Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Journal of Human Kinetics

The Journal of Academy of Physical Education in Katowice

4 Issues per year


IMPACT FACTOR 2016: 0.798
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 1.252

CiteScore 2016: 1.16

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2016: 0.483
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2016: 0.792

Open Access
Online
ISSN
1899-7562
See all formats and pricing
More options …
Volume 37, Issue 1 (Jun 2013)

Issues

Kinematic and Kinetic Analysis of Two Gymnastics Acrobatic Series to Performing the Backward Stretched Somersault

Dr. Bessem Mkaouer
  • Corresponding author
  • Department of Sports and Physical Activities, Higher Institute of Sport and Physical Education of Ksar Saïd, 2011 Manouba, Tunisia. Phone.: + 216 – 23 066716; Fax: + 216 – 71 220121
  • Email
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
/ Monèm Jemni / Samiha Amara
  • Higher Institute of Sport and Physical Education of Ksar Saïd, Univercity of Manouba, Tunisia
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
/ Helmi Chaabène
  • Higher Institute of Sport and Physical Education of Ksar Saïd, Univercity of Manouba, Tunisia
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
/ Zouhair Tabka
Published Online: 2013-07-05 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/hukin-2013-0021

Back swing connections during gymnastics acrobatic series considerably influence technical performance and difficulties, particularly in the back somersault. The aim of this study was to compare the take-off’s kinetic and kinematic variables between two acrobatic series leading to perform the backward stretched somersault (also called salto): round-off, flic-flac to stretched salto versus round-off, tempo-salto to stretched salto. Five high level male gymnasts (age 23.17 ± 1.61 yrs; body height 1.65 ± 0.05 m; body mass 56.80 ± 7.66 kg) took part in this investigation. A force plate synchronized with a two dimensional movement analysis system was used to collect kinetic and kinematic data. Statistical analysis via the non-parametric Wilcoxon Rank-sum test showed significant differences between the take-offs’ variables. The backswing connections were different in the take-off angle, linear momentum, vertical velocity and horizontal and vertical displacements. In conclusion, considering that the higher elevation of the centre of mass in the flight phase would allow best performance and lower the risk of falls, particularly when combined to a great angular momentum, this study demonstrated that the optimal connection series was round-off, flic-flac to stretched salto which enabled the best height in the somersault. Analysis of the results suggests that both connections facilitate the performance of single and double (or triple) backward somersaults with or without rotations around the longitudinal axis. Gymnasts could perform these later while gaining height if they chose the round-off, flic-flac technique or gaining some backward displacement if they choose the round-off, salto tempo.

Keywords: motion analysis; take-off; flic-flac; tempo salto

  • Bardy BG, Laurent M. How do somersaulters control their moment of inertia during flight? Journal of Sportand Exercise Physiology, 1994; 16: 28Google Scholar

  • Bini RR, Senger D, Lanferdini F, Lopes AL. Joint kinematics assessment during cycling incremental test to exhaustion. Isokinetics and Exercise science Journal, 2012; 20: 99-105Google Scholar

  • Boloban W, Sadowski J, Wisniowski W, Mastalerz A, Niznikowski T. Kinematic structure of double salto backward stretched performed with stable landing and in combination with salto tempo. ResearchYearbook, Medsportpress, 2007; 13(1): 104-107Google Scholar

  • Brüggemann GP. Kinematics and Kinetics of the backward somersault take-off from the floor. In H. Matsui & K. Kobayashi Eds. Biomechanics VIII-B. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics, 1983; 793-800Google Scholar

  • Brüggemann GP. Biomechanics of gymnastic techniques. Sport Science Review, 1994; 3: 79-120Google Scholar

  • Cuk I, Ferkolj MS. Kinematic analysis of some backward acrobatic jumps. In: Proceedings of the 18thInternational Symposium on Biomechanics in Sports; 2000Google Scholar

  • De Leva P. Adjustments to zatsiorsky-seluyanov’s segment inertia parameters. Journal of Biomechanics, 1996; 29(9): 1223-1230CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Faul F, Erdfelder E. GPOWER: A Priori, Post-Hoc, and Compromise Power Analyses for MS-DOS (ComputerProgram). Bonn, FRG: Bonn University, Department of Psychology; 2004Google Scholar

  • Geiblinger H, Morrison WE, McLaughlin PA. Take-off characteristics of double back somersaults on the floor. In: Proceedings of the 13th International Symposium on Biomechanics in Sports; 1995Google Scholar

  • Halawish AMT. Kinematics of the Mawashi Shoudan Kick as a Parameter of Designing a Training Program for Karate Juniors. World Journal of Sport Sciences, 2011; 5(4): 237-244Google Scholar

