Altmann, E.M and J.G. Trafton. 2002. Memory for goals: an activation-based model, Cogn. Sci. 26: 39–83.Google Scholar
Anderson, J.R. 2007. How can the human mind occur in the physical universe? Oxford University Press, New York.Google Scholar
Anderson, J.R. and C. Lebiere. (1998). The atomic components of thought. Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ.Google Scholar
Anderson, J.R., L.M. Reder and C. Lebiere. 1996. Working memory: activation limitations on retrieval, Cogn. Psychol. 30: 221–256.Google Scholar
Borst, J.P. and J.R. Anderson. 2015. Using the ACT-R cognitive architecture in combination with fMRI data. In: (B.U. Forstmann and E.-J. Wagenmakers, eds) An Introduction to model-based cognitive neuroscience. Springer Science + Business Media, New York, pp. 339–352Google Scholar
Borst, J.P., N.A. Taatgen and H. van Rijn. 2015. What makes interruptions disruptive? A process-model account of the effects of the problem state bottleneck on task interruption and resumption. In: Proceedings of the CHI 2015, April 18–23 2015. ACM Press, Seoul, Republic of Korea.Google Scholar
Cowan, N., C.C. Morey and Z. Chen, (in press). The legend of the magical number seven. In: (S. Della Sala, ed) Tall tales about the brain: things we think we know about the mind, but ain’t so. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gillie, T. and D.E. Broadbent. 1989. What makes interruptions disruptive? A study of length, similarity, and complexity, Psychol. Res. 50: 243–406.Google Scholar
Gray, W.D., R.M. Young and S.S. Kirschenbaum. 1997. Introduction to this special issue on cognitive architectures and human-computer interaction. Hum.-Comput. Int. 12: 301–309.Google Scholar
Marewski, J.N. and K. Mehlhorn. 2011. Using the ACT-R architecture to specify 39 quantitative process models of decision making. Judgm. Decis. Mak. 6: 439–519.Google Scholar
McFarlane, D.C. and K.A. Latorella. 2002. The scope and importance of human interruption in human–computer interaction design. Hum.-Comput. Int. 17: 1–61.Google Scholar
Miller, G.A. 1956. The magical number seven plus or minus two: some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychol. Rev. 63: 81–97.Google Scholar
Prezenski, S. and N. Russwinkel. 2014. Combining cognitive ACT-R models with usability testing reveals users mental model while shopping with a smartphone application. International Journal on Advances in Intelligent Systems, 7(3–4): 700–715.Google Scholar
Salvucci, D.D. and N.A. Taatgen. 2010. The multitasking mind. Oxford University Press, New York.Google Scholar
Schunn, C.D. and D. Wallach. 2005. Evaluating goodness-of-fit in comparison of models to data. In: (W. Tack, ed) Psychologie der Kognition: Reden und Vortraege anlaesslich der Emeritierung von Werner Tack. University of Saarland Press, Saarbruecken, pp. 115–154Google Scholar
Statista. 2015a. Anzahl der Smartphone-Nutzer in Deutschland in den Jahren 2009 bis 2015 (in Millionen) [Amount of smartphone users in Germany from 2009 to 2015 in millions]. Retrieved from http://de.statista.com/statistik/daten/studie/198959/umfrage/anzahl-der-smartphonenutzer-in-deutschland-seit-2010/ [17 June 2015].
Statista 2015b. Prognose zur Anzahl der Smartphone-Nutzer weltweit von 2012 bis 2018 (in Milliarden) [Predicted amount of smartphone users worldwide from 2012 to 2018 in billions]. Retrieved from http://de.statista.com/statistik/daten/studie/309656/umfrage/prognose-zur-anzahl-der-smartphone-nutzer-weltweit/ [17 June 2015].
Trafton, J.G., E.M. Altmann, D.P. Brock and F.E. Mintz. 2003. Preparing to resume an interrupted task: effects of prospective goal encoding and retrospective rehearsal. Int. J. Hum.-Comput. St. 58: 583–603.Google Scholar
Wickens, C.D., J.G. Hollands, S. Banbury and R Parasuraman. 2013. Engineering psychology and human performance. 4th edition. Pearson Education, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey.Google Scholar
About the article
Maria Wirzberger, M. Sc. works as research assistant within the interdisciplinary DFG Research Training Group “CrossWorlds” at the TU Chemnitz. In 2012, she received a B. Sc. in Psychology from the University of Hagen, and completed the master’s program Human Factors at the TU Berlin in 2014. Her current PhD project focusses on connecting cognitive modeling and instructional design by exploring the construct of cognitive load with the cognitive architecture ACT-R.
Prof. Dr.-Ing. Nele Russwinkel
Nele Russwinkel holds a junior professorship for Cognitive Modeling in dynamic Human-Machine Systems at the TU Berlin. Based on a B. Sc. and M. Sc. in Cognitive Science from the University of Osnabrueck and some experience in industry, she held a scholarship within the DFG Research Training Group “ProMeTeI” at the TU Berlin, where she obtained her PhD in 2009. Besides others, her research is concerned with cognitive modeling of human-computer interaction on purposes of usability, embodied spatial cognition and time estimation.
Published Online: 2015-07-12
Published in Print: 2015-08-01