Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details


International Journal of Humor Research

Editor-in-Chief: Ford, Thomas E.

IMPACT FACTOR 2015: 0.467
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 0.574

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2015: 0.507
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2015: 0.535
Impact per Publication (IPP) 2015: 0.603

See all formats and pricing
Select Volume and Issue


30,00 € / $42.00 / £23.00

Get Access to Full Text

Were they really laughed at? That much? Gelotophobes and their history of perceived derisibility

René T. Proyer1 / Christian F. Hempelmann2 / Willibald Ruch1

1University of Zurich

2hakia Inc., New York

Citation Information: Humor - International Journal of Humor Research. Volume 22, Issue 1-2, Pages 213–231, ISSN (Online) 1613-3722, ISSN (Print) 0933-1719, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/HUMR.2009.010, February 2009

Publication History

Published Online:


The List of Derisible Situations (LDS; Proyer, Hempelmann and Ruch, List of Derisible Situations (LDS), University of Zurich, 2008) consists of 102 different occasions for being laughed at. They were retrieved in a corpus study and compiled into the LDS. Based on this list, information on the frequency and the intensity with which people recall being laughed at during a given time-span (12 months in this study) can be collected. An empirical study (N = 114) examined the relations between the LDS and the fear of being laughed at (gelotophobia), the joy of being laughed at (gelotophilia), and the joy of laughing at others (katagelasticism; Ruch and Proyer this issue). More than 92% of the participants recalled having been laughed at at least once over the past 12 months. Highest scores were found for experiencing an embarrassing situation, chauvinism of others or being laughed at for doing something awkward or clumsy. Gelotophobia, gelotophilia, and katagelasticism were related about equally to the recalled frequency of events of being laughed at (with the lowest relation to katagelasticism). Gelotophobia, gelotophilia, and katagelasticism yielded a distinct and plausible pattern of correlations to the frequency of events of being laughed at. Gelotophobes recalled the situations of being laughed at with a higher intensity than others. Thus, the fear of being laughed at exists to a large degree independently from actual experiences of being laughed at, but is related to a higher intensity with which these events are experienced.

Keywords:: Corpus study; gelotophilia; gelotophobia; humor; katagelasticism; laughing at

Citing Articles

Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.

René T. Proyer, Sara Wellenzohn, and Willibald Ruch
The Journal of Psychology, 2014, Volume 148, Number 1, Page 113
Psychological Reports, 2012, Volume 110, Number 1, Page 25
Andrea C. Samson, René T. Proyer, Grazia Ceschi, Pier Paolo Pedrini, and Willibald Ruch
Swiss Journal of Psychology, 2011, Volume 70, Number 2, Page 53
Andrea C. Samson, Oswald Huber, and Willibald Ruch
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 2011, Volume 41, Number 4, Page 475

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.