Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

HUMOR

International Journal of Humor Research

Editor-in-Chief: Ford, Thomas E.


IMPACT FACTOR 2018: 0.558
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 1.084

CiteScore 2018: 1.00

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.367
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 0.614

Online
ISSN
1613-3722
See all formats and pricing
More options …
Volume 25, Issue 3

Issues

Surprise and humor in product design

Designing sensory metaphors in multiple modalities

Geke D. S. Ludden, / Barry M. Kudrowitz, / Hendrik N. J. Schifferstein, / Paul Hekkert,
Published Online: 2012-07-28 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/humor-2012-0015

Abstract

When information from two or more sensory modalities conflicts, this can evoke a surprise reaction as well as feelings of amusement, interest, confusion or disappointment. In concurrence to joke theory, we argue that people appreciate and enjoy appropriate incongruities that can be related back to the product, whereas they are confused by and have negative opinions towards inappropriate incongruities.

This paper reports the design and the evaluation of products in two categories (rubber duckies and deodorants), with (in)appropriate sensory incongruities of three types: visual-tactual, visual-olfactory and visual-auditory. Participants evaluated the level of surprise felt and the intensity of resulting emotions. They also indicated their overall liking for the products.

Both appropriate and inappropriate incongruities were evaluated as surprising as well as confusing. As expected, appropriate incongruities evoked more amusement and were generally favored. Whereas products with visual-tactual incongruities showed large differences in ratings on liking and amusement between appropriate and inappropriate incongruities, these differences were smaller for products with visual-auditory and visual-olfactory incongruities. Possibly, the appropriateness of an incongruity is more conspicuous when it is brought about by a conflict between touch and vision than when olfaction or audition are involved.

Keywords: incongruity; senses; sensory metaphor; surprise; amusement; confusion; humor; product design; design

About the article

Published Online: 2012-07-28

Published in Print: 2012-07-28


Citation Information: Humor, Volume 25, Issue 3, Pages 285–309, ISSN (Online) 1613-3722, ISSN (Print) 0933-1719, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/humor-2012-0015.

Export Citation

©[2012] by Walter de Gruyter Berlin Boston.Get Permission

Citing Articles

Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.

[1]
Jianping Huang and Xiaoang Wan
Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 2019
[2]
Caleb Warren and Martin Reimann
Journal of the Association for Consumer Research, 2019, Page 000
[3]
S. Agrawal, A. Sankaran, A. Laha, S. A. Chemmengath, D. Shrivastava, and K. Sankaranarayanan
IBM Journal of Research and Development, 2019, Volume 63, Number 1, Page 3:1
[4]
Thomas J.L. Van Rompay, Lisa-Marie Kramer, and Daniel Saakes
Food Quality and Preference, 2018
[5]
Geke DS Ludden, Thomas JL van Rompay, Saskia M Kelders, and Julia EWC van Gemert-Pijnen
Journal of Medical Internet Research, 2015, Volume 17, Number 7, Page e172

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in