Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

International Commentary on Evidence

Editor-in-Chief: Singh, Charanjit

1 Issue per year

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2016: 0.105

See all formats and pricing
More options …

Organised Crime, Anonymous Witnesses and Fair Trials in Ireland: Responding to R v Davis

Liz Campbell
Published Online: 2009-02-23 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.2202/1554-4567.1086

This article assesses the absence of witness anonymity in Ireland, and explores the likelihood of its future adoption, using the recent decision of the House of Lords in R v Davis and the Criminal Evidence (Witness Anonymity) Act 2008 as a catalyst for this discussion. It examines the potential threat posed by anonymous evidence to the constitutional right to a fair trial in Ireland, and it analyses current incursions on the right to cross-examine witnesses, which have received judicial imprimatur.However, despite the lack of anonymous witness in the courts and in political and legal debate, three developments suggest that Irish policy makers may not remain averse to such a tactic: the erosion of the right to cross-examination in emergency legislation; the use of anonymous witnesses in civil proceedings; and the desire to incorporate third party interests and rights in criminal justice matters.This article concludes by considering ostensibly less problematic means of protecting intimidated witnesses and their evidence, as alternatives to anonymous evidence.

Keywords: intimidated witnesses; fair trials; criminal justice in Ireland

About the article

Published Online: 2009-02-23

Citation Information: International Commentary on Evidence, ISSN (Online) 1554-4567, DOI: https://doi.org/10.2202/1554-4567.1086.

Export Citation

©2011 Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co. KG, Berlin/Boston. Copyright Clearance Center

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in