Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Human Affairs

Postdisciplinary Humanities & Social Sciences Quarterly

Editor-in-Chief: Višnovský, Emil

Ed. by Bianchi, Gabriel / Hrubec, Marek / Tartaglia, James


CiteScore 2016: 0.33

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2016: 0.172
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2016: 0.415

Online
ISSN
1337-401X
See all formats and pricing
More options …
Volume 24, Issue 4

Issues

Asynchronous email interview as a qualitative research method in the humanities

Kateřina Ratislavová / Jakub Ratislav
  • Faculty of Business Administration, University of Economics, Prague, nám. W. Churchilla 4, 130 67, Praha 3, Czech Republic
  • Email
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
Published Online: 2014-10-02 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/s13374-014-0240-y

Abstract

The article focuses on a method for collecting qualitative data. The method is the asynchronous email interview. The authors assess the advantages, challenges and best practices of the asynchronous email interview method. They base their assessment on the academic literature and their own experiences using this data collection method in qualitative research on women who had experienced perinatal loss. The asynchronous email interview will never fully replace traditional face-to-face interviews, but it could gain a solid position as a qualitative research method thanks to its unique benefits.

Keywords: asynchronous email interview; qualitative research; data collection

  • [1] Bampton, R., & Cowton, C. J. (2002). The E-interview. Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 3(2). Available at: http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs020295 Google Scholar

  • [2] Beck, C. T. (2005). Benefits of participating in internet discussions: Women helping women. Qualitative Health Research,15(3), 411–422. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1049732304270837CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [3] Birnbaum, M. H. (2004). Human research and data collection via the internet. Annual Review of Psychology, 55, 803–832. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.55.090902.141601CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [4] Bowker, N., & Tuffin, K. (2004). Using the online medium for discursive research about people with disabilities. Social Science Computer Review, 22, 228–241. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0894439303262561CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [5] Brownlow, C., & O’Dell, L. (2002). Ethical issues of qualitative research in online communities. Disability and Society, 17(6), 685–694. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0968759022000010452CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [6] East, L., Jackson, D., O’Brien, L., & Peters, K. (2008). The benefits of computer-mediated communication in nursing research. Contemporary Nurse, 30, 83–88. http://dx.doi.org/10.5172/conu.673.30.1.83CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [7] Kralik, D., Price, K., Warren, J., & Koch, T. (2006). Issues in data generation using email group conversations for nursing research. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 53(2), 213–220. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2006.03717.xCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [8] Kralik, D., Warren, J., Price, K., Koch, T., & Pignone, G. (2005). The ethics of research using electronic mail discussion groups. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 52(5), 537–545. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2005.03612.xCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [9] Mann, C. S. F., & Stewart, F. (2000). Internet communication and qualitative research: A handbook for researching online. London: SAGE. Google Scholar

  • [10] Meho, L. I. (2006). E-mail interviewing in qualitative research: A methodological discussion. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 57(10), 1284–1295. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/asi.20416CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [11] Moon, Y. (2000). Intimate exchanges: Using computers to elicit self-disclosure from consumers. Journal of Consumer Research, 26(4), 323–339. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/209566CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [12] Opdenakker, R. (2006). Advantages and disadvantages of four interview techniques in qualitative research. Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 7(4). Available at: http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/175/391 Google Scholar

  • [13] Selwyn, N., & Robson, K. (1998). Using e-mail as a research tool. Social Research Update, 21. Available at: http://sru.soc.surrey.ac.uk/SRU21.html Google Scholar

  • [14] Walther, J. B., & D’Addario, K. P. (2001). The impacts of emoticons on message interpretation in computer-mediated communication. Social Science Computer Review, 19, 324–347. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/089443930101900307CrossrefGoogle Scholar

About the article

Published Online: 2014-10-02

Published in Print: 2014-10-01


Citation Information: Human Affairs, Volume 24, Issue 4, Pages 452–460, ISSN (Online) 1337-401X, ISSN (Print) 1210-3055, DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/s13374-014-0240-y.

Export Citation

© 2014 Institute for Research in Social Communication, Slovak Academy of Sciences. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License. BY-NC-ND 3.0

Citing Articles

Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.

[1]
Christina Raphaëlle Haldane
Frontiers in Psychology, 2018, Volume 9
[2]
Melanie Brown and Catherine Peck
International Journal for Academic Development, 2018, Page 1
[6]
Xuguang Li, Andrew Cox, and Nigel Ford
Journal of Documentation, 2017, Volume 73, Number 2, Page 284
[7]
Vilhelmiina Harju, Leila Pehkonen, and Hannele Niemi
International Journal of Lifelong Education, 2016, Volume 35, Number 1, Page 2

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in