Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …


International Journal of Humor Research

Editor-in-Chief: Ford, Thomas E.

IMPACT FACTOR 2017: 0.660
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 1.059

CiteScore 2017: 1.27

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2017: 0.415
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2017: 1.228

See all formats and pricing
More options …
Volume 30, Issue 3


Performing rebelliousness: Dutch political humor in the 1780s

Ivo Nieuwenhuis
Published Online: 2017-05-30 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/humor-2016-0076


This article takes the notion of rebelliousness as the starting point for an analysis of eighteenth-century Dutch political humor. In several recent publications from humor scholars, the rebellious image of political humor in today’s world is questioned. This skepticism towards the idea of humor as a form of rebellion is connected to four sources of political humor that were published as part of the conflict between the reformist Patriots and the conservative Orangists, that took place in the Dutch Republic during the 1780s. It is shown that, comparable to the situation in contemporary political humor, the rebellious outlook of these sources is to a large extent a matter of rhetoric and convention. Their crossing of social and cultural boundaries and their attacks on the powers that be are part of a long cultural tradition, of which the actual social impact is doubtful. Also, the humor used in these sources contains obvious disciplinary tendencies, that emasculate their rebellious potential in yet another way. The new insights regarding political humor of the past that are thus produced prove the scholarly relevance of connecting theoretical perspectives based on the study of contemporary humor to historical cases of humor.

Keywords: eighteenth century; political humor; rebelliousness; libels; cartoons


  • Altena, Peter. 2015. Who is the ape, who the human? Reize door het Aapenland (1788) and Die Affenkönige oder die Reformation des Affenlandes (1789) considered. In Marijke Meijer Drees & Sonja De Leeuw (eds.), The power of satire, 135–146. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.Google Scholar

  • Anonymous [Henrik Sterck]. 1782. Lanterne magique of toverlantaern [Lanterne magique or magic lantern]. Amsterdam: Dirk de Man [et al.].Google Scholar

  • Anonymous [Nicolaas Hoefnagel]. 1782. De vrolyke Walon met de rarekiek-kas [The merry Walloon with the peepshow]. S.l. [Amsterdam].Google Scholar

  • Balzer, Richard. 1998. Peepshows: A visual history. New York: Abrams.Google Scholar

  • Bergson, Henri. 1914 [1900]. Laughter: An essay on the meaning of the comic. New York: The Macmillan Company.Google Scholar

  • Billig, Michael. 2005. Laughter and ridicule: Towards a social critique of humour. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar

  • Bremmer, Jan & Herman Roodenburg (eds.). 1997. A cultural history of humour. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar

  • Carrell, Amy. 2008. Historical views of humor. In Victor Raskin & Willibald Ruch (eds.), The primer of humor research, 303–332. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

  • Crangle, Richard, Mervyn Heard & Ine Van Dooren (eds.). 2005. Realms of light: Uses and perceptions of the magic lantern from the 17th to the 21st century. Ripon: Magic Lantern Society.Google Scholar

  • Darnton, Robert. 2010. The devil in the holy water, or the art of slander from Louis XIV to Napoleon. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar

  • Deen, Femke, David Onnekink & Michel Reinders (eds.). 2011. Pamphlets and politics in the Dutch Republic. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar

  • Dickie, Simon. 2011. Cruelty and laughter: Forgotten comic literature and the unsentimental eighteenth century. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

  • Gatrell, Vic. 2006. City of laughter: Sex and satire in eighteenth-century. London & New York: Walker.Google Scholar

  • Graf, Fritz. 1997. Cicero, Plautus and Roman laughter. In Jan Bremmer & Herman Roodenburg (eds.), A cultural history of humor, 29–39. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar

  • Griffin, Dustin. 1994. Satire: A critical reintroduction. Lexington: University of Kentucky Press.Google Scholar

  • Grijzenhout, Frans, Wijnand Mijnhardt & Niek van Sas (eds.). 1987. Voor vaderland en vrijheid: De revolutie van de patriotten [For fatherland and freedom: The revolution of the patriots]. Amsterdam: De Bataafsche Leeuw.Google Scholar

  • Harms, Roeland. 2011. Pamfletten en publieke opinie: Massamedia in de zeventiende eeuw [Pamphlets and public opinion: Mass media in the seventeenth century]. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.Google Scholar

  • Holm, Nicholas. 2012. Dissent in jest: The political aesthetics of contemporary media humour. Hamilton, ON: McMaster University dissertation.Google Scholar