  • Hraski Z. Correlation between selected kinematic parameters and angular momentum in backward somersaults. In: Proceedings of the 20th International Symposium on Biomechanics in Sports. Cilceres, Extremadura, 2002; 167-170Google Scholar

  • Hraski Z, Mejovsek M. Production of Angular Momentum for Backward Somersault. In: Hamza MM. (Eds), Biomechanics, Proceedings of the symposium biomech, 2004; 463Google Scholar

  • Huang C, Hsu GS. Biomechanical analysis of gymnastic back handspring. In: Proceedings of the 27thInternational Conference on Biomechanics in Sports; 2009Google Scholar

  • Hwang I, Seo G, Liu ZG. Take-off mechanics of the double backward somersault. International Journal of SportBiomechanics, 1990; 6: 177-186Google Scholar

  • Kerwin DG, Webb J, Yeadon MR. Production of angular momentum in double backward somersaults. In: Proceedings of the 16th International Symposium on Biomechanics in Sports; 1998Google Scholar

  • Knoll K. The biomechanical chain of effect in flight elements of preparatory movements and implication for round-off and flick-flack technique. In: Proceedings of the 1st International Conference “Biomechanicsin Gymnastics”. Cologne, Strauss, 1992; 116-125Google Scholar

  • Knoll K, Krug J. World Championships Artistic Gymnastics Stuttgart 1989, Scientific Report "Floor man and woman". In: International Gymnastics Federation, FIG (Eds.), Lausanne, Swiss, 1990; 43-58Google Scholar

  • McNitt-Gray JL. Impulse generation during jumping and landing movements. In: Proceedings of theBiomechanics Symposia. University of San Francisco, 2001; 95-99Google Scholar

  • McNitt-Gray JL, Munkasy B, Welch M. External reaction forces experienced by gymnasts during the take-off and landing of tumbling skills. Technique, 1994; 14(9): 10-16Google Scholar

  • McNitt-Gray JL, Requejo PS, Flashner H. Multijoint Control Strategies Transfer Between Tasks. BiologicalCybernetics, 2006; 94(6): 501-510Google Scholar

  • Mkaouer B, Jemni M, Amara S, Chaabèn H, Tabka Z. Kinematic and kinetic analysis of counter movement jump versus two different types of standing back somersaults. Sc Gym J., 2012; 4(3): 61-71Google Scholar

  • Nicolas G, Bideau B. A kinematic and dynamic comparison of surface and underwater displacement in high level monofin swimming. Human Movement Science, 2009; 28(4): 480-493CrossrefWeb of SciencePubMedGoogle Scholar

  • Sadowski J, Boloban W, Mastalerz A, Niznikowski T. Velocities and joint angles during double backward stretched salto performed with stable landing and in combination with tempo salto. Biology ofSport, 2009; 26(1): 87-101Google Scholar

  • Sadowski J, Boloban W, Wisniowski W, Mastalerz A, Niznikowski T. Key components of acrobatic jump. Biology of Sport, 2005; 22 (4): 387-395Google Scholar

  • Sands WA. Biomechanics for gymnastics. In: M. Jemni Eds. The Science of Gymnastics. Routledge, Francis and Taylor Grp. London, 2001; 55-104Google Scholar

  • Scanlan AT, Dascombe BJ, Reaburn PRJ. The construct and longitudinal validity of the basketball exercise simulation test. J Strength Cond. Res., 2012; 26: 523-530Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Sinclar PJ, Walker CA, Rickards T. Kinematic determinants of dive height in springboard diving. Movementand Sport Science, 2012; 1(57): 107-112Google Scholar

  • Smith JA. The back somersault takeoff - A biomechanics study. Carnegie Research Paper, 1983; 5: 31-39Google Scholar

About the article

Authors submitted their contribution of the article to the editorial board.Accepted for printing in Journal of Human Kinetics vol. 37/2013 on June 2013.


Published Online: 2013-07-05

Published in Print: 2013-06-01


Citation Information: Journal of Human Kinetics, ISSN (Online) 1899-7562, ISSN (Print) 1640-5544, DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/hukin-2013-0021.

Export Citation

This content is open access.

Citing Articles

Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.

[1]
Bessem Mkaouer, Monèm Jemni, Sarra Hammoudi-Nassib, Samiha Amara, and Helmi Chaabene
Sport Sciences for Health, 2017
[2]
Samiha Amara, Bessem Mkaouer, Sarra H. Nassib, Helmi Chaaben, Younes Hachana, and Fatma Z. Ben Salah
Advances in Physical Education, 2015, Volume 05, Number 04, Page 225

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in