Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Human Affairs

Postdisciplinary Humanities & Social Sciences Quarterly

Editor-in-Chief: Višnovský, Emil

Ed. by Bianchi, Gabriel / Hrubec, Marek / Tartaglia, James


CiteScore 2016: 0.33

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2016: 0.172
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2016: 0.415

Online
ISSN
1337-401X
See all formats and pricing
More options …
Volume 21, Issue 2

Issues

Culture, events, speech genres and stories

Peter Michalovič
Published Online: 2011-06-16 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/s13374-011-0012-x

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to interpret systematically M. M. Bakhtin’s views on genre. Although Aristotle was the first philosopher—and one of the first thinkers in general who focused on the issues of artistic and rhetorical genres, philosophy as such did not treat these issues for a considerably long time. One of the first philosophers who approached the genre issue within the larger context of the philosophy of language was Mikhail M. Bakhtin, a Russian philosopher and a literary scholar. As early as the 1920s he founded philosophical thinking on the so-called small speech genres, which later served as the basis for a remarkable theory of primary and secondary genres. Bakhtin is a world renowned theoretician on the novel, but his genre theory is nevertheless very topical, too, since it relates to issues focused on by philosophers much later.

Keywords: event; small speech genre; story; consummatedness; compositional procedures; architectural form

  • [1] Aristotle. (2000). Poetics. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press. Google Scholar

  • [2] Bakhtin, M./ Medvedev, P. (1985). The Formal Method in Literary Scholarship: A Critical Introduction to Sociological Poetics. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. Google Scholar

  • [3] Bakhtin, M. (1986). Speech Genres and Other Late Essays. Austin: University of Texas Press. Google Scholar

  • [4] Eco, U. (1984). Semiotics and the Philosophy of Language. Bloomington: Indiana University Press. Google Scholar

  • [5] Eco, U. (1994). Author’s Postscript. In The Name of the Rose. Fort Washington: Harvest Books. Google Scholar

  • [6] Foucault, M. (1981). The Order of Discourse. In R. Young (Ed.). Untying the Text. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 51–78. Google Scholar

  • [7] Foucault, M. (2002). The Archeology of Knowledge. London: Routledge. Google Scholar

  • [8] Frow, J. (2005). Genre. London and New York: Routledge. Google Scholar

  • [9] Lotman, J. M. (1977). The Structure of Artistic Text. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press. Google Scholar

  • [10] Lyotard, J.-F. (1988). The Différend. Phrases in Dispute. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota. Google Scholar

  • [11] Morris, P. (Ed.). (1994). The Bakhtin Reader. Selected Writings of Bakhtin, Medvedev and Voloshinov. London: Arnold. Google Scholar

  • [12] Todorov, T. (1978). Poétique de la prose. Paris: Éditions du Seuil. Google Scholar

  • [13] Turner, M. (1996). The Literary Mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar

  • [14] Veyne, P. (1984). Writing History. Middletown: Wesleyan University Press. Google Scholar

  • [15] Voloshinov, V. N. (1986). Marxism and the Philosophy of Language. Harvard: Harvard University Press. Google Scholar

  • [16] Young, R. (Ed.). (1981). Foucault, M.: The Order of Discourse. In Untying the Text: A Post-Structuralist Reader. London: Routledge. Google Scholar

About the article

Published Online: 2011-06-16

Published in Print: 2011-06-01


Citation Information: Human Affairs, Volume 21, Issue 2, Pages 98–107, ISSN (Online) 1337-401X, ISSN (Print) 1210-3055, DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/s13374-011-0012-x.

Export Citation

© 2011 Institute for Research in Social Communication, Slovak Academy of Sciences. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License. BY-NC-ND 3.0

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in