Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

International Commentary on Evidence

Editor-in-Chief: Singh, Charanjit

1 Issue per year


SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2016: 0.105

Online
ISSN
1554-4567
See all formats and pricing
More options …

Confrontation and Compulsory Process: U.S. and European Approaches Compared

William E. O'Brian Jr
Published Online: 2012-01-10 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.2202/1554-4567.1118

This paper discusses the relationship between the English hearsay rule and the principles governing the right to a fair trial under Article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights. While the provisions serve similar purposes, they do not always produce the same result. Two sorts of cases are discussed: cases where the hearsay rule admits evidence that should be excluded because it violates the defendant’s right to examine or have examined the witnesses against him, and cases where the hearsay rule excludes evidence that should be admitted to protect the defendant’s right to a fair trial. The treatment of these cases is contrasted to the treatment of similar cases under the Sixth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.

Keywords: confrontation; compulsory process; hearsay

About the article

Published Online: 2012-01-10


Citation Information: International Commentary on Evidence, ISSN (Online) 1554-4567, DOI: https://doi.org/10.2202/1554-4567.1118.

Export Citation

©2012 Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co. KG, Berlin/Boston. Copyright Clearance Center

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in