Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details

HUMOR

International Journal of Humor Research

Editor-in-Chief: Ford, Thomas E.

4 Issues per year


IMPACT FACTOR 2015: 0.467
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 0.574

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2015: 0.507
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2015: 0.535
Impact per Publication (IPP) 2015: 0.603

Online
ISSN
1613-3722
See all formats and pricing
Volume 21, Issue 2 (May 2008)

Issues

Emotional responses to ridicule and teasing: Should gelotophobes react differently?

Tracey Platt
  • Corresponding author
  • University of Hull
Published Online: 2008-05-19 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/HUMOR.2008.005

Abstract

The present study examined the hypothesis that gelotophobia blurs the emotional responses between ridicule and good-natured teasing. Ridicule should induce negative feelings and teasing happiness and surprise in individuals not suffering gelotophobia. Gelotophobes will discriminate less between the two. Their responses to teasing will be similar to ridicule. A sample of adults (N = 105) specified which emotions they would experience in nine scenarios of social interactions pre-selected to represent bullying ridicule or good-natured teasing. Ridicule elicited strong responses of shame, fear and anger, and other negative emotions but low happiness and surprise. Responses of gelotophobes and non-gelotophobes were highly parallel, with the exception that among extreme gelotophobes stronger shame and fear were displayed than among non-gelotophobes. Good-natured teasing seemed to elicit happiness and surprise and low levels of negative emotions among the non-gelotophobes. Among the gelotophobes, however, it was the negative emotions; primarily shame, fear, and anger that were exhibited as the emotional response pattern. In fact, the emotion profile to good-humored teasing was highly similar to the profile in response to the bullying-ridiculing situations. Gelotophobes' perceptions do not discriminate between playful teasing and good-natured teasing. They do not identify the safe and non-threatening quality of the teasing situations. Treatment of gelotophobes should, therefore, involve helping them to identify the play-signals, i.e., the meta-message that the interaction is playful, for fun and that no harm is intended.

Keywords:: Bullying; gelotophobia; laughter; ridicule; teasing

About the article


Published Online: 2008-05-19

Published in Print: 2008-05-01


Citation Information: Humor - International Journal of Humor Research, ISSN (Online) 1613-3722, ISSN (Print) 0933-1719, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/HUMOR.2008.005. Export Citation

Citing Articles

Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.

[1]
Ilona Papousek, Günter Schulter, Christian Rominger, Andreas Fink, and Elisabeth M. Weiss
Psychiatry Research, 2015
[2]
Ching-Lin Wu, Chih-Pei An, Lei-Pin Tseng, Hsueh-Chih Chen, Yu-Chen Chan, Shu-Ling Cho, and Meng-Ling Tsai
Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 2015, Volume 10, Page 116
[3]
Shanmukh Vasant Kamble, René T. Proyer, and Willibald Ruch
Psychological Studies, 2014, Volume 59, Number 4, Page 337
[4]
Tracey Platt, Jennifer Hofmann, Willibald Ruch, and René T. Proyer
Motivation and Emotion, 2013, Volume 37, Number 4, Page 776
[5]
René T. Proyer, Lukas E. Meier, Tracey Platt, and Willibald Ruch
Social Psychology of Education, 2013, Volume 16, Number 3, Page 399
[6]
A.C. Samson, P. Thibault, R.T. Proyer, and W. Ruch
Revue Européenne de Psychologie Appliquée/European Review of Applied Psychology, 2010, Volume 60, Number 4, Page 247
[7]
Willibald Ruch and René T. Proyer
Personality and Individual Differences, 2009, Volume 46, Number 5-6, Page 627
[8]
René T. Proyer, Tracey Platt, and Willibald Ruch
Personality and Individual Differences, 2010, Volume 49, Number 1, Page 54
[9]
Martin Führ, René T. Proyer, and Willibald Ruch
Nordic Psychology, 2009, Volume 61, Number 2, Page 62
[10]
Władysław Chłopicki, Anna Radomska, René Proyer, and Willibald Ruch
Polish Psychological Bulletin, 2010, Volume 41, Number 4
[11]
Andrea C. Samson, René T. Proyer, Grazia Ceschi, Pier Paolo Pedrini, and Willibald Ruch
Swiss Journal of Psychology, 2011, Volume 70, Number 2, Page 53
[12]
Andrea C. Samson, Oswald Huber, and Willibald Ruch
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 2011, Volume 41, Number 4, Page 475
[13]
Willibald Ruch and René T. Proyer
Humor - International Journal of Humor Research, 2009, Volume 22, Number 1-2
[14]
T. Platt, W. Ruch, and R.T. Proyer
Zeitschrift für Gerontologie und Geriatrie, 2010, Volume 43, Number 1, Page 36

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in