Effect 0f Warm-up on Tethered Front Crawl Swimming Forces

Henrique Neiva
  • Department of Sport Sciences, University of Beira Interior (UBI), Covilhã, Portugal
  • Research Centre in Sports Sciences, Health and Human Development (CIDESD), Vila Real, Portugal
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
/ Pedro Morouço
  • Polytechnic Institute of Leiria, Research Center for Human Movement Sciences (IPL), Leiria, Portugal
  • Research Centre in Sports Sciences, Health and Human Development (CIDESD), Vila Real, Portugal
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
/ António Silva
  • Department of Sport Sciences, Exercise and Health, University of Trás-os-Montes and Alto Douro (UTAD), Vila Real, Portugal
  • Research Centre in Sports Sciences, Health and Human Development (CIDESD), Vila Real, Portugal
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
/ Mário Marques / Daniel Marinho
  • Department of Sport Sciences, University of Beira Interior (UBI), Covilhã, Portugal
  • Research Centre in Sports Sciences, Health and Human Development (CIDESD), Vila Real, Portugal
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
Published Online: 2011-10-04 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/v10078-011-0066-1

The Effect 0f Warm-up on Tethered Front Crawl Swimming Forces

This study was conducted to determine the effect of warm-up on high-intensity front crawl tethered swimming and thus to better understand possible variations in the force exerted by the swimmers. Ten male national level swimmers (mean ± SD; age 15.3 ± 0.95 years old, height: 1.73 ± 5.2 m, body mass: 64.3 ± 7.8 kg, Fat mass 8.31 ± 3.1 kg) participated in this study. After a typical competition warm-up, the subjects performed a 30 s tethered swimming all-out effort in front crawl swimming technique. The same test was repeated in the day after but performed without warming up. Capillary blood lactate concentration was assessed before and after the swimming test and the Borg ratings of perceived exertion scale was used. Without a previous warm-up, the mean ± SD values of maximum and mean forces were 299.62 ± 77.56 N and 91.65 ± 14.70 N, respectively. These values were different (p<0.05) from the values obtained with warm-up (351.33 ± 81.85 N and 103.97 ± 19.11 N). Differences were also observed when regarding to the forces relative to body mass. However, the values of lactate net concentrations after the test performed with and without warm-up were not different (6.27 ± 2.36 mmol·l-1 and 6.18 ± 2.353 mmol·l-1) and the same occurs with the values of ratings of perceived exertion (15.90 ± 2.42 and 15.60 ± 2.27). These results suggest an improvement of the maximum and mean force of the swimmer on the tethered swimming due to previous warm-up.

Keywords: evaluation; strength; performance; lactate; perceived exertion

  • Andzel WD. One mile run performance as a function of prior exercise. J Sports Med Phys Fitness, 1982; 22: 80-84Google Scholar

  • Asmussen E, Boje O. Body temperature and capacity for work. Acta Physiol Scand, 1945; 10: 1-22CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Atkinson G, Todd C, Reilly TP, Waterhouse J. Dirunal variation in cycling performance: influence of warm up. J Sports Sci, 2005; 23(3): 321-329CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Beedle BB, Mann CL A comparison of two warm-ups joint range of motion. J Strength Cond Res, 2007; 21(3): 776-779PubMedGoogle Scholar

  • Bishop D, Bonetti D, Dawson B. The influence of three different warm up intensities on sprint kayak performance in trained athletes. Med Sci Sports Exerc, 2001; 33 (6): 1026-1032CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bishop D. Warm Up l: Potential mechanisms and the effects of passive warm-up on exercise performance. Sports Med, 2003; 33: 439-54CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Borg G. Borg's perceived exertion and pain scales. Champaign, Illinois: Human Kinetics, 1983Google Scholar

  • Bruyn-Prevost P, Lefebvre F. The effects of various warming up intensities and durations during a short maximal anaerobic exercise. Eur J Appl Physiol, 1980; 43:101-107CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Burnley M, Doust JH, Jones AM. Effects of prior heavy exercise, prior sprint exercise and passive warming on oxygen uptake kinetics during heavy exercise in human. Eur J Appl Physiol, 2002; 87: 424-32CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar

  • Cavagna GA. Effect of temperature and velocity of stretching on stress relaxation of contracting frog muscle fibres. J Physiol, 1993; 462: 161-173Google Scholar

  • Clarys JP. Human morphology and hydrodynamics. In J Terauds, & EW Bedinfield (Eds.), Swimming III, 1979: 3-41Google Scholar

  • Costill DL, King DS, Holdren A, Hargreaves M. Sprint speed vs. swimming power. Swimming Tech, 1983; 20(1): 20-22Google Scholar

