Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …


International Journal of Humor Research

Editor-in-Chief: Ford, Thomas E.

4 Issues per year

IMPACT FACTOR 2016: 0.655
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 0.718

CiteScore 2016: 0.94

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2016: 0.458
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2016: 0.759

See all formats and pricing
More options …
Volume 28, Issue 2


The social consequences of disparagement humor: Introduction and overview

Thomas E. Ford
Published Online: 2015-04-02 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/humor-2015-0016


  • Berlyne, Daniel E. 1972. Humor and its kin. In J. H. Goldstein & P. E. McGhee (eds.), The psychology of humor, 43–60. New York: Academic.Google Scholar

  • Bill, Brigitte & Peter Naus. 1992. The role of humor in the interpretation of sexist incidents. Sex Roles 27. 645–664.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Ferguson, Mark A. & Thomas E. Ford. 2008. Disparagement humor: A theoretical and empirical review of psychoanalytic, superiority and social identity theories. Humor: International Journal of Humor Research 21(3). 283–312.Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Gruner, Charles R. 1997. The game of humor: A comprehensive theory of why we laugh. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.Google Scholar

  • Johnson, A. Michael. 1990. The “only joking” defense: Attribution bias or impression management? Psychological Reports 67. 1051–1056.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kahn, William A. 1989. Toward a sense of organizational humor: Implications for organizational diagnosis and change. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science 25. 45–63.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • La Fave, Lawrence. 1972. Humor judgments as a function of reference groups and identification classes. In Goldstein, Jeffrey H. and Paul E. McGhee (eds.), The psychology of humor, 195–210. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar

  • La Fave, Lawrence, Jay Haddad & William A. Maesen. 1996 [1976]. Superiority, enhanced self-esteem, and perceived incongruity humor theory. In A. J. Chapman & H. C. Foot (eds.), Humor and laughter: Theory, research and applications, 63–91. New York: Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar

  • Martineau, William H. 1972. A model of social functions of humor. In J. H. Goldstein & P. E. McGhee (eds.), The psychology of humor, 101–125. New York: Academic.Google Scholar

  • McGhee, Paul E. 1972. On the cognitive origins of incongruity humor: Fantasy assimilation versus reality assimilation. In J. H. Goldstein & P. E. McGhee (eds.), The psychology of humor, 61–79. New York: Academic.Google Scholar

  • Meyer, John C. 2000. Humor as a double-edged sword: Four functions of humor in communication. Communication Theory 10. 310–331.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Mulkay, Michael J. 1988. On humor: Its nature and its place in modern society. New York: Blackwell Inc.Google Scholar

  • Obrdlik, Antonin J. 1942. Gallows humor: A sociological phenomenon. American Journal of Sociology 47. 709–716.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Pratt, S. B. 1998. ‘Razzing: Ritualized uses of humor as a form of identification among American Indians’. In D. D. Tanno and A. Gonzalez (eds.), Communication and Identity across Cultures, 56–79. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar

  • Tajfel, Henri & John C. Turner. 1986. The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In S. Worchel & W. G. Austin (eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations, 7–24. Chicago: Nelson-Hall.Google Scholar

  • Terrion, Jenepher L. & Blake E. Ashforth. 2002. From ‘I’ to ‘We’: The role of putdown humor and identity in the development of a temporary group. Human Relations 55(1). 55–88.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Zillmann, Dolf. 1983. Disparagement humor. In P. E. McGhee & J. H. Goldstein (eds.), Handbook of humor research, 85–107. New York: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar

  • Zillmann, Dolf, & Joanne R. Cantor. 1996 [1976]. A dispositional theory of humor and mirth. In A. J. Chapman & H. C. Foot (eds.), Humor and laughter: Theory, research and applications, 93–116. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar

About the article

Thomas E. Ford

Thomas E. Ford is a professor of psychology at Western Carolina University. He received his B. S. from Texas Christian University and his Ph.D. in Social Psychology from the University of Maryland. His research interests include the role of disparagement humor in promoting expressions of prejudice and the relationship between humor and subjective well-being.

Published Online: 2015-04-02

Published in Print: 2015-05-01

Citation Information: HUMOR, Volume 28, Issue 2, Pages 163–169, ISSN (Online) 1613-3722, ISSN (Print) 0933-1719, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/humor-2015-0016.

Export Citation

©2015 by De Gruyter Mouton. Copyright Clearance Center

Citing Articles

Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.

Mónica Romero-Sánchez, Hugo Carretero-Dios, Jesús L. Megías, Miguel Moya, and Thomas E. Ford
Violence Against Women, 2017, Volume 23, Number 8, Page 951

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in