Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Human Movement

The Journal of University School of Physical Education, Wroclaw

4 Issues per year


CiteScore 2016: 0.41

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2016: 0.208
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2016: 0.230

Open Access
Online
ISSN
1899-1955
See all formats and pricing
More options …
Volume 18, Issue 3

Issues

Sex Differences in Frontal and Transverse Plane Hip and Knee Kinematics During the Modified Star Excursion Balance Test

Brad W. Willis / Swithin Razu / Kelli Baggett / Amirhossein Jahandar / Aaron D. Gray
  • Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, USA
  • Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, USA
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
/ Marjorie Skubic
  • College of Engineering/Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, USA
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
/ Seth L. Sherman / Kyle Blecha / Trent M. Guess
  • School of Health Professions/Physical Therapy, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, USA
  • Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, USA
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
Published Online: 2017-10-31 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/humo-2017-0028

Abstract

Purpose. The modified Star Excursion Balance Test (mSEBT) assesses dynamic neuromuscular control, with predictive ability regarding lower extremity injury risk. Previous kinematic mSEBT analyses are limited to sex differences between injured or fatigued populations or non-fatigued groups in the sagittal plane only. We hypothesize that sex differences exist in the frontal and transverse plane kinematics of the hip and knee in healthy, non-fatigued subjects during the mSEBT. Methods. The descriptive laboratory study involved 38 healthy subjects: 20 males (aged 24.8 ± 2.7 years) and 18 females (24.1 ± 3.7 years). Peak kinematics, obtained by a VICONTM motion system, of the hip and knee in the sagittal, frontal, and transverse plane were compared during the anterior, posteromedial, and posterolateral reach of the mSEBT. Wilcoxon rank test with significant differences at p < 0.05 was used. Results. Kinematic differences existed between the groups in the frontal and transverse plane of the hip and knee in all reach directions (p < 0.05). No differences were found in the sagittal plane of the hip or knee between the groups. Conclusions. Sex differences exist in frontal and transverse plane kinematics of the hip and knee during the mSEBT. The mSEBT may be enhanced as an injury prediction tool, if frontal and transverse plane kinematics were included during risk assessment screening.

Keywords: injury prevention; gender differences; lower extremity; mSEBT

References

  • 1. Lohmander LS, Östenberg A, Englund M, Roos H. High prevalence of knee osteoarthritis, pain, and functional limitations in female soccer players twelve years after anterior cruciate ligament injury. Arthritis Rheum. 2004; 50(10):3145-3152; doi:CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 2. Toth AP, Cordasco FA. Anterior cruciate ligament injuries in the female athlete. J Gend Specif Med. 2001;4(4):25-34.Google Scholar

  • 3. Arendt E, Dick R. Knee injury patterns among men and women in collegiate basketball and soccer. NCAA data and review of literature. Am J Sports Med. 1995;23(6): 694-701; doi:CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 4. Hewett TE, Myer GD, Ford KR. Decrease in neuromuscular control about the knee with maturation in female athletes. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004;86-A(8):1601-1608; doi:CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 5. Myer GD, Ford KR, Hewett TE. Methodological approaches and rationale for training to prevent anterior cruciate ligament injuries in female athletes. Scan J Med Sci Sports. 2004;14(5):275-285; doi:CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 6. Myer GD, Ford KR, Khoury J, Succop P, Hewett TE. Biomechanics laboratory-based prediction algorithm to identify female athletes with high knee loads that increase risk of ACL injury. Br J Sports Med. 2011;45(4):245- 252; doi:CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • 7. Renstrom P, Ljungqvist A, Arendt E, Beynnon B, Fukubayashi T, Garrett W, et al. Non-contact ACL injuries in female athletes: an International Olympic Committee current concepts statement. Br J Sports Med. 2008;42(6): 394-412; doi:CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • 8. Hewett TE, Myer GD, Ford KR, Heidt RS Jr, Colosimo AJ, McLean SG, et al. Biomechanical measures of neuromuscular control and valgus loading of the knee predict anterior cruciate ligament injury risk in female athletes: a prospective study. Am J Sports Med. 2005;33(4):492- 501; doi:CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 9. Paterno MV, Schmitt LC, Ford KR, Rauh MJ, Myer GD, Huang B, et al. Biomechanical measures during landing and postural stability predict second anterior cruciate ligament injury after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and return to sport. Am J Sports Med. 2010; 38(10):1968-1978; doi:CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • 10. Boling M, Padua D, Marshall S, Guskiewicz K, Pyne S, Beutler A. Gender differences in the incidence and prevalence of patellofemoral pain syndrome. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2010;20(5):725-730; doi:CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • 11. Tenforde A, Sayres LC, McCurdy ML, Collado H, Sainani KL, Fredericson M. Overuse injuries in high school runners: lifetime prevalence and prevention strategies. PM & R. 2011;3(2):125-131; doi:CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • 12. Donnell-Fink LA, Klara K, Collins JE, Yang HY, Goczalk MG, Katz JN, et al. Effectiveness of knee injury and anterior cruciate ligament tear prevention programs: a meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2015;10(12):e0144063; doi:CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 13. Sugimoto D, Myer GD, McKeon JM, Hewett TE. Evaluation of the effectiveness of neuromuscular training to reduce anterior cruciate ligament injury in female athletes: a critical review of relative risk reduction and numbers- needed-to-treat analyses. Br J Sports Med. 2012; 46(14):979-988; doi:CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • 14. Wong A. Where girls are missing out on high-school sports: gender inequality in athletics exists at thousands of campuses across the country - and it’s concentrated in one region in particular. The Atlantic. 2015, June 26. Available from: https://www.theatlantic.com/education/archive/2015/06/girls-high-school-sports-inequality/396782/.Google Scholar

