Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Human Affairs

Postdisciplinary Humanities & Social Sciences Quarterly

Editor-in-Chief: Višnovský, Emil

Ed. by Bianchi, Gabriel / Hrubec, Marek / Tartaglia, James


CiteScore 2016: 0.33

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2016: 0.172
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2016: 0.415

Online
ISSN
1337-401X
See all formats and pricing
More options …
Volume 21, Issue 2

Issues

Two cultures

Miroslav Marcelli
  • Department of Philosophy and History of Philosophy Faculty of Arts, Comenius University, Gondova 2, 818 01, Bratislava, Slovakia
  • Email
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
Published Online: 2011-06-16 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/s13374-011-0013-9

Abstract

This paper begins by considering the specific position of philosophy on culture: philosophy is part of culture as well as being a reflection of the whole complex. Thus, culture finds in philosophy its own meta-cultural account. One of the results achieved by this philosophical approach might be the diagnosis of the cultural split and the symptoms of anthropological regress. On the other hand, the example of Michel de Certeau’s work shows us that from this point of view it is possible to develop philosophical anthropology as a performative discipline, studying the activities of transformation, and appropriation at the level of everyday life. This anthropological approach leads us to an awareness of the principal openness of the cultural field and even to a new understanding of balkanization.

Keywords: culture; philosophy; aestheticisation; anthropology; urban space

  • [1] Berlin, I. (2000). Three Critics of the Enlightenment: Vico, Hammann, Herder. London: Henry Hardy. Google Scholar

  • [2] Bogdanovic, B. (2002). Vom Glück in den Städten. Wien: Zsolnay Verlag. Google Scholar

  • [3] Certeau, M. de. (1984). The Practice of Everyday Life. Berkeley: University of California Press. Google Scholar

  • [4] Horkheimer, M., Adorno, Th. W. (2002). Dialectic of Enlightenment. Philosophical Fragments. Stanford: Stanford University Press. Google Scholar

  • [5] Lévi-Strauss, Cl. (1963). Structural Anthropology. New York: Basic Books. Google Scholar

  • [6] Mongin, O. (2005). La condition urbaine. Paris: Seuil. Google Scholar

  • [7] Portzamparc, CH. De. (2002). Âge III, la ville ouverte. Urbanisme, no 324, 18–26. Google Scholar

  • [8] Ruskin, J. (1854). Lectures on Architecture and Painting. Delivered at Edinburgh in November 1853. In The Complete Works of John Ruskin. Volume X. New York: John Wiley. Google Scholar

  • [9] Veyne, P. (1988). Did the Greeks Believe in their Myths? An Essay on Constitutive Imagination. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar

About the article

Published Online: 2011-06-16

Published in Print: 2011-06-01


Citation Information: Human Affairs, Volume 21, Issue 2, Pages 108–118, ISSN (Online) 1337-401X, ISSN (Print) 1210-3055, DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/s13374-011-0013-9.

Export Citation

© 2011 Institute for Research in Social Communication, Slovak Academy of Sciences. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License. BY-NC-ND 3.0

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in