  • Costill DL, Rayfield F, Kirwan J, Thomas R. A computer based system for the measurement of force and power during front crawl swimming. J Swimming Res, 1986; 2: 16-19Google Scholar

  • di Prampero PE, Ferretti G. The energetics of anaerobic muscle metabolism: a reappraisal of older and recent concepts. Respir Physiol, 1999; 1(118): 10-15Google Scholar

  • Febbraio MA, Carey MF, Snow RJ, Stathis CG, Hargreaves M. Influence of elevated muscle temperature on metabolism during intense exercise. Am J Physiol, 1996; 271: R1251-R1255Google Scholar

  • Filho DM, Denadai BS. Mathematical basis for modeling swimmer power output in the front crawl tethered swimming: an application to aerobic evaluation. The Open Sports Sciences Journal, 2008; 1: 31-37Google Scholar

  • Fradkin AJ, Zazryn TR, Smoliga, JM. Effects of warming-up on physical performance: a systematic review with meta-analysis. J Strength Cond Res, 2010; 24(1): 140-148PubMedCrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Garrido N, Marinho DA, Barbosa TM, Costa AM, Silva AJ, Pérez-Turpin JA, Marques MC. Relationships between dry land strength, power variables and short sprint performance in young competitive swimmers. J Hum Sport Exerc, 2010; 5(2): 240-249CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Keskinen KL. Evaluation of technique performances in freestyle swimming. Kinesiology, 1997; 2(1): 30-38Google Scholar

  • Keskinen KL. Measurement of technique in front crawl swimming. Med Sport Sci, 1994; 39: 117-125Google Scholar

  • Magel JR. Propelling force measured during tethered swimming in the four competitive swimming styles. Res Quart, 1970; 41(1): 68-74Google Scholar

  • Mandengue SH, Seck D, Bishop D, Cisse F, Tsala-Mbala P, Ahmaid S. Are Athletes able to self-select their optimal warm up? J Sci Med Sports, 2005; 8: 26-34CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Marinho DA, Barbosa TM, Reis VM, Kjendlie PL, Alves FB, Vilas-Boas JP, Machado L, Silva AJ, Rouboa AI. Swimming propulsion forces are enhanced by a small finger spread. J Appl Biomech, 2010; 26: 87-92PubMedGoogle Scholar

  • McCutcheon LJ, Geor RJ, Hinchcliff KW. Effects of prior exercise on muscle metabolism during sprint exercise in humans. J Appl Physiol, 1999; 87(5): 1914-1922Google Scholar

  • Mitchell JB, Huston JS. The effect of high- and low-intensity warm-up on the physiological responses to a standardised swim and tethered swimming performance. J Sports Sci, 1993; 11: 159-165CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Morouço P, Keskinen KL, Vilas-Boas JP, Fernandes RJ. Relationship between tethered forces and the four swimming techniques performance. J Appl Biomech, 2011; 27(2): 161-169PubMedGoogle Scholar

  • Poprzęcki S, Zając A, Wower B, Cholewa J. The effects of a warm-up and the recovery interval prior to exercise on anaerobic power and acid-base balance in man. J Human Kinetics, 2007; 18: 15-28Google Scholar

  • Sale DG. Postactivation potentiation: role in human performance. Exerc Sports Sci Rev, 2002; 30:138-143CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Smith CA. The warm-up procedure: To stretch or not to stretch. A brief review. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther, 2004; 19: 12-17Google Scholar

  • Smith DJ, Norris SR, Hogg JM. Performance evaluation of swimmers: scientific tools. Sport Med, 2002; 32: 539-554CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Stager JM, Coyle MA. Energy systems. In J. Stager, & D. Tanner (Eds.), Swimming - Handbook of Sports Medicine and Science. Massachusetts: Blackwell Science, 2005: 1-19Google Scholar

  • Wright V, Johns RJ. Quantitative and qualitative analysis of joint stiffness in normal subjects and in patients with connective tissue disease. Ann Rheum Dis, 1961; 20: 36-46PubMedCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Yeater RA, Martin RB, White MK, Gilson KH. Tethered swimming forces in the crawl, breast and back strokes and their relationship to competitive performance. J Biomech, 1981; 14(8): 527-537.PubMedCrossrefGoogle Scholar

About the article

Published Online: 2011-10-04

Published in Print: 2011-09-01

Citation Information: Journal of Human Kinetics, Volume 29A, Issue Special Issue, Pages 113–119, ISSN (Online) 1899-7562, ISSN (Print) 1640-5544, DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/v10078-011-0066-1.

Export Citation

This content is open access.

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in