Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Human Affairs

Postdisciplinary Humanities & Social Sciences Quarterly

Editor-in-Chief: Višnovský, Emil

Ed. by Bianchi, Gabriel / Hrubec, Marek / Tartaglia, James

CiteScore 2018: 0.26

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.288
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 0.221

See all formats and pricing
More options …
Volume 23, Issue 2


The electoral fate and policy impact of “anti-corruption parties” in Central and Eastern Europe

Andreas Bågenholm
  • Quality of Government Institute Department of Political Science/Statsvetenskapliga institutionen, University of Gothenburg/ Göteborgs universitet, Box 711, SE-405 30, Gothenburg, Sweden
  • Email
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
Published Online: 2013-03-28 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/s13374-013-0118-4


Niche parties have been increasingly successful during the last 30 years and have accordingly received a lot of scholarly attention. So far most of the focus has been on Green and radical right parties, and to a more limited extent, regional parties. In this paper I analyze the electoral fates and policy outcomes of another type of niche party, namely those focusing on anti-corruption, whose successes culminated during the 2000s. The study is limited to all new parties campaigning on the issue of anti-corruption in Central and Eastern Europe since the fall of the Berlin wall and the questions to be answered are: To what extent are these parties successful in obtaining relevant positions in the government so that they are able to effectively fight corruption? What impact do they have on anti-corruption measures, thereby influencing the level of corruption? How successful are these parties in the elections that follow? In short, to what extent do anticorruption parties matter? Apart from electoral and governmental data, the analysis is based on the Freedom House Nation in Transit annual reports, in which one section deals with the efforts to curb corruption. The results are rather mixed, but indicate that the more influential positions the anti-corruption parties (ACPs) have in government, the better are their anti-corruption performances. That implies that they are serious and competent enough to tackle those issues, despite their newness and lack of experience. Not surprisingly, the incumbent ACPs fare worse than those in opposition in subsequent elections, but quite a few still remain popular. Finally, all but one party abandoned their anti-corruption rhetoric in their second election, which implies that anti-corruption is a different type of issue, compared to the ones used by previous niche parties.

Keywords: political parties; anti-corruption; Central and Eastern Europe

  • [1] Bennich-Björkman, Li, Bågenholm, A., Johansson Heinö, A. (2012). Civilizing Politics: A New Road to Electoral Success. Elite Strategies and the Emergence of New Political Parties in Post-communist Europe. Manuscript under review. Google Scholar

  • [2] Bågenholm, A. (2009). Politicizing Corruption. The Electoral Impact of Anti-Corruption Discourse in Europe 1983–2007. QoG Working Paper Series 2009, 10. Quality of Government Institute, University of Gothenburg. Google Scholar

  • [3] Bågenholm, A. (2010). Politicizing Corruption. The Electoral Effects of Anti-Corruption Rhetoric in Europe 1983–2007. Paper presented at the 2010 Annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, September 2–5, 2010. Google Scholar

  • [4] de Lange, Sarah L. (2008). From Pariah to Power: The Government Participation of Radical Right-Wing Populist Parties in West European Democracies. University of Antwerp. Google Scholar

  • [5] Dimock, M. A., Jacobson, G. C. (1995). Checks and Choices: The House Bank Scandal’s Impact on Voters in 1992. Journal of Politics 57, No. 4. Google Scholar

  • [6] Drummond, A. J. (2006). Electoral Volatility and Party Decline in Western Democracies: 1970–1995. Political Studies 54, 628–647. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.2006.00617.xCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [7] Green, J. (2007). When Voters and Parties Agree: Valence Issues and Party Competition. Political Studies 55, 629–655. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.2007.00671.xCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [8] Hug, S. (2001). Altering Party Systems. Strategic Behavior and the Emergence of New Political Parties in Western Democracies. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press. Google Scholar

  • [9] Kosiara-Pedersen, K. (2012). The 2012 Danish Parliamentary Election: A Very New Government. West European Politics 35, 415–424. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2011.648015CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • [10] Lane, Jan-Erik, Ersson, S. O. (1994). Politics and Society in Western Europe. London: Sage. Google Scholar

  • [11] Lipset, S. M., Rokkan, S. (Eds.) (1967). Cleavage Structures, Party Systems, and Voter Alignments: An Introduction. In S.M. Lipset, S. Rokkan (Eds.). Party Systems and Voter Alignments: Cross-National Perspectives. New York: The Free Press. Google Scholar