  • 15. Myer GD, Ford KR, Khoury J, Succop P, Hewett TE. Development and validation of a clinic-based prediction tool to identify female athletes at high risk for anterior cruciate ligament injury. Am J Sports Med. 2010;38(10): 2025-2033; doi:CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 16. Butler RJ, Lehr ME, Fink ML, Kiesel KB, Plisky PJ. Dynamic balance performance and noncontact lower extremity injury in college football players: an initial study. Sports Health. 2013;5(5):417-422; doi:CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 17. Gribble PA, Hertel J, Plisky P. Using the star excursion balance test to assess dynamic postural-control deficits and outcomes in lower extremity injury: a literature and systematic review. J Athl Train. 2012;47(3):339-357; doi:CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 18. Hertel J, Braham RA, Hale SA, Olmsted-Kramer LC. Simplifying the star excursion balance test: analyses of subjects with and without chronic ankle instability. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2006;36(3):131-137; doi:CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 19. Hertel J. Sensorimotor deficits with ankle sprains and chronic ankle instability. Clin Sports Med. 2008;27(3): 353-370; doi:CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • 20. Plisky PJ, Rauh MJ, Kaminski TW, Underwood FB. Star Excursion Balance Test as a predictor of lower extremity injury in high school basketball players. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2006;36(12):911-919; doi:CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 21. Plisky PJ, Gorman PP, Butler RJ, Kiesel KB, Underwood FB, Elkins B. The reliability of an instrumented device for measuring components of the star excursion balance test. N Am J Sports Phys Ther. 2009;4(2):92-99.Google Scholar

  • 22. Clagg S, Paterno MV, Hewett TE, Schmitt LC. Performance on the modified star excursion balance test at the time of return to sport following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2015;45(6): 444-452; doi:CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • 23. Garrison JC, Bothwell JM, Wolf G, Aryal S, Thigpen CA. Y Balance TestTM anterior reach symmetry at three months is related to single leg functional performance at time of return to sports following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2015;10(5):602-611.Google Scholar

  • 24. Herrington L, Hatcher J, Hatcher A, McNicholas M. A comparison of Star Excursion Balance Test reach distances between ACL deficient patients and asymptomatic controls. Knee. 2009;16(2):149-152; doi:CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • 25. Delahunt E, Chawke M, Kelleher J, Murphy K, Prendiville A, Sweeny L, et al. Lower limb kinematics and dynamic postural stability in anterior cruciate ligament-reconstructed female athletes. J Athl Train. 2013;48(2): 172-185; doi:CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 26. Doherty C, Bleakley C, Hertel J, Caulfield B, Ryan J, Delahunt E. Laboratory measures of postural control during the star excursion balance test after acute firsttime lateral ankle sprain. J Athl Train. 2015;50(6):651- 664; doi:CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 27. Gribble PA, Robinson RH, Hertel J, Denegar CR. The effects of gender and fatigue on dynamic postural control. J Sport Rehabil. 2009;18(2):240-257; doi:CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • 28. Negahban H, Mazaheri M, Kingma I, van Dieën JH. A systematic review of postural control during single-leg stance in patients with untreated anterior cruciate ligament injury. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2014;22(7): 1491-1504; doi:CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • 29. Gribble P, Hertel J, Denegar CR, Buckley W. Reliability and validity of a 2-D video digitizing system during a static and dynamic task. J Sport Rehabil. 2005;14(2):137-149; doi:CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 30. Stone EE, Butler M, McRuer A, Gray A, Marks J, Skubic M. Evaluation of the Microsoft Kinect for screening ACL injury. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2013;2013:4152- 4155; doi:CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 31. Stone EE, Skubic M. Evaluation of an inexpensive depth camera for in-home gait assessment. J Ambient Intell Smart Environ. 2011;3(4):349-361; doi:CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 32. Gribble PA, Hertel J. Considerations for normalizing measures of the star excursion balance test. Meas Phys Educ Exerc Sci. 2003;7(2):89-100; doi:CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 33. Bahr R. Why screening tests to predict injury do not work - and probably never will…: a critical review. Br J Sports Med. 2016;50(13):776-780; doi:CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 34. Smith HC, Johnson RJ, Shultz SJ, Tourville T, Holterman LA, Slauterbeck J, et al. A prospective evaluation of the Landing Error Scoring System (LESS) as a screening tool for anterior cruciate ligament injury risk. Am J Sports Med. 2012;40(3):521-526; doi:CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

About the article

Received: 2017-01-04

Accepted: 2017-08-08

Published Online: 2017-10-31

Published in Print: 2017-09-26


Citation Information: Human Movement, Volume 18, Issue 3, Pages 26–33, ISSN (Online) 1899-1955, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/humo-2017-0028.

Export Citation

© Human Movement. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License. BY-NC-ND 4.0

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in