Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

HUMOR

International Journal of Humor Research

Editor-in-Chief: Ford, Thomas E.

4 Issues per year


IMPACT FACTOR 2017: 0.660
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 1.059

CiteScore 2017: 1.27

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2017: 0.415
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2017: 1.228

Online
ISSN
1613-3722
See all formats and pricing
More options …
Volume 28, Issue 2

Issues

Humor as an abrasive or a lubricant in social situations: Martineau revisited

Leslie Janes
  • Corresponding author
  • Department of Psychology, Brescia University College, 1285 Western Rd, London, Ontario, Canada
  • Email
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
/ James Olson
Published Online: 2015-04-02 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/humor-2015-0021

Abstract

In Martineau’s seminal chapter on the social functions of humor, he postulated some of the ways in which disparagement humor shapes social behavior. This research paper discusses three research studies that compared the effects of other-deprecating humor and self-deprecating humor on the observer and examines how they relate to Martineau’s theory. In our research, we hypothesized that people who observe ridicule of others experience “jeer pressure.” This inhibiting effect on behavior was expected to result in conformity to others’ opinions, fear about failing or standing out, and conventional thinking. In the first two studies, participants observed videotapes containing self-ridiculing humor, other-deprecating humor, or non-ridiculing/no humor. Participants then completed tasks assessing conforming, fear of failure, and creativity. Results of both studies showed that participants who observed ridicule of others were more conforming and more afraid of failing than participants who observed self-deprecating humor or the control condition. Study 3 examined the effects of ridicule of others versus self-deprecating humor on creativity using a more sophisticated creativity measure, and less caustic humor. Results supported the hypothesis that observing self-deprecating humor would result in higher levels of creativity compared to the other-ridicule condition. Implications of these findings for Martineau’s model are discussed.

Keywords: self-deprecating humor; ridicule; fear of failure; conformity and creativity

References

  • Atkinson, J. W. & G. H. Litwin. 1960. Achievement motive and test anxiety conceived as motive to approach success and motive to avoid failure. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 60. 52–63.PubMedCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Becker, A. B. 2012. Comedy types and political campaigns: The differential influence of other-directed hostile humor and self-ridicule on candidate evaluations. Mass Communications and Society 15. 791–812.Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bippus, A. 2007. Factors predicting the perceived effectiveness of politicians’ use of humor during a debate. Humor 20(2). 105–121.Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Bryant, J., D. Brown & S. L. Parks. 1981. Ridicule as an educational corrective. Journal of Educational Psychology 73. 722–727.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bryant, J., D. Brown, S. L. Parks & D. Zillmann. 1983. Children’s imitation of a ridiculed model. Human Communication Research 10. 243–255.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Ellithorpe, M., S. Esralew & L. Holbert. 2014. Putting the “self” in self-deprecation: When deprecating humor about minorities is acceptable. Humor: International Journal of Humor Research 27. 401–422.Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Ferguson, M. A. & T. E. Ford. 2008. Disparagement humor: A theoretical and empirical review of psychoanalytic, superiority, and social identity theories. Humor: International Journal of Humor Research 21. 283–312.Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Ford, T. E., E. R. Wentzel & J. Lorion. 2001. Effects of exposure to sexist humor on perceptions of normative tolerance of sexism. European Journal of Social Psychology 31. 677–691.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Freud, S. 1960 (1905). Jokes and their relation to the unconscious. (James Strachey, Trans.). New York, NY: Norton.Google Scholar

  • Greengross, G. & G. F. Miller. 2008. Dissing oneself versus dissing rivals: Effects of status, personality, and sex on the short-term and long-term attractiveness of self-deprecating and other-deprecating humor. Evolutionary Psychology 6. 393–408.Google Scholar

  • Hobbes, T. 1968 (1651). Leviathan. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar

  • Janes, L. M. & J. M. Olson. 2000. Jeer pressure: The behavioral effects of observing ridicule of others. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 26. 474–485.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Janes, L. M., J. M. Olson & M. Dankiewitz. 2009. The effects of different humor styles on creativity. Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar

  • Kochersberger, A., T. Ford, J. Woodzicka, M. Romero-Sanchez & H. Carretero-Dios. 2014. The role of identification with women as a determinant of amusement with sexist humor. Humor: The International Journal of Humor Research 27. 441–460.Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • La Fave, L. 1972. Humor judgments as a function of reference groups and identification classes. In J. H. Goldstein & P. E. McGhee, The psychology of humor, 195–210. New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar

  • Lundy, D. E., J. Tam & M. R. Cunningham. 1998. Heterosexual romantic preferences: The importance of humor and physical attractiveness for different types of relationships. Personal Relationships 5. 311–325.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Martin, R. A. 2001. Humor, laughter, and physical health: Methodological issues and research findings. Psychological Bulletin 127. 504–519.CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar

  • Martineau, W. H. 1972. A model of the social functions of humor. In J. H. Goldstein & P. E. McGhee (eds.), The psychology of humor, 101–125. New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar

  • Ryan, K. M. & J. Kanjorski. 1998. The enjoyment of sexist humor, rape attitudes, and relationship aggression in college students. Sex Roles 38. 743–756.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Shapiro, J. P., R. F. Baumeister & J. W. Kessler. 1991. A three-component model of children’s teasing: Aggression, humor, and ambiguity. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology 10. 459–472.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Stocking, S. H. & D. Zillmann. 1976. Effects of humorous disparagement of self, friend, and enemy. Psychological Reports 39. 455–461.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Tajfel, H. 1978. The psychological structure of intergroup relations. In H. Tajfel (ed.), Differentiation between social groups: Studies in the social psychology of intergroup relations, London: Academic Press.Google Scholar

  • Tajfel, H. & J. C. Turner. 1986. The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In William G. Austin & Stephen Worcheland (eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations, 7–24. Chicago, IL: Nelson-Hall.Google Scholar

  • Torrance, E. P. 1962. Guiding creative talent. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar

  • Torrance, E. P. 1966. The Torrance tests of creative thinkingnormstechnical manual research editionverbal tests, forms A and Bfigural tests, forms A and B. Princeton, NJ: Personnel Press.Google Scholar

  • Torrance, E. P. & J. Presbury. 1984. The criteria of success used in 242 recent experimental studies of creativity. Creative Child & Adult Quarterly 9. 238–243.Google Scholar

  • Torrance, E. P. & H. T. Safter. 1989. The long range predictive validity of the just suppose test. Journal of Creative Behavior 23. 219–223.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Wicker, F. W., W. L. Baron & A. C. Willis. 1980. Disparagement humor: Dispositions and resolutions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 39. 701–709.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Wilson, C. P. 1979. Jokes: Form, content, use, and function. New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar

  • Wolff, H. A., C. E. Smith & H. A. Murray. 1934. The psychology of humor: A study of responses to race-disparagement jokes. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 28. 341–365.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Zillmann, D. 1983. Disparagement humor. In P. E. McGhee & J. H. Goldstein (eds.), Handbook of humor research, 85–108. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar

About the article

Leslie Janes

Leslie Janes obtained her Ph.D. at the University of Western Ontario in London, Canada and has been a faculty member at Brescia University College, an affiliate of the University of Western Ontario, since 2003. She has conducted research on many topics, including social cognition, attitudes, and humor.

James Olson

James Olson obtained his Ph.D. at the University of Waterloo and has been a faculty member at the University of Western Ontario in London, Canada, since 1978. He served as Chair of the Psychology Department from 1998 to 2003. He has conducted research on many topics, and has published more than 100 articles and chapters and has co-edited fifteen books. He has served as an Associate Editor of three scientific journals, including the Journal of Personality and Social Psychology from 1995 to 1998. He is currently the co-editor of the series Advances in Experimental Social Psychology.


Published Online: 2015-04-02

Published in Print: 2015-05-01


Citation Information: HUMOR, Volume 28, Issue 2, Pages 271–288, ISSN (Online) 1613-3722, ISSN (Print) 0933-1719, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/humor-2015-0021.

Export Citation

©2015 by De Gruyter Mouton.Get Permission

Citing Articles

Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.

[1]
Caleb Warren, Adam Barsky, A Peter Mcgraw, Vicki Morwitz, and Deborah MacInnis
Journal of Consumer Research, 2018

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in