  • [12] Mair, P., Müller, W. C., Plasser, F. (2004). Introduction: Electoral Challenges and Party Responses”. In P. Mair (Ed.). Political Parties and Electoral Change: Party Responses to Electoral Markets). London: Sage. Google Scholar

  • [13] Meguid, B. (2008). Party Competition between Unequals: Strategies and Electoral Fortunes in Western Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511510298CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [14] Miller, B., Meyer, T. (2011). To the Core of the Niche Party: Conceptual Clarity and Valid Measurement for a Much Employed Concept. Unpublished manuscript. Google Scholar

  • [15] Minkenberg, M. (2001). The Radical Right in Public Office: Agenda-Setting and Policy Effects. West European Politics 24, 1–21. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01402380108425462CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [16] Müller-Rommel, F. et al. (2004). Party Government in Central Eastern European Democracies: A Data Collection (1990–2003). European Journal of Political Research 43, 869–893. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.0304-4130.2004.00178.xCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [17] Nation in Transit. Country Reports 2003–2010. Freedom House (www.freedomhouse.org). Google Scholar

  • [18] Pennings, P., Lane, Jan-Erik (1998). Introduction. In P. Pennings, Jan-Erik Lane (Eds.). Comparing Party System Change. London & New York: Routledge. Google Scholar

  • [19] Persson, A., Rothstein, Bo, Teorell, J. (forthcoming in Governance). Why Anti-Corruption Reforms Fail — Systemic Corruption as a Collective Action Problem. Google Scholar

  • [20] Peters, J. G., Welch, S. (1980). The Effects of Charges of Corruption on Voting Behavior in Congressional Elections. The American Political Science Review 74, No. 3. Google Scholar

  • [21] Pogunkte, T. (2002). Green Parties in National Government from Protest to Acquiescence? In F. Müller-Rommel, T. Pogunkte (Eds.). Green Parties in National Governments. London: Frank Cass. Google Scholar

  • [22] Pop-Eleches, G. (2010). Throwing out the Bums. Protest Voting and Unorthodox Parties after Communism. World Politics 62, 221–260. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0043887110000043Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [23] Rihoux, B., Rüdig, W. (2006). Analyzing Greens in Power: Setting the Agenda. European Journal of Political Research 45, 1–33. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6765.2005.00288.xCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [24] Rothstein, Bo (2011). The Quality of Government. Chicago & London: The University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar

  • [25] Sikk, A. (2011). Newness as a Winning Formula for New Political Parties. Party Politics, published online 21 March 2011. Transparency International (www.transparency.org) Google Scholar

  • [26] Wagner, M. (2011). Defining and Measuring Niche Parties. Party Politics, published online 18 May 2011. Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • [27] Welch, S., Hibbing, J. R. (1997). The Effects of Charges of Corruption on Voting Behavior in Congressional Elections, 1982–1990. The Journal of Politics 59, No. 1. Google Scholar

  • [28] Woldendorp, Jaap et al. (1998). Party Government in 20 Democracies: an update (1990–1995). European Journal of Political Research 33, 125–164. Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • [29] Yearbook 1999–2010 European Journal of Political Research. Google Scholar

About the article

Published Online: 2013-03-28

Published in Print: 2013-04-01

Citation Information: Human Affairs, Volume 23, Issue 2, Pages 174–195, ISSN (Online) 1337-401X, ISSN (Print) 1210-3055, DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/s13374-013-0118-4.

Export Citation

© 2013 Institute for Research in Social Communication, Slovak Academy of Sciences. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License. BY-NC-ND 3.0

Citing Articles

Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.

Raimondas Ibenskas and Allan Sikk
Party Politics, 2017, Volume 23, Number 1, Page 43
Pawel Sobkowicz and Frederic Amblard
PLOS ONE, 2016, Volume 11, Number 5, Page e0155098
European Journal of Political Research, 2016, Volume 55, Number 1, Page 160
Stefan Dahlberg, Jonas Linde, and Sören Holmberg
Political Studies, 2015, Volume 63, Number 1_suppl, Page 18
Andreas Bågenholm and Nicholas Charron
West European Politics, 2014, Volume 37, Number 5, Page 903

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in