Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Human Affairs

Postdisciplinary Humanities & Social Sciences Quarterly

Editor-in-Chief: Višnovský, Emil

Ed. by Bianchi, Gabriel / Hrubec, Marek / Tartaglia, James


CiteScore 2016: 0.33

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2016: 0.172
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2016: 0.415

Online
ISSN
1337-401X
See all formats and pricing
More options …
Volume 23, Issue 4

Issues

Philosophical counselling based on dialogical critical thinking

Blanka Šulavíková
  • Institute for Research in Social Communication, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Dubravska cesta 9, 841 04, Bratislava 4, Slovakia
  • Email
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
Published Online: 2013-09-28 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/s13374-013-0157-x

Abstract

Various approaches and methods are used in philosophical counselling. Two main trends can be observed: the first is the use of contemplative methods and the second constitutes approaches based on dialogical critical thinking. The author defends the idea that developing philosophical counselling on the basis of critical thinking presupposes that it is possible for counsellor and client to hold a philosophical dialogue where the relationship is one of expert/lay person. J. Šulavík has described this relationship in greater detail. In the Socratic model, the philosopher and the lay person hold a dialogue whereby they ascertain opinions via inductive comparison and by defining things, creating a shared concept. While the Platonic and Enlightenment models were grounded in the authority of the expert philosopher, in the Socratic and postmodern models, the expert philosopher loses the power to manipulate those who know “less”. Lay people are not passive consumers of a particular “optimal” philosophy but through their own “philosophising” create philosophy and tailor it for themselves. While philosophising, therefore, the philosopher does not take on the role of “producer” of philosophy but of “adviser” (consultant). It is therefore supposed that people have a general need for philosophy and that ultimately they should create and reflect upon their own philosophy.

Keywords: philosophical counselling; critical thinking; Socratic dialogue

  • [1] Achenbach, G. A. (1995). Philosophy, Philosophical Practice and Psychotherapy. In R. Lahav, M. Tillmans (Eds.). Essays on Philosophical Counseling, pp. 61–74. Lanham, New York and London: University Press of America. Google Scholar

  • [2] Amir, L. B. (2004). Three Questionable Assumptions of Philosophical Practice. The International Journal of Applied Philosophy, 2.1, pp. 9–18. Available at: americanspcp.com/docs/ijpp/lydiaamir.pdf . Google Scholar

  • [3] Amir, L. B. (2006). More Philosophy, less Counseling: A Method for Philosophical Counseling. In J. B. Rastrojo, J. O. Garcia, F. M. Garfia (Eds.). Philosophy and Practice: From Theory to Practice, pp. 33–39. Sevilla: Ediciones, X–XI. Google Scholar

  • [4] Boele, D. (1995). Experimental Wisdom and the Art of Living. In R. Lahav, M. Tillmans. Essays on Philosophical Counseling. Lanham, New York and London: University Press of America. Google Scholar

  • [5] Buber, M. (1995). Já a Ty. [I and Thou]. Olomouc: Votobia. Google Scholar

  • [6] Curnow, T. (1999). Thinking about Dialogue. Fifth International Conference on Philosophy in Practice, pp. 45–51. Oxford: Wadham College. Google Scholar

  • [7] Chamberlain, H. S. (1999). Philosophical Counselling: A Dialogue in Critical Thinking. Fifth International Conference on Philosophy in Practice, pp. 34–43. Oxford: Wadham College. Google Scholar

  • [8] Delnoij, J. (1999). Short Socratic Dialogue Workshop. Fifth International Conference on Philosophy in Practice, pp. 52–53. Oxford: Wadham College. Available at: www.insightassessment.com/what&why2010. Google Scholar

  • [9] Facione, P. A. (2004). Critical Thinking: What It is and Why It Counts. Millbrae, CA: California Academic Press. Available at: www.mdaa.org.au/archive/05/manual/app2.pdf. Google Scholar

  • [10] Fisher, R. (2005). Socratic Education: A New Paradigm for Philosophical Enquiry? Creative and Critical Thinking, 4.1, 15–45. Google Scholar

  • [11] Grimes, P. (1997). A Study of Philosophical Midwifery. Available at: coffeewithpierre.com/?q=node/9 . Google Scholar

  • [12] Lahav, R. (2006). Philosophical Practice as Contemplative Philo-Sophia. Practical Philosophy 8, 1. Google Scholar

  • [13] Lebon, T. (1999). Socrates, Philosophical Counselling and Thinking through Dialogue. Fifth International Conference on Philosophy in Practice, pp. 131–142. Oxford: Wadham College. Google Scholar

  • [14] Marinoff, L. (2002). Philosophical Practice. San Diego, New York, Boston, Sydney, Tokyo, Toronto: Academic Press. Google Scholar

  • [15] Nelson, L. (1949). Socratic Method and Critical Philosophy. New York: Dover. Google Scholar

  • [16] Prins-Bakker, A. (1995). Philosophy in Marriage Counseling. In R. Lahav, M. Tillmans (Eds.). Essays on Philosophical Counseling, pp. 135–151. Lanham, New York and London: University Press of America. Google Scholar

  • [17] Rogers, C. R. (2000). Klientom centrovaná terapia. [Client-Centered Therapy]. [Modra: IRO. Google Scholar

  • [18] Rogers, C. R. (1997). Spôsob bytia. [A Way of Being]. Modra: IRO. Google Scholar

  • [19] Schuster, S. C. (1999a). Philosophy Practice: An Alternative to Counseling and Psychotherapy. Westport and London: Praeger. Google Scholar

  • [20] Schuster, S. C. (1999b). Philosophy Practices as Alternative Ways to Well-being. Radical Psychology 1, No.1. http://www.radicalpsychology.org/vol1-1/Schuster.html (accessed August 30, 2013). Google Scholar

  • [21] Šulavík, J. (2001). Metafilozofické implikácie psychoterapie. [Metaphilosphical Implications of Psychoteraphy]. Bratislava: Album. Google Scholar

  • [22] Šulavíková, B. (2006). Autenticita a dobrý život. [Authenticity and the Good Life.] Bratislava: Album. Google Scholar

  • [23] Tuedio, J. A. (1998). Philosophical Counseling as a Window on the Abstract Realities of Everyday Life. Department of Philosophy, California State University, Stanislaus. Google Scholar

  • [24] Wollner, U. (2010). Starostlivosť o seba v Xenofóntovom diele Memorabilia. In V. Suvák (Ed.). Sebapoznanie a/ko starosť o seba, pp. 32–78. Prešov: Filozofická fakulta v Prešove. Google Scholar

  • [25] Xenofón. (1972). Vzpomínky na Sokrata. [Recollections of Socrates]. Praha: Svoboda. Google Scholar

About the article

Published Online: 2013-09-28

Published in Print: 2013-10-01


Citation Information: Human Affairs, Volume 23, Issue 4, Pages 680–688, ISSN (Online) 1337-401X, ISSN (Print) 1210-3055, DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/s13374-013-0157-x.

Export Citation

© 2013 Institute for Research in Social Communication, Slovak Academy of Sciences. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License. BY-NC-ND 3.0

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in