  • Jones, Jeffrey. 2010. Entertaining politics: Satiric television and political engagement. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar

  • Klein, Stephan. 1995. Patriots Republikanisme: Politieke cultuur in Nederland (1766–1787) [Patriot Republicanism: Political culture in the Netherlands (1766–1787)]. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.Google Scholar

  • Le Goff, Jacques. 1997. Laughter in the middle ages. In Jan Bremmer & Herman Roodenburg (eds.), A cultural history of humor, 40–53. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar

  • Medovoi, Leerom. 2005. Rebels: Youth and the cold war origins of identity. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar

  • Morreall, John. 2008. Philosophy and religion. In Victor Raskin & Willibald Ruch (eds.), The primer of humor research, 211–242. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

  • Nieuwenhuis, Ivo. 2014a. Onder het mom van satire: Laster, spot en ironie in Nederland, 1780–1800 [Under the guise of satire: Slander, ridicule and irony in the Netherlands, 1780–1800]. Hilversum: Verloren.Google Scholar

  • Nieuwenhuis, Ivo. 2014b. Geen effectiever vermaak dan leedvermaak: Humor als retorisch wapen in de Lanterne magique of toverlantaern (1782-83) [No more effective freude than schadenfreude: Humor as a rhetorical weapon in the Lanterne magique of toverlantaern (1782-83)]. TS: Tijdschrift voor Tijdschriftstudies 36. 101–118.Google Scholar

  • Nieuwenhuis, Ivo. 2016. Politiek op de kermis: Het genre van de gefingeerde rarekiekvertoning [Politics at the fair: The genre of the fake peepshow]. Mededelingen van de Stichting Jacob Campo Weyerman 39(1). 1–16.Google Scholar

  • Quintero, Ruben (ed.). 2007. A companion to satire: Ancient and modern. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Raskin, Victor & Willibald Ruch (eds.). 2008. The primer of humor research. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

  • Reinders, Michel. 2013. Printed pandemonium: Popular print and politics in the Netherlands 1650–72. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar

  • Rosendaal, Joost. 2005. De Nederlandse Revolutie: Vrijheid, volk en vaderland, 1783-1799 [The Dutch revolution: Freedom, people and fatherland, 1783-1799]. Nijmegen: Vantilt.Google Scholar

  • Ruch, Willibald. 1998. Foreword and overview. Sense of humor: A new look at an old concept. In Willibald Ruch (ed.), The sense of humor: Explorations of a personality characteristic, 3–14. Berlin: Mouton de GruyterGoogle Scholar

  • Schama, Simon. 1977. Patriots and liberators: Revolution in the Netherlands, 1780-1813. London: Collins.Google Scholar

  • Tsakona, Villy. 2013. Parliamentary punning: Is the opposition more humorous than the ruling party? European Journal of Humour Research 1(2). 101–111.Google Scholar

  • Van Sas, Niek. 1987. Opiniepers en politieke cultuur [Opinion press and political culture]. In Frans Grijzenhout, Wijnand Mijnhardt & Niek van Sas (eds.), Voor vaderland en vrijheid: De revolutie van de patriotten, 97–130. Amsterdam: De Bataafsche Leeuw.Google Scholar

  • Verberckmoes, Johan. 1997. The comic and the Counter-Reformation in the Spanish Netherlands. In Jan Bremmer & Herman Roodenburg (eds.), A cultural history of humor, 76–89. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar

  • Verberckmoes, Johan. 1998. Schertsen, schimpen en schateren: Geschiedenis van het lachen in de Zuidelijke Nederlanden, zestiende en zeventiende eeuw [Jesting, jeering and roaring: History of laughter in the Southern Netherlands, sixteenth and seventeenth century]. Nijmegen: SUN.Google Scholar

  • Woordenboek der Nederlandsche Taal [Dictionary of the Dutch language]. Online. http://gtb.inl.nl/.

  • Zijp, Dick. 2014. Re-thinking Dutch cabaret: The conservative implications of humour in the Dutch cabaret tradition. Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam MA thesis.Google Scholar

About the article

Published Online: 2017-05-30

Published in Print: 2017-07-26

Citation Information: HUMOR, Volume 30, Issue 3, Pages 261–277, ISSN (Online) 1613-3722, ISSN (Print) 0933-1719, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/humor-2016-0076.

Export Citation

© 2017 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston.Get Permission

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in